Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
In other words, a form of expansion of consciousness....
Thus the superior person illuminates himself
With his bright virtue.
In my opinion, it is not about which interpretation is in the majority, but which interpretation resonates with you. When one says A and the others all say B, but A resonates then that is the answer for you, not B .Thank you both, ok so two conflicting answers let's wait for others to chip in.
True. Like to me my question was "will it be better to come back to Dublin" and this is the answer I'm getting, not a "shall I stop thinking about moving away". But sometimes Oracle seems to be giving more complex answers taking into consideration context and hidden meanings...but if it was saying "don't move" wouldn't for example hex 52 uc or even hex 32 uc be more appropriate? On the other hand even 33 uc can be interpreted twofold one as "withdraw! Move away" and second as "withdrawal unchanging" as in "nothing is going to change, withdrawal won't happen"In my opinion, it is not about which interpretation is in the majority, but which interpretation resonates with you. When one says A and the others all say B, but A resonates then that is the answer for you, not B .
Aren't you making things far too difficult for yourself? It seems you want to receive a certain answer (which is fine, of course) and you interpret the answers you receive from that desire.But sometimes Oracle seems to be giving more complex answers taking into consideration context and hidden meanings...but if it was saying "don't move" wouldn't for example hex 52 uc or even hex 32 uc be more appropriate? On the other hand even 33 uc can be interpreted twofold one as "withdraw! Move away" and second as "withdrawal unchanging" as in "nothing is going to change, withdrawal won't happen"
The text of the first line says:"When taking everything into consideration and possibly coming World War it will be better to stay in Prague?" HEX 34.1>32
The text doesn't really need an explanation, does it?Power in the toes.
To go forward brings misfortune.
Be confident of this.
You are right, of course. I am having hard time here since I arrived.Aren't you making things far too difficult for yourself? It seems you want to receive a certain answer (which is fine, of course) and you interpret the answers you receive from that desire.
You look at the answers as it were through glasses with coloured lenses, and the colour of those glasses is, "I want to leave Prague".
So - to go forward as in ''to leave Prague''? But my question was ''will it be better to stay in Prague?''The text of the first line says:
To go forward brings misfortune.
The text doesn't really need an explanation, does it?
Anyway, the toes by themselves have no ability to effect movement, you need the legs for that and they are not participating here yet. In other words, one cannot move here, trying this would be unfortunate.
The combination Heaven - Wind with a moving line at the 1st position in Heaven is about trying to force your way, being too rational, not having a good overview of the situation.
Wind's advice is to look at things in the long term, to draw up a strategy.
Heaven - Wind is also about financial matters getting out of balance, spending more than coming in.
All in all, my interpretation of this answer would be that it is better to stay in Prague.
Take what resonates and leave the rest
33 speaks on the theme of a conscious and fully aware withdrawal away from something that feels a threat to a place where you feel safer. It carries the weight of an act of purposeful self concealment. Yi advocates that retreat is best achieved by stepping back from the small within, the things that habitually and unconsciously feed your fears, to a place where you can be honest and trusting of yourself. It is influencing you deeply and forever encouraging you to meet yourself in a more accepting and flexible way. (nuclear 44)"When taking everything into consideration and possibly coming World War it will be better to come back to Dublin?"
I got - funny enough - HEX 33 UC. (I got Hex 33.4.6 in my previous thread...)
"When taking everything into consideration and possibly coming World War it will be better to stay in Prague?" HEX 34.1>32
So - to go forward as in ''to leave Prague''? But my question was ''will it be better to stay in Prague?''
Perhaps ''to go forward'' with ''Staying in Prague''? Am I doing this thing again (using the colored glasses?)
"When taking everything into consideration and possibly coming World War it will be better to come back to Dublin?"
I don't mean - at all - that he should pretend it doesn't exist, just that it doesn't have to be in the question. One option is to write it all down, talk to ourselves in our journals or our scraps of paper or even in our heads (but a written record is easier on the memory) - put all the background, considerations, and details there - but then ask a very simple question. "So, how should I proceed?" or whatever. Both you and Yi will know everything that went into it, but what you're asking Yi to do is crystal clear: show you how to proceed. Then that's what you look for in the answer. (At least unless/until you're absolutely convinced Yi's gone elsewhere.)It's important to remember that for the querent there was just the right amount of background and conditions.
Likewise. But there are lots of things that won't work very well for.Statements work fine - I have had some of my best responses from Yi simply by writing 'WTF' or similar at the top of the page,
Alright, but having learned (or seen someone else learn), maybe no need to repeat it.I think, too, it's important to recognise that avoidance of a pitfall is a learning opportunity missed.
From my perspective, if it exists then it's in the question, irrespective of whether it appears in the words of the question.I don't mean - at all - that he should pretend it doesn't exist, just that it doesn't have to be in the question.
All worthy advice of best practice. Sometimes life situations do not allow for such a calm, collected, civilised approach. Gripped by fears or panic, or other turbulent energies, there may be no time for such etiquette. Just asking any old question, as quick as you can may be the order of the day; which in these situations can be most supportive.One option is to write it all down, talk to ourselves in our journals or our scraps of paper or even in our heads (but a written record is easier on the memory) - put all the background, considerations, and details there - but then ask a very simple question. "So, how should I proceed?" or whatever.
In my experience, there are many occasions when I have been the weak link in the knowing stakes. (Yi knows everything, I do not). Rarely do I know everything that goes into a question. Perhaps if I did there would be no need to ask that question.Both you and Yi will know everything that went into it, but what you're asking Yi to do is crystal clear: show you how to proceed. Then that's what you look for in the answer. (At least unless/until you're absolutely convinced Yi's gone elsewhere.)
Agree.Likewise. But there are lots of things that won't work very well for.
Sometimes we can only learn from falling in our own pits. Hearing about someone else falling into their unique, albeit potentially very similar, pit does not always give the same learning. For me, despite seeing and knowing that other people have demonstrated how to avoid my pit, none of it sinks in until I have experienced my pit to the fullest. I have fallen into the same pit so many times in my life, that I have realised that part of the pit is the repeating of the pit. Learning is very personal and most often a gradual process of repetition. My EUREKA! moments have been very few and far between.Alright, but having learned (or seen someone else learn), maybe no need to repeat it.
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).