...life can be translucent

Menu

What is a serious inquiry ?

dfreed

Inactive
Joined
Feb 6, 2021
Messages
1,045
Reaction score
411
I would think, if you follow the evolution of the thread ....
I'd really like to hear what Sven has to say, and to know who said this - and that's why I asked these questions. He's under no obligation to respond, but I'd rather communicate with him than follow threads or second-guess what he might be thinking or feeling - and as you said; you, I and others can add to this whenever (and however) we feel like it.
 

Trojina

Supporter
Clarity Supporter
Joined
May 29, 2006
Messages
26,994
Reaction score
4,499
You don't need to second guess if you read the thread.

If you won't read the thread why would you expect someone to explain what is in it. Why would you think the quote had to connect with the thread title when there's been a long conversation in between.

You say you'd rather communicate with him than follow threads but we are talking about this thread not random other threads. You are looking at the thread title and asking how the quote connects to that without reading the thread. Point is you could read the thread to see how it got to the quote.
 
Last edited:

surnevs

visitor
Joined
Apr 25, 2021
Messages
668
Reaction score
328
Trojina: You are right (#30)

Dfreed: You ask where it came from. Shortly: me
*. One could put it the way that there are two schools,
namely the Darwin'istic school that we have evolved from being animals until today being sophisticated animals so to speak ("Tool-animals" as I called it, in a reply to You earlier in this thread and,
that we have come from a separate / non-animalistic level and due to some catastrophe (being asteroid impact, tsunami, nuclear war etc.) have ended up being "Angels in animal bodies" (
#16)
This thread did as You said, Trojina, get expanded beyond the initial (attempt to express a -) poetic point of view (#1) on the Divination or Consultationprocess to a discussion toward the offspring of our beings in general and yes: also started by me.
Finally: I got this input (#28) spontaneously to sort of sum all of this up, also in a poetic way - which I felt OK

__________________

*) and I use to refer to the source when I quote (mostly, sorry if it should happen that I forget)
 

Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom

Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).

Top