Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
Just wondering if anyone has tried this and, if so, what was your experience of the accuracy or inaccuracy of it...
Throw the coins three times to get a trigram... this would be the lower trigram. Then, instead of throwing the coins 3 more times, derive the upper trigram from the changing lines in the lower trigram.
Anyone?
What if there aren't any changing lines in the lower trigram ? Even if there are one or two I can't see how you make the upper trigram out of them ? Truly baffled Jack Can you explain how you do it, give an example ?
My guess is that you would repeat the bottom trigram... Remember what I mentioned to you the other day about creating a second hexagram out of a static one?
What if there aren't any changing lines in the lower trigram ? Even if there are one or two I can't see how you make the upper trigram out of them ? Truly baffled Jack Can you explain how you do it, give an example ?
I guess the idea is to take the orginal trigram and put the changed trigram on top of that?
For example, if you throw the fire trigram with line 1 changing, the hexagram is fire + mountain (change line 1 of fire) on top, hexagram 22.
Good thinking batman
I know this technique where a hexagram is the bridge between two trigrams. But I didn't know this one. But with what kind of question do you use this technique.
hilary said:Hm... what would it imply to create a hexagram this way? If the outside's all a product of the inside, does it mean that the only important influences and choices are 'in here', and they shape the world? A 'create your own reality' kind of casting?
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).