Interior conflicts Of mine And my partner: 53.3.5.6-2 and 18.2.3.6-2

[Valent]

hello bright people, I ask you for help because this response confuses me a lot. the holidays
(https://www.onlineclarity.co.uk/fri...lliday-i-need-51-1-2-to-40.30440/#post-290793)
went well, it was the right thing to do to go. on my return, E and I met, we talked for a long time, admitting limits from both of us. nothing definitive, it is clear that there is a deep connection between us which, however, finds it very difficult to make itself manifest in daily life. I asked IC what E's interior conflict is about our relationship: 53.3.5.6-2. And what mine interior conflict is: 18. 2.3.6-2 .... can you help me?
The only clear thing to me is that I have some work to do...
Thanks for your insights

 

[Matali]

Hello,
With 53.3.5.6 : it's strange because line 3 can mean that there is a relationship that won't last. On the other hand, lines 5 and 6 can mean that the relationship is not easy but that it will be excellent in the future, a love story... Two stories ?

 

[Valent]

Hi Matali, I don’t think there’s another story going on. He’s a young widower (it’s happen five years ago)...do you suppose is it related to this?
about line .3 I found Here

“This is an image of an aborted synthesis: we see Gradual Progress halted and dissipated in fruitless stagnation. Goose:Sensation and emotion under the influence of thought. Dry Plains: Infertile prospects: an area of futile speculation or endeavor. Wilhelm's rendering of "plateau" emphasizes a horizontal rather than vertical orientation -- reinforcing the image of no increase, no progress. Husband and wife: Union of thought and feeling, intellect and emotion. Child: The product, the ongoing evolution of thought and feeling within the psyche. Plunderers: Divisive, disruptive elements which bring about the separation of what is united. This estrangement brings a halt to the progress of the Work. Ritsema/ Karcher’s “Radiance flocking demons indeed” can represent inner complexes, phobias, compulsions, etc. The best course is to re-organize and defend yourself against further loss“

and this explanation made me think just about Inner conflict.

I’m thinking about the two related exagrams: 2- receptive: for both of us, but I don’t able to explaine why I fount that so intriguing

 

[Matali]

Oh yes, maybe it's possible, and that would be the cause of the slowness of your relationship, because both lines are positive for the futur