Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
Seems really positive to me. I'd look at Hex 2 as fertile ground to make creative things happen. The moving lines I imagine are indicative to this employer that you have tried several creative occupations or jobs and there's been a certain element of struggle from which you've benefited. You are a good worker, devoted to your occupation, but have some things to learn and you learn well and fast, which becomes Hex 27, somebody who brings creative potential to the organisation in addition to tangible profit. Sounds like if they don't hire you, they are nuts.
I see it as quite conflicted, a deadlock. I can't see 2.1 and 2.6 as boding so well...seems like a struggle for resources.
i can see it from Arabellas angle too though
How do you see it youngmaid ?
Asked if she'd be interested in calling me in for an interview, got 48.1.2 to 63,
Asked if she'd be interested in calling me in for an interview, got 48.1.2 to 63, so don't quite know if that feeds into the negative or positive interpretation of this casting. I hope it's leaning more towards the positive though!
Are you sure their company or that individual is actually a going concern; that is, making enough money to pay you? 48.1 says the well [the source of income] has nothing but mud at the bottom.
If I got this reading I would decline any invitation to an interview. No point in taking the time to go, even if they asked you.
By the way, I think the line 2.6 is one of the worst lines to get in the entire I Ching. The dragons battle in the field and blood is shed. That's dangerous and I believe the I Ching is advising you to avoid the situation, if at all possible.
Are you sure their company or that individual is actually a going concern; that is, making enough money to pay you? 48.1 says the well [the source of income] has nothing but mud at the bottom.
If I got this reading I would decline any invitation to an interview. No point in taking the time to go, even if they asked you.
By the way, I think the line 2.6 is one of the worst lines to get in the entire I Ching. The dragons battle in the field and blood is shed. That's dangerous and I believe the I Ching is advising you to avoid the situation, if at all possible.
I don't know why precisely, but I'm with Ginnie here [read above] that maybe the employer is a bit bogus herself? I wouldn't run the other way, but that's two of us who picked up on this aspect that the potential employer may be in trouble or not entirely on board financially/contractually. Just exercise caution YM. You want to get paid, not volunteer!
Are you sure their company or that individual is actually a going concern; that is, making enough money to pay you? 48.1 says the well [the source of income] has nothing but mud at the bottom.
If I got this reading I would decline any invitation to an interview. No point in taking the time to go, even if they asked you.
By the way, I think the line 2.6 is one of the worst lines to get in the entire I Ching. The dragons battle in the field and blood is shed. That's dangerous and I believe the I Ching is advising you to avoid the situation, if at all possible.
THANK YOU ARABELLA!!! You're so right! Would've never come to this conclusion without your help!
Yep, seems like there's something shady going on with her enterprise, financially speaking at least, so, I'm really going to be incredibly cautious about it. I'll give blood to the Red Cross, but I'm not going to give blood sweat and tears to a company that won't pay me!
really ? I certainly wouldn't. Whats the harm in going to interview ? No use chucking away opportunites just because you think a reading says so. If it doesn't work out it doesn't work out but i don't see the use of refusing an interview if offered. With respect that seems like folly.
The question was 'will she 'invite me to interview ?" In short I'd probably take it as a no because I was seeing the answer as she sees you, Young maid, as 48.1.2...not very flattering but thats how I saw it.
I don't agree 2.6 is 'dangerous' either. Theres conflict somewhere but why should there be danger ? I'm not saying there can't possibly be danger...but there are other ways to see it
Haaang on.....why would you think they won't pay you ? Thats Ginnies and Arabellas interpretation but its not fact is it.
I first saw it as she sees you having little to offer (no offence) 48.1.
Just saying no use running with the idea she can't pay you..she may not but you don't know yet
You seemed keen to start with. Is there anything apart from the readings that leads you to believe theres something 'shady going on with her enterprise' ?
Again, I would just exercise caution, not cross it off the list entirely. Take your time because you want a job that lasts and pays properly. All's I'm saying is, if there is a negative side to this application/job, I think it's on her side, not yours. I think your resume is probably well up to what she needs. But I'm not sure SHE is up to what YOU need. That's what I get from the casting. Thus, the caution.
Yeah, I'll go to the interview if offered! I'm unemployed! No matter what's going on, I'll meet with her, for practice in the very least!
the initial 2.1.6 to 27 reading: like, fertile ground to nourishing
I asked another question:
What state are her business affairs in? 9.1.2.4 to 33
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).