Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
I asked "when" I could expect something...not really a good question, I know. The response was 18.2<52. Am I being told to fix what's wrong first?
I asked "when" I could expect something...not really a good question, I know. The response was 18.2<52. Am I being told to fix what's wrong first?
I feel you are being told that it is not easy to quantify a time, there are factors that require sensitivity ; it is not a hard and fixed situation.
"The mother's Gu": for me, these can be factors that are embedded, woven, integrated into a problem; you can't just 'pull them out'.
What do you think, does this make any sense?
Reasonable question! Maybe because taking the reading as a description of a personal quality of time makes it about you again: changes you can make, changes you're sensitive to, your own awareness of the situation. It gives something back to you that is taken away if all you can do is stare at a calendar and wait.I mean if we could get an actual ballpark date, why would we settle for something so broad as "When corruption is no longer keeping still?"
One possible approach to solving the "when" question is to put the names of the two hexagrams together in a phrase.
For example, "when unstirring removes corruption"
"When corruption resolves into meditiation."
Try different translations of the two hexagrams to see what fits. If we had the background here, we might be able to help more by finding the right phrase.
Meanwhile, Line 2 might provide a hint: From the Wikiwing
18 zhi Hexagram 52, Corruption Keeping Still – when it needs to be more responsive. 18 is not a time just to keep still and be with how things are; it may need to do this, but not as an ongoing strategy.
So maybe "When Corruption is no longer Keeping Still."
Tiger
I feel you are being told that it is not easy to quantify a time, there are factors that require sensitivity ; it is not a hard and fixed situation.
"The mother's Gu": for me, these can be factors that are embedded, woven, integrated into a problem; you can't just 'pull them out'.
What do you think, does this make any sense?
I asked "when" I could expect something...not really a good question, I know. The response was 18.2<52. Am I being told to fix what's wrong first?
Stem-mother's decay. No determination possible.
Reasonable question! Maybe because taking the reading as a description of a personal quality of time makes it about you again: changes you can make, changes you're sensitive to, your own awareness of the situation. It gives something back to you that is taken away if all you can do is stare at a calendar and wait.
makes alot of sense to me
Well, but then instead of waiting for time to lapse, you end up waiting "for corruption to stop being still"--whatever that means. I really think this is an issue of power. You are saying that if someone is told a timeframe, they will automatically stop "working" on themselves and the situation, kick back and wait for the date to arrive? That is about giving up your own power to someone who has provided you with an answer. We should never give up our power, that is understood, but what I don't understand is why no one is willing to address the real question: Can you tell time with the Yi?
If you ask me, the only way to answer this is by asking a 'when' question, obtaining a solid, calendar-based answer, and waiting to see if the answer is accurate. "Waiting" does not mean sitting idly by. It means getting on with life, following the teachings of Hex 15, but in following the teachings of Hex 15, remaining open to the possibility that the Yi may indeed be able to give answers in numbers.
Maybe I have missed something, as I'm fairly new to this forum. But it seems as if there is a certain amount of passive agressiveness towards certain topics...or perhaps people?
Everyone seems quite excited by this suggestion that by combining hexagram phrases, you can get an obtuse answer to a 'when' question, and yet none of you who have studied the IC are at all excited when someone answers with a direct date? I don't get that. Don't you at least want to know if that's possible or how they did it? Is this an old topic that has already run its course b/c searching the threads, I was unable to find it addressed.
Originally Posted by firehorse View Post
I asked "when" I could expect something...not really a good question, I know. The response was 18.2<52. Am I being told to fix what's wrong first?
Well, but then instead of waiting for time to lapse, you end up waiting "for corruption to stop being still"--whatever that means.
Yes, that's part of what I'm thinking. Also that it's about engagement - as Meng says, especially since this is hexagram 18, of all hexagrams. When you have a reading about a situation, this helps you to be more clearly and fully aware of its undercurrents.I really think this is an issue of power. You are saying that if someone is told a timeframe, they will automatically stop "working" on themselves and the situation, kick back and wait for the date to arrive? That is about giving up your own power to someone who has provided you with an answer. We should never give up our power, that is understood
, but what I don't understand is why no one is willing to address the real question: Can you tell time with the Yi?
If you ask me, the only way to answer this is by asking a 'when' question, obtaining a solid, calendar-based answer, and waiting to see if the answer is accurate. "Waiting" does not mean sitting idly by. It means getting on with life, following the teachings of Hex 15, but in following the teachings of Hex 15, remaining open to the possibility that the Yi may indeed be able to give answers in numbers.
Maybe I have missed something, as I'm fairly new to this forum. But it seems as if there is a certain amount of passive agressiveness towards certain topics...or perhaps people?
Everyone seems quite excited by this suggestion that by combining hexagram phrases, you can get an obtuse answer to a 'when' question, and yet none of you who have studied the IC are at all excited when someone answers with a direct date? I don't get that. Don't you at least want to know if that's possible or how they did it? Is this an old topic that has already run its course b/c searching the threads, I was unable to find it addressed.
See - the question has been asked, it's not being ignored or neglected. We're just also looking at other ways to see the reading.firehorse said:Out of curiosity, where did you derive the first week of October?
It's been addressed somewhat - at least, if you hunt around long enough you will find posts by Jesed sharing his method for predicting times. Yes, there is definite curiosity about whether this is possible or how it can be done -
BTW, I haven't forgotten about this. I'm slowly working through a translation of the source text Jesed uses for time prediction (also creating some graphics, etc.). Good stuff from Ricardo Andree. Whatever qualms I have about his dogmatic views, and the mix of evangelical Christianity with the Yijing, are obscured by some of the technical material in his treatise. Ricardo Andree is on record of being very accurate with the dating method he uses (as well as his students).
when you finish translating the source text, can you share it with us? Please?
Isn't that rather the point of the whole exercise, to try to find in yourself the truth of what the reading means?
Not when the question is WHEN.
There is a myriad of questions one can ask if one wants to explore a situation. "When" is very specific and again, I really think that the discomfort imposed by the mere idea that the Yi could answer in a solid, reliable and simple way is so great that the very possibility is being cast aside.
Mind you, I am by no means saying it can be done. No, I couldn't possibly come to that conclusion without giving it more of a chance.
deedeebird, with all due respect, you seem to lack a little imagination......if a corrupting influence is deeply embedded in the object of my inquiry, it is entirely possible that the question of "when" a desired outcome is going to happen, depends entirely on whether I am willing to get that corruption upended, force it from it's place, pick up the rock, explore the ugly rot underneath. esp if it has been there for generations, this is not a pleasant task. no time frame can be assigned
Frankly, I don't want to use my "imagination" when I ask a "when" question. You unwittingly create the idea that all answers are correct. If only one can use one's imagination to understand the answer, one will have an answer...That's true, sure, but the answer will only be as helpful as you imagine it to be, and don't forget that one of the key definitions of 'imagination' is "a creation of the mind, especially one based on a fanciful or empty assumption." I might as well answer all posts with completely made up bunk. Who could say I was wrong? Only those who failed to use their imaginations.
I have no problem with 'when' questions. Or calendar methods.
The I Ching, mystic oracle from the East, raises more questions than it can possibly answer, perhaps it should be renamed. Ask a simple question but get a lifetime of different and vague answers.
deedeebird, with all due respect, you seem to lack a little imagination......if a corrupting influence is deeply embedded in the object of my inquiry, it is entirely possible that the question of "when" a desired outcome is going to happen, depends entirely on whether I am willing to get that corruption upended, force it from it's place, pick up the rock, explore the ugly rot underneath. esp if it has been there for generations, this is not a pleasant task. no time frame can be assigned
Frankly, I don't want to use my "imagination" when I ask a "when" question. You unwittingly create the idea that all answers are correct. If only one can use one's imagination to understand the answer, one will have an answer...That's true, sure, but the answer will only be as helpful as you imagine it to be, and don't forget that one of the key definitions of 'imagination' is "a creation of the mind, especially one based on a fanciful or empty assumption." I might as well answer all posts with completely made up bunk. Who could say I was wrong? Only those who failed to use their imaginations.
if you approach using the yijing with a no-nonsense, give-me-the-exact-time answer I need, you are gonna be missing a great deal of its communication and I suspect you will not last long as a student of I Ching.
how th heck can anyone be sure WHEN some thing will happen? anything can happen in the interim. "there s many a slip twixt the cup and the lips."
and Hollis was not saying zen nonsense.......THATS what I was referring to when I said you had no imagination! you dont seems to have the knack, nor the imagination, for seeing beyond your immediate demands for a black and white answer. In case, you havent heard, the I Ching is not a yes/no tool. it doesnt answer "who" and although it may point to time frames possible, why in the world would saying that a response means ' no time frame is possible" indicate to you than all answers are correct? doesnt make sense.
Because I don't know any. Calendar methods. I'm not there yet. And. I didn't answer with zen nonsense, line 2 in hex 18 specially talks about it being difficult to make a determination.
I drew on my own exp with this line. Which is why I asked firehorse for feedback, to learn more, not to open myself to ridicule.
if you approach using the yijing with a no-nonsense, give-me-the-exact-time answer I need, you are gonna be missing a great deal of its communication and I suspect you will not last long as a student of I Ching.
how th heck can anyone be sure WHEN some thing will happen? anything can happen in the interim. "there s many a slip twixt the cup and the lips."
and Hollis was not saying zen nonsense.......THATS what I was referring to when I said you had no imagination! you dont seems to have the knack, nor the imagination, for seeing beyond your immediate demands for a black and white answer. In case, you havent heard, the I Ching is not a yes/no tool. it doesnt answer "who" and although it may point to time frames possible, why in the world would saying that a response means ' no time frame is possible" indicate to you than all answers are correct? doesnt make sense.
Neither does what you just wrote, but I'll use my imagination to piece it together.
Please understand that I am distinguishing between "when" questions and all other questions. "When" questions do seem pretty black and white to me, and if you are saying you feel otherwise, then great, just say it. You don't believe the Yi can tell time, good, at least you have stated your opinion which is more than most people are willing to do...which is my point.
Neither does what you just wrote, but I'll use my imagination to piece it together.
Please understand that I am distinguishing between "when" questions and all other questions. "When" questions do seem pretty black and white to me, and if you are saying you feel otherwise, then great, just say it. You don't believe the Yi can tell time, good, at least you have stated your opinion which is more than most people are willing to do...which is my point.
I have no problem with calendar methods, either, just dont believe they can ever be white and black. Sorry about your lack of understanding, but I cant help you there. you said that I was intimating that "all answers are possible" and that , based on what I had said, made NO SENSE hard to talk to you:bows:
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).