Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
The first consultation speaks clearly. The second and third pollute the waters. Polluted, and hence not speaking. --- from translation in Wikiwing
Line 1 also speaks of disciplining the student but not harshly - I wonder is this telling me to make clear to him that what he did that night (during the escalated fight) was unacceptable & uncalled for, point out that his view of these personality traits that he's accusing me of are stemming from all these previous miscommunications (that I thought had be dealt with) that I do care for him but maybe he needs to take a step back & view things for what they really are?
I really feel line 3 is telling me not to throw myself at him or give in to his perception of me because of him misreading things. Let him come to me, be wooed once again.
These all sound like good insights to take from the reading in terms of how to proceed.
And I am also wondering if there is something about the "protecting" aspect of Hexagram 4 --- That Yi is advising you to protect yourself. Letting him know about what kind of behavior you will not accept is a way to do this. And not giving in to his misperceptions of you is another way.
Are you familiar with the "transitional line" method that Bradford describes in his work and Ashteroid employs here in shared reading? I believe if you were to use that method your reading would look something like:
4.1 > 41.3 > 26.
I don't have the capacity that Ashteroid has for drawing out the hexagrams which looks so nice.
I also don't have a lot of experience with readings to know how reliable of a method it is --- but it makes sense to me. And so looking at the text for line 41.3 --- may it apply somehow to your situation? Is there a possibility that there is a third person in the situation that you do not know about?
And Newbie, I also want to thank you for posting on this forum because it is helping me to tangle with a question I have about whether to employ crosslines in readings (which I learned from Karcher) or transitional lines (which I learned from ashteroid who learned it from Bradford's work.)
What I notice is that the transitional line of your second question is part of the "line pathway" of your first question.
I believe the "line pathway" of your first reading would be 42.4 [25.4 : 26.3] 41.3. (I am trusting someone might correct me if I this is inaccurate.)
It is also interesting to consider the nuclear hexagrams. The nuclear hexagram of your first reading is 23 and the nuclear hexagram of your second reading is 24.
Does any of that have meaning for you?
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).