Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
I have been feeling the need to take a few steps back from a situation, and turned to the Yi for confirmation or infirmation. The answer was 12.3. It changes to 33, so I took that as a yes, retreat.
But 12.3 got me thinking. It has various translations. Wilhelm translates it as "they bear shame"; this is also the translation chosen by Javary and Faure. Karcher translates it as "wrapped offerings" - a very different perspective,though still one that counsels holding back. Bradford's translation is "embracing the unworthy" - the accent being on indiscriminate behaviour. I don't have Huang handy at the moment, so I don't know how he translates it.
The situation I am involved in has no "shame" involved - at least not for me. The only unworthiness might be in following a wrong route through precipitate or insistent action (hence my feeling that I needed to step back at the moment). Karcher's translation makes the most sense to my own situation. Yet I see Karcher's translation repeatedly cricised on this forum, and there have been times where the shame aspect of 12.3 applied perfectly (in other situations).
How do you see 12.3? Have you ever drawn it in a situation where you didn't see "shame" or "unworthiness"? Could it refer to the other person involved? (In my case, this would make sense, despite asking about what my own actions should be.). Should I be picking and choosing translations like this when I can't figure out a hexagram's application to my own case - or should I stick to the one I first decide to read for that draw, with the risk, sometimes, of bending the situation to match the translation? (this is a wider question than 12.3, I realise).
Of course, it's possible the Yi was simply saying - you're asking a silly question, go with your feeling and retreat
But 12.3 got me thinking. It has various translations. Wilhelm translates it as "they bear shame"; this is also the translation chosen by Javary and Faure. Karcher translates it as "wrapped offerings" - a very different perspective,though still one that counsels holding back. Bradford's translation is "embracing the unworthy" - the accent being on indiscriminate behaviour. I don't have Huang handy at the moment, so I don't know how he translates it.
The situation I am involved in has no "shame" involved - at least not for me. The only unworthiness might be in following a wrong route through precipitate or insistent action (hence my feeling that I needed to step back at the moment). Karcher's translation makes the most sense to my own situation. Yet I see Karcher's translation repeatedly cricised on this forum, and there have been times where the shame aspect of 12.3 applied perfectly (in other situations).
How do you see 12.3? Have you ever drawn it in a situation where you didn't see "shame" or "unworthiness"? Could it refer to the other person involved? (In my case, this would make sense, despite asking about what my own actions should be.). Should I be picking and choosing translations like this when I can't figure out a hexagram's application to my own case - or should I stick to the one I first decide to read for that draw, with the risk, sometimes, of bending the situation to match the translation? (this is a wider question than 12.3, I realise).
Of course, it's possible the Yi was simply saying - you're asking a silly question, go with your feeling and retreat