Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
I guess I'm glad that my poorly-listed bibliography enry has been removed entirely,
despite all the work that has been appropriated from my own books.
A lot of work went into assigning the Mathews and Karlgren numbers and the radical+strokes feature to all of the characters. I know that you felt free to just copy these, but they carry with them characteristics of my own design that can be found nowhere else. For example, the Mathews numbers 8000 and up. Credit where due is a simple courtesy, especially with something that saves you hundreds of hours of work.
I guess I mentioned the morally aspect: (But I surely don't like the Idea that someone makes others effort into plain bussiness, if that's the case)
- and if the www isn't open (really) what's the use then ?
In the rest I agree with You
So, you recognize the fact that your translation is based on Bradford's work (among others) but removed the reference to his work in your bibliography; you also recognize the fact that you used at least 11 times Bardford's unique work without proper reference. Even though, you are "baffled" by his reaction and you tried to put the blame on Bradford.
Well, it seems your moral (and legal) compass is broken. Supporting in any way yijingdao under this context is to go against everything the Yijing and the Dao stand for.
[/COLOR][/I]- and if the www isn't open (really) what's the use then ?
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).