how do you consider a reading with the first and the last lines moving ?

[patro]

hello all,

i want to know from you all, how you normally consider a reading where only the first and sixth line changes at once.

normally the advice is to not take them in consideration cause they are how a situation begins and how it ends or instincts and wisdom.
both are lines from wich one get rarely an advice... but it's just a simple explanations about acting.
or at last to look at them with a minimal importance.

well, let me know and share your thought about.

 

[Trojina]

hello all,

i want to know from you all, how you normally consider a reading where only the first and sixth line changes at once.

normally the advice is to not take them in consideration cause they are how a situation begins and how it ends. both are lines from wich one get rarely an advice... but it's just a simple explanations about acting.
or at last to look at them with a minimal importance.

well, let me know and share your thought about.

To save repetition I managed to find this thread where Tiziano gives his thoughts about this, enthusiastically met by mine, here it is http://www.onlineclarity.co.uk/friends/showthread.php?t=11784

I really got alot from Tizianos posts, maybe one day he will come back. Anyway his thoughts and some of mine on lines 1 and 6 moving are in that thread.

 

[patro]

I know Tiziano very well, we write on the same italian site

btw... i'm looking for a kind of general rules.
for example 2-> 27 both lines are bad... but the evolving hex is 27, a good one!
so it's a bit hard to get the meaning.....

 

[Trojina]

I think they are quite general rules we are discussing in that thread.

Yes personally I'd see that 2>27 reading differently than just looking at lines one and six seperately...but I never think theres any hard rules

Not sure how I would see 2>27 though but I wouldn't be focusing on lines 1 and 6 being 'bad', the 27 has to be pretty central to the reading IMO

 

[patro]

I think they are quite general rules we are discussing in that thread.

Yes personally I'd see that 2>27 reading differently than just looking at lines one and six seperately...but I never think theres any hard rules

Not sure how I would see 2>27 though but I wouldn't be focusing on lines 1 and 6 being 'bad' the 27 has to pretty central to the reading IMO

sure but 2-> 27 is like special case.... a test situation.

i would skip the readings of both lines... and to look only on the general meaning of both hexagrams.

the tecnique explained by Tiziano in that thread is one that i often use. i have contact too to the Italian expert... we talked about more than once about. it works really nice