...life can be translucent

Menu

Meeting the Yi lord (from the blog)

hilary

Administrator
Joined
Apr 8, 1970
Messages
19,253
Reaction score
3,500
Each year on my birthday, I ask Yi for guidance for the coming year. Then over the course of the year I revisit the reading, finding guidance and gleaning understanding as I go.
At least, such is the theory. Last year’s reading, cast on 7th December 2015, was Hexagram 55, Abundance, changing at line 4 to 36, Brightness Hiding.

I could recognise the 55 moment, the imperative to take responsibility, do the abundance of things to be done (like redesigning the website) with the abundance of energy and motivation available to do them. And I could recognise 36 as my general tendency to want to stay safe by staying invisible. (Not the most helpful tendency to have in my line of work.) But the moving line…?

‘Feng is screened off
At midday, seeing the Dipper.
Meeting your hidden lord,
Good fortune.’

So here is Wu of Zhou, the new leader, finding his city shrouded in darkness, not quite able to see where he is, but with guidance still clearly visible. (Yes.) And then he meets a hidden lord, a ‘Yi lord’. The Yi people were not normally allies of the Zhou, on the contrary, but Wu made common cause with them against the Shang. So I generally read this line to mean seeking and finding an ally where you wouldn’t normally do so.

“Because of the importance of what you have to do, you will meet what you fear – and because you can see your direction so clearly, you can bring even the hidden lord into alliance with your greater purpose,” says my book (rather ponderously).

“Meet your enemy! He might be the one you need. Sometimes the very things which hold us back contain the energy which can help us to gather the strength to go on,” says LiSe, conveying more in fewer words.

So I understood all about hidden lords in theory, but who was mine? All through the year, I couldn’t seem to spot one. I got more help from a web developer than I might otherwise have done, yes, and I listened to advisers whose perspective is different from mine… but really, I didn’t meet anyone very dark or mysterious. I revisited the reading periodically without being any the wiser, and started to wonder if this might be one of Yi’s giant jokes: that the hidden lord was so well-hidden you’d never know whether or not you’d met him.

With about three days to go before my birthday, I sat down and asked myself again – who is this Yi lord?

And – as usually happens when I’m prepared to sit and get into dialogue with a reading – I had a moment of recognition, remembering a couple of encounters that I realised were with the Yi lord.
There was a conversation that looked like it must surely become an argument: we were clashing over deep convictions, and when that happens my default setting is to respond in self-defence, as if my very self were under attack. But my interlocutor paused to say, ‘I don’t want to argue’ – and that brought me up short.

And I’d been reading Facebook posts from someone saying she had voted for Trump, and sincerely inviting civil discussion to build understanding. To be clear – I found her invitation disingenuous, and I think standing against what Trump represents is wholly necessary. But that’s also not the same thing as having a row on Facebook, and the parallel, the not-arguing, was striking.

In each case I found myself thinking – if this isn’t an argument, what is it? If I’m not on the defensive here, what am I doing? And I realised that my next impulse was to ask how can I help? And especially, how can I help this person to inhabit the real world?

Of course, the Trump voter would no doubt claim to have voted in the ‘real world’: one where we are under threat, and human compassion might be all very nice in theory, but we can’t really afford to extend it to those people who are not like us, and hence scary and not quite real. But that is a fairy story – a construct – a bubble. Not real.

Scratch the surface a bit, and I can find my own inner Yi lord, living in her own little fantasy bubble of fear and threat. The more visible I become, the more she has to say – in fact, she’s been vetoing this post for a couple of weeks now:

“You can’t post this,” she explains, reasonably, “because people won’t accept it – or you. Sharing openly might be all very nice in theory, but you can’t really afford to do it, it isn’t safe, because Those People” (she never quite explains who They are, but she knows all about Them) “don’t believe you’re real, and they’ll hurt you.”
It takes more effort, but I can also at least entertain the idea that this bubble-world might not be real, either.

The deep underlying reality and the stuff the cosmos is made of is connection, meaning, compassion. How do I know? Because readings work. Reality acknowledges, responds and talks to people; I help by making that reality a bit more obvious.

So what can I learn – a bit late – from 55.4 to 36?

I’m familiar with 36, Brightness Hiding, as relating hexagram. In that position I find it mostly has to do with believing that you’re in danger and need to hide your light. The belief can be based on experience, and it may be true now, or it may not. It’s also possible that the light hidden under the earth is being kept safe, like the spark of a fire banked up overnight.

The Yi lord is a dark figure who, oddly enough, somehow manages both to inspire such beliefs and also represent them: he (or she) is a threat, and also believes in a world of threat. And so this is stronger than just, ‘Someone you wouldn’t normally consider as an ally’: it’s someone opposed to all I stand for. But what if I’m at Feng, at the heart of my calling and work, and the Yi lord shows up saying, ‘I don’t want to argue’ and ‘Let’s talk’? If I’m not fighting this darkness, not defending against it – if I’m somehow meant to be making an ally of it, of all things – and I cannot begin to describe how bizarre and unnatural that seems to me – then what on earth is that going to look like?

This is still a mystery to me, but I think it has something to do with the Yi lord’s power to clarify a calling and galvanise action. The changing line’s in the fourth place: first steps in the outer world, asking, ‘What can I do?’ Also, it’s the first line of thunder, the trigram of initiative and setting things in motion. The energy of Yi is added to that of Zhou. (Which is exactly what LiSe’s commentary said…)

I also found, in the moment, that having ‘How can I fight off this threat?’ taken out of the picture left a lot of space for ‘How can I help?’ – for compassion and a desire to share.
A couple of days later, I cast my reading for this year, and received 61.2.4.5 to 21.
 
Last edited:

Liselle

Supporter
Clarity Supporter
Joined
Sep 20, 1970
Messages
13,026
Reaction score
2,451
Please don't feel squeamish about posting things! Even if some don't entirely "agree" with you, what you write is always thoughtful, interesting, and Yi-based, and we can still learn I Ching things and ask I Ching questions.

To wit:

  • You said you recognized 55 right away as the site redesign. Do you still, after identifying the "Yi lord" as you eventually did? In other words, do you think this reading is addressing two completely different subjects at once? It's something I've seen people (myself included) say is probably "possible," but this would be a rather dramatic example of it, since the two subjects could hardly be more un-alike.

  • After you figured out what the Yi lord was, did you ask Yi about it, to confirm? Is that something you ever do, or would recommend for or against?
 

hilary

Administrator
Joined
Apr 8, 1970
Messages
19,253
Reaction score
3,500
Please don't feel squeamish about posting things! Even if some don't entirely "agree" with you, what you write is always thoughtful, interesting, and Yi-based, and we can still learn I Ching things and ask I Ching questions.
Thank you. The trouble with posting Yi things is that as soon as they get beyond the theoretical, they turn very very personal. (As everyone who ever posted a reading on this forum has found out already, I suppose...)

You said you recognized 55 right away as the site redesign. Do you still, after identifying the "Yi lord" as you eventually did? In other words, do you think this reading is addressing two completely different subjects at once? It's something I've seen people (myself included) say is probably "possible," but this would be a rather dramatic example of it, since the two subjects could hardly be more un-alike.
Good question - what effect does recognising the line have on my idea of the hexagram? Well... 55 wasn't specifically the redesign for me to start with, it was just a broad imperative: take charge, be decisive, do the work you're called to do, don't faff about, get things done. 'Things' included the redesign, as that had been overdue for years. So my idea of it didn't really change: I think it's still 'do the work you're called to do' plus '...and here is what helps to galvanise you into action, and it's not what you think.'
After you figured out what the Yi lord was, did you ask Yi about it, to confirm? Is that something you ever do, or would recommend for or against?
I didn't, but I didn't need to, as I had a couple of 36 readings about specific Yi-lord-ish people and situations immediately afterwards - even one with 36.4, pointing straight back to 55.4. And also because the moment of recognition was very clear. When the penny really drops, it can't be mistaken for anything else.

But yes, when I'm not sure whether I've recognised something or not, I have been known to ask, 'How about reading this as x?' Normally this would be when reading for someone else, so that 'recognition' isn't usually available in the same way and I might need to double-check. Then the question is more like, 'If I read this as x, what will I be giving this querent?'
 
M

mirian

Guest
Maybe this will add to what Hilary said about Hex 55.4 >> 36 and her own reading.

I had Hex 55 line 4 after breaking my wrist, about 4 years ago. I asked the Yi because my recovery was not going so well, basically the A&E team didn't do a great job when they set a cast on my arm at the hospital.

Over a month after the accident I was referred to a surgeon. He was the lord in line 4. During the consultation the surgeon told me that he wanted to set an immediate date for surgery, in which I would have metal pins put in my wrist. I questioned the need for doing so, he explained the medical grounds. I declined to agree with the surgery.

The point of the story is: the lord and I were on opposite sides, there was no argument, just a civilised conversation between doctor and patient. But there couldn't be a compromise, it was yes or no to a surgery.

I learned from the lord, listening to him helped me to make a decision. He might have learned something from me, maybe how patients can be very sceptical and opinionated!

So there was fear, exchange and learning, but the lord and I maintained our initial positions.

By way, the wrist recovered after having a new cast set and I haven't had the metal pins.
 

Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom

Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).

Top