Nuclear / Mutual Hexagrams

[surnevs]

Couldn't edit #89. See attached file

 

[surnevs]

It may, of course, be a mere coincidence that the core hexagrams in the inner and middle section of the "Core of the Core Mandala" divide the remaining 48 hexagrams into six equal parts when projected into Shao Yungs Circular arrangement of the sixty-four hexagrams... (but: WHAT a coincidence !)

 

[surnevs]

Worth noticing is that it's the same hexagram-pairs of sequence to be seen in both Shao Yungs Circular arrangement and in the "Core-of-the-Core mandala", yet not in the same sequential places or sequential direction:
Shao Yung clockwise from Hex. 1 - the "Core-of-the-Core mandala" (sections A to M) [see attachments]

50,32 - 32,50 (D)
57,48 - 48,57 (C)
18,46 - 46,18 (B)
06,47 - 06,47 (G)
59,29 - 29,59 (M)
04,07 - 07,04 (L)
33,31 - 33,31 (E)
56,62 - 56,62 (F)
52,15 - 15,52 (A)
12,45 - 12,45 (H)
35,16 - 35,16 (J)
20,08 - 20,08 (K)
03,42 - 42,03 (K)
51,21 - 21,51 (J)
17,25 - 25,17 (H)
36,22 - 36,22 (A)
55,30 - 30,55 (F)
49,13 - 13,49 (E)
19,41 - 19,41 (L)
60,61 - 60,61 (M)
58,10 - 10,58 (G)
11,26 - 11,26 (B)
05,09 - 05,09 (C)
34,14 - 34,14 (D)
_________________

These two symbols show that Sections (A to M) in the "Core-of-the-Core Mandala" mirror each other from here.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

One more remarkable thing to notice: If comparing the upper half () with the lower half () it will be seen that the sequence of the pairs in respectively Shao Yungs Circular arrangement and the Core-of-the-Core mandala is opposite. Example: Section D in the upper part, 50,32 - 32,50 is reverse, while D in the lower part, 34,14 - 34,14 is following.
And G in the upper part is following, 06,47 - 06,47, while G in the lower part, 58,10 - 10,58, is reversed and so on with the rest of the hexagram pairs.

 

[surnevs]

See also attached pdf

(The numbers in the left vertical column 1 to 7 refer to the categories I - VII explained in #83 )

 

[surnevs]

I think it would be wrong to draw any final conclusions but have found too many coincidences in the Circular sequence of Shao Yung and the patterns found in the "Core-of-the-Core arrangement" to exclude the possibility partly that the "Core-of-the-Core arrangement" could be correct in its structure (as reached so far) and partly in that the circular arrangement of Shao Yung has kind of consideration toward a "Core-of-the-Core arrangement", the latter though too early to suggest. One can only look at the similarities pointed out here above and wonder - for now. Should it happen that failures or other coincidences be found I'll hopefully be able to return here for clarifications.

 

[surnevs]

I have made a short four-and-a-half-minute video to show what it is that I do wonder about concerning some coincidences between my Core-of-the-Core arrangement and the Circular arrangement of the 64 hexagrams made by Shao Yung, HERE.
_________________

Add.: I wrote four-and-a-half-minute but I'm going to expand this video along the way.
The address is: https://svenrus.dk/introduction.mp4

 

[surnevs]

In case some here want to follow my work with the Core-of-the-Core Mandala, the movie project, I've linked up to this in my Profile here on OnlineClarity (Profile postings I think it's called). It is easier for you to find than underneath a stack of important papers I guess...

 

[my_key]

Hi surnevs
Is there sound to the video? Only I couldn't hear anything.

 

[surnevs]

Hi surnevs
Is there sound to the video? Only I couldn't hear anything.

No, only text. The ideal representation would have been without text, letting the illustrations speak for themselves but I'm not that much of a genii
It's far from finished and I hope I can go on daily with a few additions.

 

[surnevs]

#96 On again, but this project will be ever-changing and adjustments in the representation will occur now and then as long as I can follow the Quest for the right Order.

 

[my_key]

Hi surnevs

You look to have made some changes to the presentation which I think made it easier to follow.

Reading it through I had hex 20 come to mind which speaks to the invisible patterns that are traced through the Universe. You place an emphasis on the patterns you see are not symmetrical. From my understanding, the Confucians did like order and structure but a Daoist perspective may be placed more in pattern and spontaneity, and links between nature and the cosmos without so much emphasis on the patterns being symmetrical.

The invisible patterns might well not be symmetrical in this world but contain a deeper definition of sequencing a bit like the patterns of relationship that was found between prime numbers and the vibrations in quartz.

 

[surnevs]

These are the two schemes:

​

I found, that if eight pairs of hexagrams, pairs like hex. 1 and 2, 63 and 64 shift only back and forth to each other unlike the rest of the hexagrams, are added with the other significant hexagrams, like the waxing&waining, Big trigrams and double trigrams, the symmetry would be established in the last case ie where section E and F has been wrapped around.
Example: When all of the lines change in hex. 1 hex. 2 will appear and vice versa. When all of the lines in hex. 3 change hex. 50 will appear, and hex 49 will appear when all lines in hex 4 change. When all lines change, the eight hexagram pairs that shift into each other are 1&2, 11&12, 17&18, 27&28, 29&30, 53&54, 61&62 and 63&64. Except for these eight pairs, all the other hexagrams behave like hex. 3 and hex 4.
In other words: by adding these eight pairs marked in black as seen above, symmetry will appear.
But I haven't reached that sentence yet.
And, not least: thank you for commenting my_key!

 

[surnevs]

These eight pairs I will call mirroring hexagram pairs:

​

But do they belong to the other peculiar or significant series of hexagrams, such as the big trigrams, double hexagrams, Waxing and Waning, etc.? (there are probably more peculiar patterns to be discovered, now or in ancient documents)

 

[surnevs]

To get a better overview I have started projecting the movie frame by frame into a PDF

 

[surnevs]

I don't know why I couldn't edit post #104? (For better to be able to locate it on my homepage I've changed the LINK to PDF )

 

[surnevs]

It's hard to explain, but I've reached a point where pattern consistency calls for restraint. I have decided to take a break to avoid getting sidetracked in my further search for logic in this lineup. Notified in case anyone follows my project. (BING translated)