Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
Greetings all :bows:
Just a quick question to run by you, if you`d be so kind.
I had an ugly fall out with a friend some time ago and wondered if now, when things are cooler, there is any difference in the atmosphere.
Is ... thinking/intending of approaching me? hex 37.3,4 <25
My understanding of the reading is that the other side reckons: "No, the dissociation was the right thing to do and I am happy the way things are."
Am I reading this correctly?
Ty :bows:
37. Family Members
Line 3:
Family members scolding, scolding.
disliking harshness brings good fortune.
Woman and child giggling, giggling,
is eventually inadequate.
It's not good to scold each other, it is better to avoid being harsh. But constantly giggling with each other isn't good either, this will not help things to get going. Both inhibit real communication.
Line 4:
Enriching the family.
Much good fortune.
Providing support to each other. Things go very well.
Hexagram is changing to:
25. Without Pretense
Without pretense.
A foundation for progress.
It is beneficial to persist.
In fact, not being pure is a severe mistake.
It is a disadvantage to have a goal to move to.
Being oneself, natural, without making an effort to appear different than one really is. This makes real progress possible. It's beneficial to continue being this way. Not being thus is in fact a severe mistake. Pursuing a goal may make it necessary to go against one's feelings, so this is a disadvantage to being oneself.
I am aware of that and also not fond of yes/no type of questions, but this is such an simple point of a view I tried to apply because for this person answers were always quite consistent to actions.It is best in asking questions of the I Ching to pose them from your own point of view, not ask what someone else is thinking. Sorry, there is no way to read the response you received, because the form of the question is not amenable to interpretation.
37. Family Members
Line 3:
Family members scolding, scolding.
disliking harshness brings good fortune.
Woman and child giggling, giggling,
is eventually inadequate.
It's not good to scold each other, it is better to avoid being harsh. But constantly giggling with each other isn't good either, this will not help things to get going. Both inhibit real communication.
Line 4:
Enriching the family.
Much good fortune.
Providing support to each other. Things go very well.
Hexagram is changing to:
25. Without Pretense
Without pretense.
A foundation for progress.
It is beneficial to persist.
In fact, not being pure is a severe mistake.
It is a disadvantage to have a goal to move to.
Being oneself, natural, without making an effort to appear different than one really is. This makes real progress possible. It's beneficial to continue being this way. Not being thus is in fact a severe mistake. Pursuing a goal may make it necessary to go against one's feelings, so this is a disadvantage to being oneself.
I felt the answer was, according to the translation which I posted above, that although there was a communication problem, there could still be mutual support, but that you must hold to your true feelings.
I had an ugly fall out with a friend some time ago and wondered if now, when things are cooler, there is any difference in the atmosphere.
Is ... thinking/intending of approaching me? hex 37.3,4 <25
I don't see anything wrong with the question Dragona posed.
?
Greetings all :bows:
Just a quick question to run by you, if you`d be so kind.
I had an ugly fall out with a friend some time ago and wondered if now, when things are cooler, there is any difference in the atmosphere.
Is ... thinking/intending of approaching me? hex 37.3,4 <25
My understanding of the reading is that the other side reckons: "No, the dissociation was the right thing to do and I am happy the way things are."
Am I reading this correctly?
Ty :bows:
I guess I felt that he might come back, and reconcile, and that so long as she held to her own feelings, and did not go so far as to be conciliatory, it would be alright. Or at least I had hoped....Hi back, just wondered how (if) you see that happening?
I actually cannot see the vast difference in asking, "How does X feel" or "should I plan for X's return?" , as X would have to feel at least somewhat remorseful to return, so answers the first in any case. I guess the best would be , "What does this quarrel really mean for further relations with X?", but this is so much semantics.yup pointless question. You could toss a coin for it since a its a yes/no question.
Better question might be "should i plan for his return ?" perhaps. At least if you asked that there'd be a clear place to interpret from...ie your POV.
BTW how many threads are there now on his state of mind...is it all the same guy ?
Thank you, and just to add, it is not a family member...but due to the New Moon, my fragile nervous and emotional setup, or the frustration in overall, I am still mostly too dissapointed and quite angry these days and feeling too easily abandoned for I don`t stop caring for people even long after they do.
The question was is the other side ready to approach and from the whole thread here, I think the answer is NO.
I actually cannot see the vast difference in asking, "How does X feel" or "should I plan for X's return?" , as X would have to feel at least somewhat remorseful to return, so answers the first in any case. I guess the best would be , "What does this quarrel really mean for further relations with X?", but this is so much semantics.
While, "What is X thinking, feeling, about me?" may be an unwise question, it is at least honest: They really want to know. When there is a lapse or a silence, this is what fills one's mind.
Sure, I understand the difference. But I suppose philosophically, I am taking the a priori view, such as , What was Ceasar thinking, that he crossed the Rubicon? This is actually what my philosophy mentor taught me, in terms of how to view the etyiology of historical events. So, what is he thinking does not seem like mind-reading to me, but like a priori historical purview thinking.really ? obviously you haven't read the sticky I linked to. You don't understand the difference between trying to understand an answer via mindreading someone else or asking from your own POV... ....well read the sticky. As for wanting to know..yes of course they want to know but they'll never find out by posting 50 threads here about it. Even after 50 threads they don't know.....
don't mind me I'll leave you to get on with it.....
I actually cannot see the vast difference in asking, "How does X feel" or "should I plan for X's return?" , as X would have to feel at least somewhat remorseful to return, so answers the first in any case. I guess the best would be , "What does this quarrel really mean for further relations with X?", but this is so much semantics.
While, "What is X thinking, feeling, about me?" may be an unwise question, it is at least honest: They really want to know. When there is a lapse or a silence, this is what fills one's mind.
Sure, I understand the difference. But I suppose philosophically, I am taking the a priori view, such as , What was Ceasar thinking, that he crossed the Rubicon? This is actually what my philosophy mentor taught me, in terms of how to view the etyiology of historical events. So, what is he thinking does not seem like mind-reading to me, but like a priori historical purview thinking.
I think so, not only from the reading, but from my own experience. Friendships often weather all sorts of conflicts and disruptions. Sorry, sometimes I lose track of these threads. Please post if anything occurs! I have always read H25 as a sort of innocent non-involvement, which could create an opening or space for a return of your friend.Hi back, just wondered how (if) you see that happening?
Good thing I have a sense of humor.yes i can see how all that in depth tutoring got you to your answer here
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).