Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
splash of vermouth, with a twist.
guess you can tell i am not a drinker by that
Practical....
had you know the Secret of the Golden Flower?
Hope this could be useful for you
Besdt wishes
Heh - slice a lemon in mine.
Actually, that's a great question AM, and one I've been thinking about so much lately.
I've never got the hang of when to be passive and when to be active. But I guess it's this point of tension - a creative tension - between the opposites which seems to yield the best results.
Allow me to waffle a bit on this to see if I can get some thoughts in some sort of order...
I think very many of us think that anticipating an outcome or the New Age idea of "creating your reality" somehow fits into the notion of the Tao. I think there's a big difference between forcing the Universe into one's insignificant idea of what we need and actually learning to align ourselves to its Creative aspect. That can be going with the flow or jumping in there with both flat feet. Needless to say, it is the perennial struggle and very, VERY difficult. But slow steps can be taken towards that goal.
When you're investing so much of yourself into a singular reality, against perhaps the creativity of mutiple realities, or possibilities then it stands to reason that we are in a sense, forcing our subjective perceptions against the Universe - pure hubris. The results may be that we receive what we asked for, forced for, but at great cost to other possibilities that could have been birthed if we had stayed in the present. Which is why things so often go pear-shaped in our relationships or other aspects of our lives because we are so addicted to control and the opiate of our emotions. We refuse to listen to that small, still voice inside that whispers to us gently - "Er...No. Not yet." "Sorry, but you know this is not good." Or: "Did you see that little sign there? How about taking five?"
Looking at my past experiences where I thought I was doing ok, I was about as far as you could be from applying the perceived understanding of how to "disengage." I would say, right now, that true self-observation rather than superficial and occasional glance at ourselves is the first mode of handling those inner patterns and needs that get us into all sorts or trouble. As soon as you think you're about to say something, do something and generally replay the wired-in CD of our habitual patterns you have to take action right there and then so that the power is "switched off." Once that "CD" is spinning - forget it. You won't stop it. So, best to head it off at the pass by preparation.
We can only do that when we accept that we are often in denial (a 43 moment) and need a shock. These shocks keep coming because we don't learn. Once we learn the lesson changes. So, to stop repeating patterns is a service to others as well as ourselves where we think of our actions as being intimately connected to everyone and everything - rather like the process by which we tap into the IC perhaps.
I think we're all so governed by the habit of reacting rather than reining in the emotions for nano-second. But once we honestly see how robotic we can be from certain cues which seem to press all our bio-chemical buttons at once, then we can begin to take steps to counter it. That doesn't happen until we'ver suffered a bit - even then it's a tall order. It usually takes enormous strength of will and discipline.
We can think positive thoughts and flit around in a haze of warm, fuzzy feelings but this, on its own, doesn't address the core issues of negative patterning. (Nor does NLP despite what they might tell you). Really knowing yourself and understanding how you tick is the first step it seems to me. Then once you have an accurate appraisal of your personality (and most importantly, past traumas and how they distort your perceptions - we are all damaged in one way or another) you can begin to pin point the patterns as they appear in the present.
Then you can formulate safeguards i.e. watching yourself like a hawk but keeping that balancing act between being positive and fun and deadly serious when you need to be. In other words, thinking how our actions really effects others. After all, it is the actual effects of our actions that determine whether or not we are progressing or regressing.
The IC can really help here as it is big on being objective and big on seeing things are they are in their purest form, uncluttered by our own needs and projections. Hex 52, 41, 20, 5, 9, 15, 18, 47 and 62 are some of the clearest ones that seem to say slow, down LISTEN for once in your life and find your nature. Cool that restless heart and find out who you are so that you can be all you can BE. Stop rushing around searching for satisfaction in others while it resides in yourself. How many of us really believe that? Theory is one thing...
If it was easy I guess we wouldn't have ended up here. You don't really learn much by being blissfully happy just like we can't get to the higher simplicity of the Tao on a $500 dollar weekend on "finding your higher self." It seems we have to understand as much of the complexity of our own natures and how we interact with the external world as is possible in order to even see clearly thr choices we have before us. We can only see those choices by having the humility to acknowledge we know nothing.
Well, I really waffled on that one. Now I'll go and do the washing up.
topal
Just kidding, Topal. I enjoyed reflecting on all your thoughts.We can only see those choices by having the humility to acknowledge we know nothing.
So much of I Ching and the Tao is about finding the Mean, disengaging, stepping back, etc.
I'll take the shortcut to the bottom of Topal's waffling post:
Just kidding, Topal. I enjoyed reflecting on all your thoughts.
But, doesn't getting in sync with the Tao really boil down to just that: having the humility to acknowledge we know nothing? Doesn't this retreat from old anxious tapes, outworn reflexes or outmoded software, really come down to remembering that this is all jive talk? That even my greatest ideas aren't so great, and my accomplishments really don't amount to much? Isn't that the greatest relief from all those ties that bind? Isn't that the only way to still the chattering monkey long enough to actually be able to hear that still, small voice?
For me, this matter of reaching a comfortable plateau, the mean or axis, is often blown out of proportion, and perhaps out of context. In fact, it annoys me when people take such pride in their humility as to present themselves as always being in the dao-zone. I don't believe it. Not for a moment. People aren't made that way; not even so-called sages.
Is blowing your own horn out of the Tao? Not if you're a horn blower. Is being arrogant out of the Tao? Not if you're arrogant. Behaviorism which is suppressed for the sake of walking the mean misses the point of both good behavior and the mean.
The first step to levitation is to lighten up. Then I can laugh at my foolish tapes, and lose interest in listening to them.
more so about exaggerations and restoration of balance and so covers dynamics of 01,02 11,12 29,30 63,64.
01,02 11,12 pair have a subtle biases to a zero-sum game. To restore balance overall, with no clear 'winners/losers', just balance then (a) identify the hexagram that best fits the situation and then (b) identify its 63-ness. 63 covers completion and as such includes restoration of balance, we have come up/down from the low/high to 'complete' - this completion is all encompassing such that it serves to finish all - no one wins or loses, all is 'back to normal' as such.
Its like a joke - if you know the punch line you can walk away from what leads to it, the tension, surprise etc etc etc The punch line gets everyone to laugh/cry but knowing it 'neutralises' all. (12 covers neutralising from a 'you win' position where winning is in holding off the attacks of others and so validating one's belief, the one you are fighting to protect. 11 covers harmonising, mediation for the sake of getting off on the skill and so 'you win'. 01 covers really getting off on the skill! 02 covers devotion to another (and so the intensity, competitiveness of 12 is transformed into cooperativeness, the volume turned down (or in a negative perspective, total darkness))
64 covers intentionally remaining open, avoiding closure (included in that is mis-sequencing, getting steps wrong and so tail wet, lack in precision, we delay closure for more info) --- this is akin to putting everyone on 'hold' (64-ness) as compared to closing off all (63-ness).
so -- given your concerns the focus is more on the dynamics of 63/64.
29/30 cover group dynamics - 29 to protect (issues of rejection/rejecting) 30 to exploit (issues of acceptance/accepting) - IOW being 'in' a group is a form of balancing even if the group in relation to others is extreme.
Note that 63/64 'entangle' 29/30 natures as 11/12 'entangle' 01/02 natures.
the 63-ness focus is to XOR 63 with the hexagram covering the situation. Thus if the focus is on 01 then the 63-ness is described by 64 - remain open, avoid closure here and balance will be restored since 01 is an extreme state, you need to delay its ability to express or more so allow the energy to dissipate and so 'complete' ;-)
OTOH the 63-ness of 02 is .... 63. The focus here is on a need to complete to restore balance, being too 'yin' is an extreme state as being too 'yang' is an extreme state - 02 covers excess openness and so completion is closure. 01 covers excess high energy and so completion is dissipation of such (dont dam it up, let it flow and so calm down)
You dont know how to XOR? - see http://members.iimetro.com.au/~lofting/myweb/introXOR.html
I think it's simply a matter of being fully yourself. Refinement is a work of art, but conformity and suppression of true nature is blasphemy, which robs the art and artist of their authenticity.
We're all a work in progress. There is no finish line, that I'm aware of.
Being fully myself seems to have gotten me to a point I do not like, which is not helping me deal with my long distance relationship, and more importantly, not helping me digest or put into action what I am gleaning from the Yi.
I look at the universe as a Giant Fractal, or really, many intersecting Giant Fractals, made of patterns temporal and spatial, historical and cultural, and personal and biological etc -- if we only have the wisdom or insight to perceive them. I look at I Ching divination as a way of lifting the curtain of our ignorance/myopia which hides the Giant Fractal, so that we can see just a bit more of the pattern. For perceiving patterns is a definition of intelligence.
I respect that. But if you must be something other than fully yourself to make progress with this relationship (or anything else), can that ever be a good thing in the long run? Won't the facade fall off at some point? And then what?
You, as well as anyone, should pursue your own interests in such things as you’ve described. Sounds very interesting to me. This comes from fully yourself, doesn’t it? And your passion to seek and find it is equally all you. Follow your bliss, as Joseph Campbell has said. That’s all I’m saying too. There is no one-size-fits-all, where this is concerned. You have to find and/or create your own.
Your original question asked for practical techniques for disengaging. There are many, as I’m sure you’re aware. Yoga, walking, working out; those are all techniques, which work for some. But what often happens is that we don’t disengage from the source of our conflicts, we merely find diversions from them, and those diversions can do more to mask our problems than to cure them. I’m quite sure you’re aware of this, also.
I’m afraid I know of no shortcuts, or at least ones which last. We carve our life out as we go, and we do the best we can with who we genuinely are.
An infant is most fully him/herself, but it's not the best way to go about in the world as a grown-up -- despite any nostalgia about the pure beingness of infanthood. (We've got an infant in the White House and look at the havoc being wrought in the world...but I digress.) To cultivate a little more detachment will empower me and stop the thinking thinking thinking about a problem/situation when is not actually productive or enlightening. And when the I Ching is telling me left and right to step back, wait, have faith, disengage from the doubts, I want to at least try.
"pray with a feather, not a pickaxe".
An infant is most fully him/herself, but it's not the best way to go about in the world as a grown-up -- despite any nostalgia about the pure beingness of infanthood. (We've got an infant in the White House and look at the havoc being wrought in the world...but I digress.) To cultivate a little more detachment will empower me and stop the thinking thinking thinking about a problem/situation when is not actually productive or enlightening. And when the I Ching is telling me left and right to step back, wait, have faith, disengage from the doubts, I want to at least try.
I do not know where you all got this idea that I am trying to out-holy anybody, even myself (not difficult...if y'all even knew... ) I'm not uptight so much as I'm trying to cultivate some patience and to not get to het up about things, for my own sake and in order to allow the Yi or the Great Fractal to show me that indeed, things are going to work out in time. Wallowing in my doubts is not useful -- going round and round in my head is not productive. Exercise is a great idea, and trying to turn off the tapes somehow is what I want to do. Vermouth is not a good idea...
Saw a billboard for a VW: "Misery has plenty of company -- try happiness."
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).