sollina
May 31st, 2009, 08:27 AM
Hello everyone,
does 64 to 13 bode well for the potential of (a new, not yet established) relationship?
I see it as a positive sign which warns against being reckless and ruining things by being impatient and trying to rush things before they're ripe. The 64 ends with the bright line 5: "The victory has been won. Everything has gone well. All misgivings have been overcome. The new time has arrived, and with it good fortune (...) the new era appears all the more glorious by contrast with the misery of the old."
But since there are four changing lines, I am not shour how(if) to regard 13.4.6 as well. And they do not seem so positive. The 13 itself seems promissing, taling about fellowship and "peaceful union of men" and "organic organisation within diversity". The two individuals in question are from different countries so I see that as the "diversity" which is to be organised.
The non changing lines, however, speak of "dividing walls which cannot be overcome" (4)and about "being outside of fellowship with others" (6). It also says that "the fellowship includes only those who happen to dwell near one another."
Seems contradictory to the positive note the 64.5 ends with...
Thank you for the insights.
does 64 to 13 bode well for the potential of (a new, not yet established) relationship?
I see it as a positive sign which warns against being reckless and ruining things by being impatient and trying to rush things before they're ripe. The 64 ends with the bright line 5: "The victory has been won. Everything has gone well. All misgivings have been overcome. The new time has arrived, and with it good fortune (...) the new era appears all the more glorious by contrast with the misery of the old."
But since there are four changing lines, I am not shour how(if) to regard 13.4.6 as well. And they do not seem so positive. The 13 itself seems promissing, taling about fellowship and "peaceful union of men" and "organic organisation within diversity". The two individuals in question are from different countries so I see that as the "diversity" which is to be organised.
The non changing lines, however, speak of "dividing walls which cannot be overcome" (4)and about "being outside of fellowship with others" (6). It also says that "the fellowship includes only those who happen to dwell near one another."
Seems contradictory to the positive note the 64.5 ends with...
Thank you for the insights.