...life can be translucent

Menu

43 unchanging

Grandma

visitor
Joined
Jun 19, 1970
Messages
385
Reaction score
6
I have rather a difficult question. I asked how can I prove something about a person. (It's something I suspect, nothing anyone has ever told me, I'm just going on intuition here) I got 43 unchanging. I migh t add it isn't anything positive if it is true. Can anyone help me decipher the answer, please?
 

hilary

Administrator
Joined
Apr 8, 1970
Messages
19,149
Reaction score
3,418
Sounds like - take the risk of coming out into the open with your suspicions. Not aggressively, but with a positive purpose in mind.

(Though I would double-check this with a follow up reading asking about the consequences if you did come out and say it. Just because this is the way to prove it, doesn't have to mean it's a great idea.)
 

bradford_h

(deceased)
Joined
Nov 16, 1971
Messages
1,115
Reaction score
63
Seconding Hilary's reading.
Do nothing out of proportion, no big emotional charge, no mountains out of molehills, just a "matter-of-factness" in both your inquiry and any disclosures you might make. And, if the person has motives, try to understand them.
 

Grandma

visitor
Joined
Jun 19, 1970
Messages
385
Reaction score
6
Thank you for responding. Hilary and Bradford are you saying that in this case it means asking the person themselves is the way to prove it? I think, yes, I should ask the follow up question you suggested.
 

dobro p

visitor
Joined
May 19, 1972
Messages
3,223
Reaction score
205
43 is about going public about the fact that you're decisively separatinig yourself from it and going in another direction.

So, considering Susan's question and the situation it relates to, it seems there might be two interpretations:

1 Announce your suspicions publicly.

2 Don't announce anything concerning your suspicions about the issue. Instead, separate yourself from this issue, because it isn't a valid issue.

Susan, because of the fact that you're going on hunches here, because of the fact that there's no evidence to back up any allegations you might make, my guess is that the second alternative is the one the Yi is alluding to.
 

Grandma

visitor
Joined
Jun 19, 1970
Messages
385
Reaction score
6
So, the I C is saying there isn't any validity to the question?
 

dobro p

visitor
Joined
May 19, 1972
Messages
3,223
Reaction score
205
Oh, there's *lots* of validity to your question.

What I'm suggesting is that there are two apparently valid interpretations of the result you got from the IC.

Now, if you think I might have spotted something useful, it's up to you to decide which alternative I outlined best fits your case. Hold each alternative in your mind for a while. Which one rings true?
 
B

bruce

Guest
I third Hilary's reading and thinks Dobro makes excellent points, too. Both saying something similar, as I read it.

Proclaiming an accusation can do irreversible damage, but if you are correct, and if this person can harm others, that presents the question of personal responsibility.
 

Grandma

visitor
Joined
Jun 19, 1970
Messages
385
Reaction score
6
Thanks for all the help with this. I asked the question differently, Does this person do this thing, I got 54, 1, 3, 6 -50.
Then I asked did this person ever do this thing and got 32.4-46.The reason I asked the last question is because I read the previous answer wrong and thought that 54 and those changing lines changed to 4.
 

Grandma

visitor
Joined
Jun 19, 1970
Messages
385
Reaction score
6
I was wondering if anyone could comment on the other throws, especially cause the second one I did I thought it changed to 4 so then I thought ok this thing probably isn't true but since it changed to 50 it seems like it might be true and it's a heavy thing. I don't know how to interpret in any in depth way. Thanks for any further help.
 

Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom

Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).

Top