Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Dear all,
This is a continuation of my post "help! hexagram 32 (relationship)", but as it concerns another response from the Yi, I have started a fresh thread. Again I will be really glad of your thoughts and insights. Sorry this one is very peicemeal.
I asked the Yi,
"Please tell me if I am right to press on single mindedly in this direction given that I feel very weak and sad in the immediate situation. "
The Yi responded with hex 30.6
I am not really sure of the meaning of this hexagram. I can see a number of elements, but have difficulty understanding the basic idea:
Li stands for Fire, and for nature in its radiance (Wilhelm). This is doubled - so there is some sense of something being twice bright.
Willhelm's commentary on the judgement seems to focus the reader on the idea of the source of perseverence. So he says:
A luminous thing giving out light must have within itself something that perseveres; otherwise it will in time burn itself out
In the human sphere it appears to indicate "clinging to what is right" (Wilhelm). The sense of right appears to be to depend "upon the harmonious and beneficent forces of the cosmos" (Wilhelm)
(I am not sure what the two fold clarity of the dedicated man is?)
The attitude suggested by Wilhelm is of one of "cultivating in himself an attitude of compliance and voluntary dependence, man acquires clarity without sharpness and finds his place in the world."
IC+ commentary gives the meaning of Li as Guiding. The sense here seems to be, that the source of the brightness is the intellect (in it original sense) as a faculty able to discern being from nonbeing or truth from untruth. And from this - the idea of Guiding.
This seems consistent with the points made by Wilhelm.
My question is what relationship does this have with the question I asked of the Yi!?!
In my question to the Yi, I referred to the immediate situation. I should explain what this is.
I feel a little bad writing about it in detail, because you might not want to know all these things. But on the other hand I cant see that its possible to give a good insight into the Yi's answer without sharing with you what I know. So I will press on in a spirit of professionalism.
The immediate situation is that the other person she loves has just been there for a few days, and now left. And as a result we have both been feeling a little alienated, and stressed. Niether she nor I, felt like talking to each other today, sensing we wouldnt feel easy together.
Indeed its not easy to talk when you cant see a solution. All you end up with is situation of heaviness, which neither enjoys. But niether of us could face ending the day without contact also. I didnt make contact, and this offended her a little, thinking she might lose me. ("I thought you would refuse to talk to me")
So we had a dismal, moody conversation. We both said we dont want anything heavy, and dont like making each other sad. She said (I will summarise), I dont want you to go away from me. Being with you makes me happy. But dont want to take responsibility for your sadness. If you come here, come because you want to be here, because I cant bear for you to be sad."
This made me feel as if at this point the relationship was really overburdened. So I renewed my earlier question to the Yi in the light of this development.
Back to the Yi -
The changing line is 6.
The king uses him to march forth and chastise.
Then it is best to kill the leaders
And take captive the followers. No blame
Again, I am really puzzled as to the meaning or advice I should take from this. My sense from Wilhelm is that it indicates an action of fine distinction, being decisive yet knowing where to stop. In some sense also it is a moderate action (not killing all of them). In essence it may mean, "to cut out the heart of a problem is enough"
But I am puzzled by the martial metaphor here. Clearly the Yi intends the flavour given by this metaphor. The image of 30.6 appears to be about quelling a rebellion, within a political context perhaps? The sense of it may be of not alienating by too draconian an action.
In this drama there 4 players, the king, the "him" the leaders and the followers. If this understood as an inner parable, then the king is one who has righteous authority (self, Tao, true knowledge - perhaps) and the "Him" is one who faithfully conducts the Kings authority (inner clarity?). The rebels are those powers in obstruct what is radiant.
Alternatively, the image may apply to a situation in the external world. However I dont see, a rebellion or someone in need of chatisement. The actors in my drama are myself, her and him. My sense is not to apply it literally. But you may see something I have not.
The limit of my clarity on 30.6 seems to be "cut out the heart of this problem but dont act in too harsh a way". I dont know if this is what it is saying? But whatever the real meaning is, I guess it must be within the context of "Li". And this, is a puzzle.
Usually I find the IC+ comments incredibly illuminating. But Chris' words on 30.6 about the body not being needed, puzzle me.
From a position of strength, one enforces discipline through removing the head. Once done there is no need for the body. No harm in this
Leaving the point about the body aside, does it mean, that I should pursue this singlemindedness from a position of strength and not feel weak (as I have been)?
I feel like I could be completely missing the point here!
As for the second Hexagram - 55. Fullness always sounds good!
Abundance has success.
The king attains abundance.
Be not sad.
Be like the sun at midday.
This would fit well with my tentative interpretation of Chris's comment on line 6 of 30. Perhaps the meaning is "pull your socks up, being sad will not help, but being bright will"
Or it may mean that acting as suggested by Li will produce abundance? Clearly, abundance is what we dont have in this current situation!
I am not sure if the second Hexagram should be taken as further guidance, or merely as a result of following the first? Since it contains a judgement, I guess it intends guidance.
In H55 Li also appears (Wilhelm) in the form of inner clarity, but here it is combined with movement or action. This produces abundance.
Chris's comments again are helpful
"once one has reached a peak, it follows that we head towards the down cycle. Here, tension is at it's peak pending a conscious release and these 'social outbreaks' need controlling - An arousing influence with guidance"
This seems to reflect parts of my situation. There has been a peak, and there is stress which needs channelling or guiding in the right direction.
I am not sure therefore if the meaning to take is: to deal with this burdened situation you must guide with strength and be an uplifting influence - ?
Another puzzling point is that H55 seems to have a connection with punishment
Clarity [Li] within makes it possible to investigate the facts exactly, and shock [Chên] without ensures a strict and precise carrying out of punishments. (Wilhelm)
Exact investigation of facts and appropriate action - are understandable instructions.
However, I am not sure how or whether the idea of punishment fits in this situation. I guess it has a metaphorical rather than literal significance, as I am not in the position of a sentencer. Therefore I turn to the essential idea of punishment for guidance. The essential idea of punishment is perhaps an action to correct something that has strayed from its path. (?)
So perhaps I should ask myself, if something has strayed from its path, and needs correction? Again, is it one of us who has strayed from the right way and needs correction? Or is it something within?
Again I am not sure if Iam wildly off track here. It could be that this aspect of "punishment, law suits etc" is not part of the Yi's advice to me, since it appears to have a more peripheral status in the hexagrams meaning.
My vague sense of this response of the Yi to my question is:
The general idea is: Yes, persevere in what you have set yourself. Strength to persevere comes from inner clarity /being joined with what is "right". The guidance of which dispells all doubts and is radiant (joyful).
Line 6 specifically: It is necessary not to throw the baby out with the bath water! But the rebels (ie adhering to something wrong, unclear, confused?) must be dealt with.
From acting in this way comes (H55) Abundance in which movement/ action are combined with clarity. From this abundance one should be able to act as an uplifting influence on the downward (rebellious/disharmonious?) effects which are now operating.
Phew! Any thoughts???
This is a continuation of my post "help! hexagram 32 (relationship)", but as it concerns another response from the Yi, I have started a fresh thread. Again I will be really glad of your thoughts and insights. Sorry this one is very peicemeal.
I asked the Yi,
"Please tell me if I am right to press on single mindedly in this direction given that I feel very weak and sad in the immediate situation. "
The Yi responded with hex 30.6
I am not really sure of the meaning of this hexagram. I can see a number of elements, but have difficulty understanding the basic idea:
Li stands for Fire, and for nature in its radiance (Wilhelm). This is doubled - so there is some sense of something being twice bright.
Willhelm's commentary on the judgement seems to focus the reader on the idea of the source of perseverence. So he says:
A luminous thing giving out light must have within itself something that perseveres; otherwise it will in time burn itself out
In the human sphere it appears to indicate "clinging to what is right" (Wilhelm). The sense of right appears to be to depend "upon the harmonious and beneficent forces of the cosmos" (Wilhelm)
(I am not sure what the two fold clarity of the dedicated man is?)
The attitude suggested by Wilhelm is of one of "cultivating in himself an attitude of compliance and voluntary dependence, man acquires clarity without sharpness and finds his place in the world."
IC+ commentary gives the meaning of Li as Guiding. The sense here seems to be, that the source of the brightness is the intellect (in it original sense) as a faculty able to discern being from nonbeing or truth from untruth. And from this - the idea of Guiding.
This seems consistent with the points made by Wilhelm.
My question is what relationship does this have with the question I asked of the Yi!?!
In my question to the Yi, I referred to the immediate situation. I should explain what this is.
I feel a little bad writing about it in detail, because you might not want to know all these things. But on the other hand I cant see that its possible to give a good insight into the Yi's answer without sharing with you what I know. So I will press on in a spirit of professionalism.
The immediate situation is that the other person she loves has just been there for a few days, and now left. And as a result we have both been feeling a little alienated, and stressed. Niether she nor I, felt like talking to each other today, sensing we wouldnt feel easy together.
Indeed its not easy to talk when you cant see a solution. All you end up with is situation of heaviness, which neither enjoys. But niether of us could face ending the day without contact also. I didnt make contact, and this offended her a little, thinking she might lose me. ("I thought you would refuse to talk to me")
So we had a dismal, moody conversation. We both said we dont want anything heavy, and dont like making each other sad. She said (I will summarise), I dont want you to go away from me. Being with you makes me happy. But dont want to take responsibility for your sadness. If you come here, come because you want to be here, because I cant bear for you to be sad."
This made me feel as if at this point the relationship was really overburdened. So I renewed my earlier question to the Yi in the light of this development.
Back to the Yi -
The changing line is 6.
The king uses him to march forth and chastise.
Then it is best to kill the leaders
And take captive the followers. No blame
Again, I am really puzzled as to the meaning or advice I should take from this. My sense from Wilhelm is that it indicates an action of fine distinction, being decisive yet knowing where to stop. In some sense also it is a moderate action (not killing all of them). In essence it may mean, "to cut out the heart of a problem is enough"
But I am puzzled by the martial metaphor here. Clearly the Yi intends the flavour given by this metaphor. The image of 30.6 appears to be about quelling a rebellion, within a political context perhaps? The sense of it may be of not alienating by too draconian an action.
In this drama there 4 players, the king, the "him" the leaders and the followers. If this understood as an inner parable, then the king is one who has righteous authority (self, Tao, true knowledge - perhaps) and the "Him" is one who faithfully conducts the Kings authority (inner clarity?). The rebels are those powers in obstruct what is radiant.
Alternatively, the image may apply to a situation in the external world. However I dont see, a rebellion or someone in need of chatisement. The actors in my drama are myself, her and him. My sense is not to apply it literally. But you may see something I have not.
The limit of my clarity on 30.6 seems to be "cut out the heart of this problem but dont act in too harsh a way". I dont know if this is what it is saying? But whatever the real meaning is, I guess it must be within the context of "Li". And this, is a puzzle.
Usually I find the IC+ comments incredibly illuminating. But Chris' words on 30.6 about the body not being needed, puzzle me.
From a position of strength, one enforces discipline through removing the head. Once done there is no need for the body. No harm in this
Leaving the point about the body aside, does it mean, that I should pursue this singlemindedness from a position of strength and not feel weak (as I have been)?
I feel like I could be completely missing the point here!
As for the second Hexagram - 55. Fullness always sounds good!
Abundance has success.
The king attains abundance.
Be not sad.
Be like the sun at midday.
This would fit well with my tentative interpretation of Chris's comment on line 6 of 30. Perhaps the meaning is "pull your socks up, being sad will not help, but being bright will"
Or it may mean that acting as suggested by Li will produce abundance? Clearly, abundance is what we dont have in this current situation!
I am not sure if the second Hexagram should be taken as further guidance, or merely as a result of following the first? Since it contains a judgement, I guess it intends guidance.
In H55 Li also appears (Wilhelm) in the form of inner clarity, but here it is combined with movement or action. This produces abundance.
Chris's comments again are helpful
"once one has reached a peak, it follows that we head towards the down cycle. Here, tension is at it's peak pending a conscious release and these 'social outbreaks' need controlling - An arousing influence with guidance"
This seems to reflect parts of my situation. There has been a peak, and there is stress which needs channelling or guiding in the right direction.
I am not sure therefore if the meaning to take is: to deal with this burdened situation you must guide with strength and be an uplifting influence - ?
Another puzzling point is that H55 seems to have a connection with punishment
Clarity [Li] within makes it possible to investigate the facts exactly, and shock [Chên] without ensures a strict and precise carrying out of punishments. (Wilhelm)
Exact investigation of facts and appropriate action - are understandable instructions.
However, I am not sure how or whether the idea of punishment fits in this situation. I guess it has a metaphorical rather than literal significance, as I am not in the position of a sentencer. Therefore I turn to the essential idea of punishment for guidance. The essential idea of punishment is perhaps an action to correct something that has strayed from its path. (?)
So perhaps I should ask myself, if something has strayed from its path, and needs correction? Again, is it one of us who has strayed from the right way and needs correction? Or is it something within?
Again I am not sure if Iam wildly off track here. It could be that this aspect of "punishment, law suits etc" is not part of the Yi's advice to me, since it appears to have a more peripheral status in the hexagrams meaning.
My vague sense of this response of the Yi to my question is:
The general idea is: Yes, persevere in what you have set yourself. Strength to persevere comes from inner clarity /being joined with what is "right". The guidance of which dispells all doubts and is radiant (joyful).
Line 6 specifically: It is necessary not to throw the baby out with the bath water! But the rebels (ie adhering to something wrong, unclear, confused?) must be dealt with.
From acting in this way comes (H55) Abundance in which movement/ action are combined with clarity. From this abundance one should be able to act as an uplifting influence on the downward (rebellious/disharmonious?) effects which are now operating.
Phew! Any thoughts???
Last edited: