Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
I'm afraid that 38.3 is a frightening and inauspicious line. Unfortunatley, I have had personal experience of this line.
You will put something out there, and then you will watch as you are sort of trapped in an oppositional position. You will discover that you or your possessions have been seized or held in some way, and you'll be unable to back out as easily as you could.
I suspect that the 38.3 could go either way depending on my own attitude.
Well, I heard today that I have a second interview next week.
I just asked 'If I want to be offered the job on Monday, what do I need to do at the interview'
20 1 42
I'm not so sure about line 1
‘A child seeing.
For small people, no mistake.
For a noble one, shame.’
Don't make it too simple?
On Monday I will have an hour to prepare a presentation and they will give me the topic when I get there. Then an interview with three people.
I just asked 'If I want to be offered the job on Monday, what do I need to do at the interview'
20 1 42
Makes perfect sense. I expect that the presentation will be something about putting a communications programme in place for the whole company, so the 'overview' aspect of 20 would be needed.
I'm not so sure about line 1
‘A child seeing.
For small people, no mistake.
For a noble one, shame.’
Don't make it too simple? When you do an 'overview'' presentation, you can miss some detail.
And 42 - blessing / increase - show them how what you propose would be good for them?
fine for the Yi eh it doesn't have to get a job
Just some thoughts, I'm not so clear on 20.1 myself but i often do recognise when i get it that my attitude is childlike when it needn't be.
I'm not so clear on 20.1, either. I was thinking that during her interview time she is going to be required to prepare some presentation -- the theme of which she will only learn when she gets there? Personally, I think that is unreasonable, because an interview is supposed to work both ways. They are interviewing her, yes -- but she is also supposed to have an opportunity to interview them. And how is Ann going to interview them, when she'll be preparing a presentation and then apparently meeting with three people? Sounds like they'll have plenty of opportunities to view Ann under the pressure of time constraints, but what about Ann's ability to gain a view of this company?
or maybe you are right and she needs to keep it simple,.. either way I think keeping confidence is important here.
Ann, I get the feeling that ambition plays a part in this. By your serious attention on big images, competence and roles, you may be overlooking the more 'boyish/girlish' aspects of yourself, which people tend to warm up to easily. Let the small relate with the small, and the great with the great. There's more to happiness at a job than tasks we perform, there's also the comradery. Wise employers look for compatibility as well as work skills. Just a thought.
The interviewer was my polar opposite and I still don't know if I was seeing the real him or his 'interview persona'.
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).