Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
Interesting interpretation. And i am curious, can you tells us more about this - where do you get this meaning / understanding of the reading from?.... the reading says make your appeal from your childs perspective Obviously you shouldn’t ask the child but imagine it!!
I have some time to consider it and I am thinking I may just try to do my best in lieu of burning my parents retirement money.
So I asked: Respectfully, do I need to get a lawyer? (paraphrase I cant find the exact question) 4.2 to 23
I am tempted to think that I am being advised to go it alone.
A tremendously fresh, open line. Why should today bear any resemblance to
yesterday? If you have no set expectations, anything could happen. The challenge is to
hold and nurture this state of not knowing, not to be in a big hurry to fill it.
She has recently filed a request for order in court to change the custody from 50/50 to 60/40 timeshare.
Also - hang on - does this seem odd to anyone?
The judge said to get a lawyer so it’s a no brainer. They’re in charge listen to them.Interesting interpretation. And i am curious, can you tells us more about this - where do you get this meaning / understanding of the reading from?
Thanks, D.
Line 2 speaks of needing a fresh perspective like that of a child.
Hmmm okay but unless my reading skills have deserted me....Nope, not at all.
(you are thinking of line 5)
That the young one can manage the household is a picture of the young ones competancy.
and so forth.'You get more bees with honey.' A non-threatening and lighthearted attitude works wonders. Just look how children achieve their desires through an innocent and playful attitude that adults simply cannot refuse.
But it really ends up going from an equal split to one that's 20% one-sided. Besides that, I don't think I can - or have been asked to - second-guess anyone's motivations here, so I'll just stay with the question about hiring a lawyer.....I'm perplexed why anyone, ... would find it compelling to go to court to change the custody arrangement......by a whopping 10%.
Hmmm okay but unless my reading skills have deserted me....
Hilary says much the same thing, though, as I quoted.(And a bad translation at 'cafeausoul')
So I asked: Respectfully, do I need to get a lawyer? (paraphrase I cant find the exact question) 4.2 to 23
I am tempted to think that I am being advised to go it alone. I have constructed a good argument and compiled some documentation that is a strong argument against her request. But sometimes reason may not necessarily prevail in court. In this context what do you think 4.2 to 23 is advising? Thanks very much
Makes me think of the stripping of the orphan which is central in so many kid's books - Harry Potter to name just one...the Secret Garden...there's tons of them where the child is stripped of all the ordinary decision making people - and makes their own life in a more free way which ends up as fortunate.
I see your point, and maybe that's how it will end up in real life. The question was about hiring a lawyer, though - but I suppose it wouldn't be the first time Yi veered away from the question to say here's what the crux of the issue really is.the question involves a child there's a child in the answer
So I asked: Respectfully, do I need to get a lawyer? (paraphrase I cant find the exact question) 4.2 to 23
Good suggestion. Maybe for background? Or maybe a bit of a tweak, something like, "How can I best advocate for my son in this proceeding?," because then Herrmyte could act on the answer.Perhaps it would be helpful to ask the IC, "Describe what is best for the child."
To the extent I understand the line (which is far from well), that seems like it could fit. But it would all have to happen before the court date - and out of court. If he and his ex-wife are on speaking terms, maybe it could...he asked if he needed to hire a lawyer but if the decision is with the child he will not need to hire a lawyer. I don't think Yi veered from the question at all, it hit it head on. How to leave it to the child is a whole other matter. It could be that somehow, through the child, the matter becomes unnecessary, things sort themselves out.
So I asked: Respectfully, do I need to get a lawyer? (paraphrase I cant find the exact question) 4.2 to 23
I am tempted to think that I am being advised to go it alone. I have constructed a good argument and compiled some documentation that is a strong argument against her request. But sometimes reason may not necessarily prevail in court. In this context what do you think 4.2 to 23 is advising? Thanks very much
Or not...maybe it could end up that the judge will allow this to happen in court, with him/herself as mediator or something? Maybe the line, the "fresh, open" side of it, could also mean that the judge really isn't the grouch he/she appeared to be?But it would all have to happen before the court date - and out of court. If he and his ex-wife are on speaking terms, maybe it could...
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).