Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
Btw, if you are new to this it's probably best to start with Richmond. Lofting's work, based on a theory that he calls 'IDM', is much more complicated and most people find him a difficult read.
Personally I also believe that Richmond makes a whole lot more sense, but that is just me.
All of these different dimensional aspects of hexagrams, like shape or symmetry,
seem to have been used by the authors only when they were convenient sources of
images. You won't find a single one that was used with perfect regularity or
mathematical consistency, although a lot of scholars have wasted a lot of time
trying to make the Yi follow hard and fast rules of construction to bring the text into
line with their "Image and Number" theories and assumptions. I would suggest we
do the same - use the dimensions when they are convenient and they make sense,
or use them to try to stimulate new ideas. But don't demand a perfect fit.
The conclusion being, the Hexagrams themselves are largely arbitrary - one may as well generate two numbers between one and sixty-four in order to select which parts of the Yi to refer to.
Rather, the meanings in the Yi were chosen/selected/inspired according to their utility, and not according to an intellectual system. Not arbitrary. Meaningful. But not systematic, no.
To my mind the most systematic, consistent and useful analysis of the hexagrams was done centuries after the Zhouyi was written - that's the breakdown into component trigrams found in the Da Xiang. Some of them took a long while for me to understand, and that had to be in Chinese, but now they all make perfect sense to me. That at least suggests that there may have been something more systematic long before.
That's exactly the feeling I get, too, though there's some mileage in looking at all hexagrams with mountain above, etc, and looking for things their Images have in common. (Brad's book has an excellent section - whatasurprise - on the range of possible meanings for each trigram above and below.)Although, I'm beginning to get the impression that a Trigram is only fuzzily defined in and of itself, and meaning is largely granted through interactions between pairs of them.
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).