Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
Topher, you know we appreciate you, but I still can't understand a word of this.I was wondering if you applied xor to the changing line hexagram you obtained something something like the related hexagram since the fanyao has different hexagrams but I assume it cant be done it has to be the same hexagram. jsut i found curious that mixing both changing hexagram lines's name ended getting the related hexagram
hex 5 39 describes a well apparently ti is just the same result of using xor on the main hex changing lines
if you applied xor to the changing line hexagram
...how are you thinking of applying it to just one hexagram? What are you xor-ing this hexagram with?using xor on the main hex changing lines
A fan yao is a single line. One line is in one hexagram.since the fanyao has different hexagrams
...is that it? That each line in the first hexagram changes to a different hexagram?Well, the fan yao is a line in a hexagram... if there are multiple moving lines, the various fan yaos are in different hexagrams...
What can't be done?I assume it cant be done it has to be the same hexagram
Yes, you would use the binary XNOR operator in that caseAnd you can do the ‘opposite’ too: replace any-non moving line with a solid (yang) line, and any moving lines with a broken (yin ) line.
Now tell me again, what does 'binary' mean? Or does it have two (bi = 2) meanings? (only kidding)Yes, you would use the binary XNOR operator in that case
I don't really follow what you are saying here, but no matter. From the Wizard's mouth (Stephan Karcher's own words), about the change operators (CO):The relationship is not direct but indirect via change operators. What happens here, from the point of view of mathematical structure, is to fix the yin operator components, keeping the same structure in the reading 63.12>48, and open space for complementary information through the yang operator and the cycle created by 39.1.2>5 or 5.1.2>39.
I don't really follow what you are saying here, but no matter. From the Wizard's mouth (Stephan Karcher's own words), about the change operators (CO):
Yang CO - Inner Yang or Inspiration Operator describes the inner transformative aspects of a situation.
yes, I agree with the definition, but they are not just words with that general sense, they are also part of a cycle, that I didn't see Stephan Karcher talking about, ... and that they are almost like a messenger, a glue that connects "opposite states" of elements within a cycle.Yin CO - Outer Yin or Realization Operator describes the places where change occurs (DF - in the outer world, or?)
What happens here, from the point of view of mathematical structure, is to fix the yin operator components, keeping the same structure in the reading 63.12>48, and open space for complementary information through the yang operator and the cycle created by 39.1.2>5 or 5.1.2>39.
The question you raised may seem like something related to just another way to add information to the reading, but despite this appearance it has behind it a tool that integrates a more objective way, in what is possible, of highlighting a reading, which is part of a cycle, and its various components, often hidden and that help to meditate on what the reading wants to say.
yes, I agree with the definition, but they are not just words with that general sense, they are also part of a cycle, that I didn't see Stephan Karcher talking about, ... and that they are almost like a messenger, a glue that connects "opposite states" of elements within a cycle.
I understand that this topic may be obscure but there is much more to the change operator than Stephan Karcher disclosed.
breakmov
This is an interpretive tool you find useful and you find worth delving into more deeply. I'm not inclined to do so (at least right now), but as Sly Stone said, "different strokes for different folks" - and perhaps I might choose to delve more deeply into another aspect of a reading..... they are not just words with that general sense, they are also part of a cycle, .... they are almost like a messenger, a glue that connects "opposite states" of elements within a cycle .... there is much more to the change operators than Karcher disclosed.
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).