Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
when one believes something, they want to act on this
Perhaps ideas and desires have parted company from what is possible. Perhaps your concept [of this stuff?] is no longer connected with reality, or inner essence is divorced from its expression
Also when we want to believe something, our brains can dismiss facts that are in front of our eyes. (I'm saying that is the reason that you are having trouble understanding all the casts you did about it) (and it also is a factor in why you didn't share them here as you and we normally do)
I wonder then, is the Yi saying:
'I do not have a clue about ORMUS, so you'll have to figure it out on your own.'
And I am not attacking rosada for doing it, just raising what I feel is a timely, valid question.In Rosada's defense, on several occasions I've been tempted to do this same thing. Haven't ever just because I figured I'd be drawn, quartered, raked over coals... (which no one has done here, bless people)
That might be true, but I think it could also be that the connection gets further muddied by us as well. Sort of muddied multipied.In further defense, what goes through my mind on those occasions is mostly that something is muddying the connection between Yi and me, which wouldn't be a factor if someone else cast ... about the Ormus.
I do not agree. Again I was raising a question, one that I don't think is premature, given the many, varied responses here by our panel of experts ... and rank amatures like myself.Of course you're trying to imagine why Rosada hasn't gotten anywhere with her readings, but I don't know about jumping to that conclusion .... I don't think there's anything Yi doesn't have a clue about.
What I asked was, 'Tell me something truthful and important about ormus that I need to know.'David what question did you ask for 19uc? Also, those of us who are convinced we recognize the call of snake oil when we hear it are going to be pulling 19 apart looking for "no"... e.g. "what it's really saying is Rosada should consult her higher self". Who knows.
No you weren't attacking her, and it is a valid question. My defense was only because what she's done is unusual, & I thought it was worth saying I've thought of doing it too, and what I think has caused me to consider it.And I am not attacking rosada for doing it, just raising what I feel is a timely, valid question.
Could be. I came across a big experiment once in the archives where - more or less, to the extent I remember - a group of members all decided to ask the same question and compare answers. Not sure but I think the general consensus was is was very overwhelming to try to parse that many readings. I think it was a bigger group than in this thread.That might be true, but I think it could also be that the connection gets further muddied by us as well. Sort of muddied multipied.
Of course none of that. Will amend what I said: Yi won't have a clue when there's a good reason for it, i.e. when it's really unknowable. E.g. "who will win the election" when many voters are truly undecided, or "will Uncle Fred leave me his car in his will" when Uncle Fred is nowhere near dying. But I believe anything that's knowable at all is known to Yi. (This could get into a whole tangle about free will...some might say, "Well you only think you haven't decided but you really have and Yi knows it" - I guess I'm assuming we do have some free will.)I also don't believe that that there isn't "anything the Yi doesn't have a clue about.' What if it is not all-knowing, not infallable, not all-seeing? Or what if we don't have the understanding to know what it's saying? Just my opinion of course, and one I hope I don't get 'drawn, quartered, raked over coals' for.
Completely agree with that.if we don't have the understanding
Oh, well that's a good question but not what Rosada wanted (in the first post she suggested a question). What you need to know about something you're not considering using will probably be different from what she needs to know. So it's good you explained.What I asked was, 'Tell me something truthful and important about ormus that I need to know.'
Intuition is a sensed fact,
the problem lies in distinguishing between ones Intuition and their Imagination.
I like that. Does it go with one of the posts or just a general thought?
So, getting back to the the Yi, I wonder if it could be saying that if Ormus really existed, that it might have these wonderful properties?
We are transmitters too.it's as if we are all radio receivers
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).