Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
Ah, I see what you mean. In that case you can ignore everything I wrote except the last paragraph .
I think I'm not understood.
I'm no discounting the rest of the lines, and I surely count on the 2nd Hexagram derived from all changing lines. Just, there are times when there's one line from all changing lines that suits your present situation and in many cases here's the clue of what to do or not to do. In that case I go to the hexagram which is derived only from that changing line, only to complement the previous derived hexagram. Do you understand me now?
Not that the other lines are not 'important' or they don't suit the reading, but I found in many cases that some of the lines shows the past of the whole situation, and not that the past is not important, but ok I've got the lessons, now is time to look what to do. There are times when I derive many hexagrams, one for a changing line. However, that is my practice, there's no right or wrong in IC. Everyone should do the reading with his own inclinations.
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).