Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
Further to Brad's observation, not sure what you train of thought is behind the question, however, there's one such sequence, attributed to Fu Xi but most likely devised by Shao Yong for numerological reasons. There's some information online. Check Steve Marshall's site.. Now, these different sequences are disassociated with the received text and had other purposes.
In the thousand of years since the inception of the Zhou Yi and then the Yijing, many exegetes and commentators have come up with their own sequences, such as the example Brad pointed at.
Shao Yong's sequence follows a binary logic, that is, it counts from zero to 63: 000000(0), 0000001(1), 000010(2), 000011(3), 000100(4), and so on. But I see where it differs from your idea, for example, in changing from 3 to 4, where the "two" digits making up 3 are changed by a 1 in the third position thus making 4.
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).