Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
I was thinking how the 48.23 to 8 reading worked itself out on the Brexit vote - when I was sure it meant that Britain would remain in the EU, but the vote went the other way. I was wondering in the night how this same casting for the US election would play out. There were indeed similarities.
This thread will be a very useful tool I think for looking at answers in the future.
Thank you - and as Svenrus has quite rightly said, this is not about who has won, or political bias, it is to do with seeing how readings panned out. It will also be interesting interpreting the readings over the coming months.
hilary
I wonder about the personal aspect of these readings - if the answers are not only about what happens but also about how the particular individual asking the question should see it. Maybe I could take 42uc as personal reassurance - that the things I felt Hillary's candidacy represented are still on the increase.
Also - might unchanging for a political candidate mean 'not connecting with the electorate'? An abstract idea, adrift? Er... just looked at Butterfly's collation of previous readings, though, and both candidates had some uc readings. There have been three separate unchanging 25s for Clinton.
lisa
I suppose it might also be possible to see the 42 unchangings as somehow a blessing for Clinton personally, even though that's not how we meant our questions? (I mean, I don't understand why anyone would want to hold public office, so there's that fairly ridiculous bias...)
Problem is, when there are several mutually-exclusive ways to interpret a reading, we have no idea what it means, while nonetheless knowing that it indeed means something.
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).