Iching simple and different readings respects I-ching ?

[piftom]

Hi everybody,

What do you think about the simplified versions of Iching ?
Do you think it respects the book of changes ?

<edit>

It is true that it's easier to understand, but is it real iching readings for you ?

Cheers !

 

[svenrus]

I have followed your link but haven't deepend in it as, when I followed the instruction got number 65. Read that if the ciffer was zero or beyond 64, "Click again". That told me to avoid this specific reading-site because, if You can't master programming what You want to offer You shouldn't had done it at all.

I don't mean that all of those kind of www-sites & programmes should be neglected. If the programmer/webmaster presents himself properly, You should be able to find some 'simplified' readings that work just as well as any respected authors book.... (in this case I couldn't find who made this site You linked).

I think archaelogy bit by bit will unearth I Ching as it was done and practiced milennia ago. That's what I'm lookin forward to: Finding it's roots.....

 

[Tohpol]

Just in case this is yet another way to get spam onto Clarity I've taken the liberty of removing the example from your post. Thanks for your understanding.

 

[Trojina]

thanks...I fell for it and clicked on the drivel...a load of advertising and a pretty useless and infantile version of the IC only anyone who had never used it would even consider. Well it looked so trashy I can't imagine anyone with half a brain would use it. Also the hexagrams were drawn wrongly so hexagram 6 was upside down....

 

[bradford]

garbage in, garbage out

 

[NemeanMagik]

Really appreciating your stuff Bradford. thank you.