Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
.....
Or am I mixing two different things?
Hi Yick,
I don't think XOR or another line by line (bitwise) operation can give accurate anwers to questions like 'how does A do B?'.
)
Chris,
Why do you insist on calling Martin "Margi" and pretending he's a girl?
....
So what is a status of swapping trigrams now?
It is used in 'context as push' and I thought it is your basic method for deciphering line comments of IC
martin said:But to represent 'change' I wouldn't put one hex on top of the other. I would replace every line (4 possibilities, yin or yang, change or not) by two lines. That seems more logical.
Disagree?
This is how I understand pages about swapping and context. Is this system out of your interest for the future and you want to refine only XOR? It helped you to find your way to XORing in times when all you had were traditional line comments, but now it is obsolete?
I see no problems with the XOR interpretations given above.
So -- this work is still up for review but the 'with/from X comes y' works for me at the moment for representing trigram in trigram or hexagram in hexagram. The issue come in using XOR on these hex-hex perspectives in that the 27-ness of hex-hex is XORing both hexes with 27-27. On the other hand, at the dodecagram level is the qualities of 27 mapped to 100000000001 or 100001100001 or 110000000011?
"GIVEN a context hexagram, the XOR material lists all the properties/methods of such, how things will develop if one lets it flow."
does this refer to the quality matrix? Can the first half of quality matrix be read as history of situation and the second half shows how things will develop?
Yes, it all sounds plausible. But as you have pointed out many times: our consciousness can make nearly everything seem to fit.
martin said:That applies here, it also applies to the 5 hex example that I worked out in my post. We both see what we believe.
Yes, I understand the problem. A related question (moving from hexagrams down to trigrams instead of up to dodecagrams): I suppose that what you do with XOR on the hexagram level is for you also valid on the trigram level, but I never saw you XORing trigrams. Perhaps I overlooked it?
If you XOR trigrams how do you interpret the answers?
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).