Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
what do you think should I do regarding the first and the llast question? I am pretty interested in the last teo questions more than the first to be honest
emotionally will I be happy in my personal life if I take this job? 20.4.5 > 35
is this the best option of employment regarding my personal desires? 45.1 > 17.1
I asked if this was the best opportunity I have in the nearby future?14.1 > 50.1
(added" for me") 17.1.3> 31
Well I mean I say emotionally as my emotions not for being fulfilled professionally I have experienced from the past months that working onto something didn´t make me happy just hide the sadness I had I was busy with things but my emotions didn´t improve... I assumed 18 was talking about not commiting the same mistakes as previous jobs to be nourished in terms of prefessional experience.so which one are you more interested in, the first and the last or the last two?
i'll look at the last two then.
not sure how else one can be happy if not "emotionally"? anyway, i'd read this as a sort of a yes, maybe not happy, but it will be progress. to me the answer seems to be telling you to ask yourself what makes you happy (the previous 18>27 seems to be pointing to need of nourishment, so in the broader view you might ask yourself if you want a professional life that supports your nourishment through money, so you can be happier in you personal life by heaving means to support yourself, or if you want a job that sustains your emotional needs, which might be more difficult to come by and 18 can be a wake up call to some form of sobriety on that matter, maybe).
looks like a pretty good option to me. don't understand why you post the fan yao in the result, 17 (not 17.1) is the result, if not the context. so going for this job might serve you well on your path, though not sure again about those personal desires.
the "for me" part is absolutely redundant. if you're into programming i suggest try thinking in those terms when asking Yi questions, though any logical operators other than "if" (more like "what if"), i.e. "and", "or" are only confusing in getting clearer results (also asking yes / no questions) and so is hitting its database with too many queries at once - it might get stuck. that helped me at least.
I took it it will be progress but it will be professional progress(not sure how that improves my emotions )
The IChing may say that this job may be the best opportunity available in the in the area at the time. But when the question includes “for me” it may reply “but you’d hate it”. I am not commenting on the lines, just how the addition of “for me” can change a question.
I want to know if it was truly the best choice currently I could have I dont remember if I asked the question with I have or without I have since I asked it in spanish (and it was like 2 days ago?) anyway I have received this response from the engineer/developer/recruiter/(not sure what was this position)? and He had contacted me 2-3weeks after I had initially been considered as a (main?) candidate to this position.. to me from a logical point seem they left me last given the experience, but I wonder if they even consider a lowball of a wag they offer worth me even considering their current offer, in the country where I am they underpay severely any kind of employee unsure if they do it as to keep a budget given the current country's economy or perhaps they just lowball as they can get more employees, I acknoledge a developer payment is higher than some other jobs but compared to other deals I have seen(it's like that other job they had an urgency for a dev and they paid the same as a local company, where they(most employers) dont pay health insurancefair enough, i think i see your point here, though the initial question was not just about the best opportunity in general, to quote Topher "if this was the best opportunity *I* have in the nearby future?" - for whom else in this case? unless the original question was rephrased for the forum, then ok, i get it now.
plus, it's just a suggestion, i understand everyone has their own process of reading changes.
plus, it's just a suggestion, i understand everyone has their own process of reading changes.
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).