Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
A
active8
Guest
Hi
I guess the other 52.5.6 thread is dead. In this case 39 "uphill struggle" is more accurately called "obstruction", the obstruction being that my friend has the worst case of ADD of anyone I've known plus the traffic noise, etc. BTW, an email convinced her that we can still talk, but no distractions, please.
I'm not clear on the article/post I've read here or at Great Vessel ( I think Bruce wrote it) regarding whether the relating hexagram is talking about the outcome or the situation. S/He said it depends on the question. Could someone please elaborate on that? Without me analyzing what is not spelled out for me in that article (one example was Rod and Amy in Kathmandu - it doesn't say "this is a question of type A so the relating hex probably describes the situation") let's just say I'm dense and need the "... for Idiots" explanation.
Thanks in advance
Mike
I guess the other 52.5.6 thread is dead. In this case 39 "uphill struggle" is more accurately called "obstruction", the obstruction being that my friend has the worst case of ADD of anyone I've known plus the traffic noise, etc. BTW, an email convinced her that we can still talk, but no distractions, please.
I'm not clear on the article/post I've read here or at Great Vessel ( I think Bruce wrote it) regarding whether the relating hexagram is talking about the outcome or the situation. S/He said it depends on the question. Could someone please elaborate on that? Without me analyzing what is not spelled out for me in that article (one example was Rod and Amy in Kathmandu - it doesn't say "this is a question of type A so the relating hex probably describes the situation") let's just say I'm dense and need the "... for Idiots" explanation.
Thanks in advance
Mike