ICC: Depends on the version that you use

Hello World; Hope you’re all well.

Great topic! I believe each translation functions as a somewhat idiosyncratic “ink blot” created by each scholar looking at the same or similar ideograms that make up the name and text of the 64 figures. A dance ensues that reflects the highly individualized psyche of the author confronted with the images. His translation is an attempt to put into words his own impromptu choreography. And dance notation is a far cry from music notation. The latter representing a rather precise recipe; the former only a very good guesstimate.

Enter the inquirer with his/her own individualized psyche (a work in progress). As the “ink blot” is embraced a flood of associations follows–associations that may be as old as the dawning of his/her own consciousness or even as old as the dawning of self-reflection in the primate.

So I believe we are blessed to have so many translations despite the work they impose on us, especially for those of us who suffer OCD. During our search, chances are getting better and better (with better and better translations) that we will fall upon the translation that really fits–despite any associated pain (if we strive for total honesty with ourselves). And just because Karcher hit the nail on the head tonight doesn’t mean he will tomorrow. The way of the way is too complex for just one cartographer.

Thanks for the opportunity,
Dr Bob