Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
If i understand your question correctly, you are asking if a person is still married or now divorced, single anyway. Is that correct?
Therefore if it is correct, then Hex 52.3 > 23 would mean separation, single.(Or at least very, very soon it will be final)
If answering the question directly, I see this as saying, yes, he is steadfastly married, but his heart is suffocating in the relationship. He is in the process stripping away appearances to get to the core of what the relationship is about.
There is some controversy over whether someone is married or not. He doesn't want to confirm it so I asked. What's his current marital status?
52.3 to 23
What do you think? Married or not? Bradford's translation,
Setting those restrictions
Enumerating those distances
Rigors choke the heart
Disunity, feeling awful about it, torn up and a resulting hexagram about splitting. I think the answer is either 'no' or indicative of a breakdown in the marriage.
Because I'm incurably nosey I asked another question, "How is his marriage?"
29, unchanging.
Also asked, (yes, I'm terrible) "What's the problem between them?" 33 to 52.
But I suspect the answers have little or nothing to do with him. I answered as if it did answer your question directly, and who knows for sure, maybe it did. At this point I think it's telling you to be still and retreat from this line of questioning. 29 is great teacher, but usually not without consequences.
That's nice. You're entitled.
I disagree, I think that the IC is answering the questions about this guy and his situation, and in no way is it telling anybody to back off and mind their own business.
Why do you get the impression that he isn't living with her anymore? I don't know whether he is or not. I'll find out eventually of course, but right now I'm just nosey.
His answers are so bad that they just give me the idea that he couldn't put up with the situation any longer and decided to leave town. It seems that his problem is an acute embarrassment to him.
Also, if the IC were to pick and chose how it answered then what would be the point of consulting it.
There is an ethic among some, that holds it to be wrong to use Yi for reasons that are purely selfish, or for reasons that are voyeuristic in nature, or to use it on someone's "behalf" without their consent and knowledge.... Perhaps another side to this is that one consulting with such a purpose might be so out of touch with it's principles as to not be able to read it correctly, and thus become mired in the misunderstanding their own misuse engenders.
Rinda
His answers are so bad that they just give me the idea that he couldn't put up with the situation any longer and decided to leave town. It seems that his problem is an acute embarrassment to him.
Also, if the IC were to pick and chose how it answered then what would be the point of consulting it.
. Perhaps another side to this is that one consulting with such a purpose might be so out of touch with it's principles as to not be able to read it correctly, and thus become mired in the misunderstanding their own misuse engenders.
Rinda
Well, it has always worked for me. I haven't always understood the answer at the time I received it, but later I saw that it was indeed a very direct answer to the question asked. The IC wasn't scolding me or anything of that nature.
After Esolo's first inquiry, I felt that Yi had shifted, directing answers not to the mystery man but to Esolo. But realistically, that could have only been my own impatience and disapproval.
I'm frequently asked not only to interpret a reading for someone, but to throw the coins on their behalf, as well, and the outcomes are always quite clear to both of us. But then again, I am doing so with their consent.
A short while ago, a close friend was going through a dangerous physical trauma. It was important to me to understand what state of mind this person was in, and so I asked the Yi, and Yi's answer was helpful, because I knew better how I could best help them get through it. So again, it appears that intent was a factor, in spite of my personal distaste for that consideration.
I once argued with Ewald over this matter of intent. I concede, I think he was right and I was wrong. People's intentions aren't always as innocent as I'd like to imagine.
While that was interesting the fact remains that the answers did indeed reflect the situaion, perfectly. Willowfox was also right on target when she spoke of embarrassment. Since I myself didn't see that aspect of it reflected in the answer I'm curious about why she said that.
The embarrassment aspect could be described as WF's intuitive faculty which I think is pretty developed.
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).