Can this person be trusted 40.2.3> 45

[steve]

I am not sure about this paticular person, its just a feeling

I asked can this person be trusted 40.2.5 > 45

the lines appear to suggest that no they cannot

does anyone disagree

Steve

 

[steve]

Does anyone agree?

 

[sooo]

I disagree. 40 delivers from the tension this gathering is creating, and line 3 speaks of not carrying the burden of it while in office or leadership position (the carriage), or else it only serves to weaken respect for your position. If something needs to be said or done, then say or do it, if not, then let it go. I don't see the reading saying this person can or can not be trusted. It's more of a compatible utility issue.

 

[steve]

Hi Sooo

thanks for your reply but what about line 2 beileve me I am trying too look objectivley
sorry I may have confused the issue I have 40.2.3 > 45 in the title
I put the correct reading 40.2.5>45 in the Post
do you still say they can be trusted?

Steve

 

[precision grace]

Hi Sooo

thanks for your reply but what about line 2 beileve me I am trying too look objectivley
sorry I may have confused the issue I have 40.2.3 > 45 in the title
I put the correct reading 40.2.5>45 in the Post
do you still say they can be trusted?

Steve

Lise says of 40.2: 9 at 2: At the hunt catching three foxes. Acquiring a gold arrow. Determination auspicious.
Correcting the cunning means aquiring what is pure. Not fleeing nor ignoring the danger, but having the guts and wits to face it. Predators chase the weak and fearful, so look everyone honest in the face, without fear or suspicion.

and 40.5 > 6 at 5: The net-guiding rope of a noble one still leaves freedom. Auspicious. True to small men.
A free mind cannot be bound and does not bind others. But everyone will follow him of his own free will. In order to make others listen to you, honor them for what they are, and give them the freedom to be what they are.
(Changes to hex.47)

 

[sooo]

Hi Sooo

thanks for your reply but what about line 2 beileve me I am trying too look objectivley
sorry I may have confused the issue I have 40.2.3 > 45 in the title
I put the correct reading 40.2.5>45 in the Post
do you still say they can be trusted?

Steve

Hi Steve,

hmm, well, I didn't say he could or couldn't be trusted, but that your position would be compromised unless you either confront him or let it go. Dropping line 3 and picking up line 5, which speaks of delivering yourself from a lesser part of yourself, shows your genuineness and sets an example for this other fellow to follow, so I'd have to stay with the same conclusion. Not saying there is no distrust between you, but that it may be a mutual misunderstanding or misguided impression, or possibly a personality conflict. It's still up to the leader to set the example, and then either decisively act or let it go. I'd just be cautious of accusations based only on suspicion alone. But confronting his specific actions or trying to clear the air of tension between you is well within the meaning of 40.