Astrology And Hitler In Iiw.w.

[sergio]

Historical astrological reports proved no use in defeating Hitler:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7276217.stm
Sergio

[dobro]

It appears MI5 was trying to anticipate Hitler's moves by looking at what they thought Hitler was looking at in terms of astrological transients. But I think they would have been lights years ahead of that approach by looking in depth at Hitler's natal chart, because if they had known the man in terms of the underlying structure of his personality and his propensities and weaknesses, they would have had a much more reliable picture of what was moving him to do the things he did - not the details, but the driving forces. They would have been following the advice of 30.6.

[wealth]

I would love to know more about the occult WWII, it seems that both sides used occult methods a lot: from the SS badge and the swastika to the 'V for Victory' sign--a runic symbol, if my knowledge is correct.

[gene]

That they did. And our own government today, in its hidden, underside, is just full of occult research, study, and what have you. This is part of the reason for the destruction of the museums in Iraq, is in search of ancient Sumerian documents, that defined the technology of the gods. Also, there is an intense search going on for the "Ark of the Covenant." Much more could be said on this.

Gene

[sparhawk]

That they did. And our own government today, in its hidden, underside, is just full of occult research, study, and what have you. This is part of the reason for the destruction of the museums in Iraq, is in search of ancient Sumerian documents, that defined the technology of the gods. Also, there is an intense search going on for the "Ark of the Covenant." Much more could be said on this.

Gene

That sounds like something Dan Burisch would say. Have you heard his interviews, Gene?

[gene]

No, I haven't heard Dan Burish, but it sounds interesting. I will try to look him up.

My sources are many and multiple, and I usually do not reveal them partially for that reason, and partially because I do so much reading and listening, all the time I can spare, that I don't always remember my sources. I couldn't tell anybody if I wanted to. Of course, some people accuse me of listening to too much coasttocoastam.com, and I do, but that is far from my only source, and I try hard to verify everything before I put it online. There are a lot of disinformation agents out there, and it is very easy to be fooled about what is going on.

Someone recently said, "oh, you had to have gotten that info from Zachariah Sitchen." Well, I have read some of his books, however, that doesn't even come close to being the whole story. What I was referring was common knowledge among genetic engineers and scientists. There is more to it than that however.

And much research has been done into the ancient Sumerian texts since Sitchin. Some of his work has been refined. There are many texts which the public, and to a great extent myself included, don't know anything about. But they paint a picture that is similar, but much more complex than the Biblical story of creation, and are completely changing the ideas of many people about mankind's origins.

Maybe someday I will put a partial list out here of some of the works that people can go to. There is so much however, and new stuff comes out every day.

In a similar vein, once a while back some one was criticizing the works of Graham Hancock, and I defended of his ideas, and this person assumed that I was into his work. I have never even read more than a few pages of his books, because there is a great deal of information out there that cooberates what he is saying. In fact, his ideas are not new, they had just dropped out of favor, and he revived them, and gave deeper insights into them.

This is why I often ignore requests for sources. I don't mean to be indifferent, but I read so many books, and so much info, that I often lose sight of where I go what, but usually, what I speak about has come from several sources, not just a few.

Anyway, glad you asked, I will try to look him up. The name does sound vaguely familiar.
Gene