Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
But this doesn't make sense. You have asked a political question so you have to understand the politics to some extent surely, you can't go on with the reading without knowing about the situation. Also if you aren't involved with the politics why would you ask the question?Two things I've never been clever at is politic and economy. So I would prefer to stay out of such discussions.
Yes, it's complicated. And if it declared itself Neutral? Or, is it already?
In real terms, in the real world ,in the real political situation, how do you see that suggestion applying? Putin gets counselling or something?I see this as saying the solution lies in less posturing and instead engage with more empathic connection.
It is not the role I have taken on here to give an opinion on how to apply the reading. My role is purely that of an interpreter. Offering insight based in my conversation with Yi.In real terms, in the real world ,in the real political situation, how do you see that suggestion applying? Putin gets counselling or something?
I am answering the question posed as I see it within 50:2.3 <> 35. The question posed was a very loose affair so I would say that the interpretation I see in the consultation is one solution. I'll leave it to others to express the practicalities of this possible solution or to see alternative solutions in the response surnevs obtained from Yi.So you aren't referring to the real political solution to avoidance of war but just that everybody be a bit nicer. That's not a solution is it it's just a sentiment made from a great distance.
Huang says that 50 originally denoted an ancient Chinese sacrificial vessel that held food for the ancestors in temple based rituals. With 50 following on from 49, which denotes all sorts of ways of making way for the new and 49 being especially powered when these ways are based on removing silt gathered over a long time at the bottom of the well (48), there does look to long arms reaching back into abolishing the aspects of past which no longer hold meaning.my_key, your interpretation seems good to me. Maybe I was caught in A. Huang's notice [hex. 50] on the history concerning the cauldron and its traditional use a bit too much.
An interpreter applies the reading to the situation. You spoke as if it were just a question of behaving a bit better whereas this is a complex political situation.It is not the role I have taken on here to give an opinion on how to apply the reading. My role is purely that of an interpreter. Offering insight based in my conversation with Yi.
Actually I find it too serious a matter to merely find it 'interesting'. People's lives are at risk, it's a very sad situation.Who knows? It'll be interesting to see what does transpire and how accurate this interpretation or that offered by others is.
There is no such thing as a 'neutral I Ching interpretation'. You don't give neutral interpretations any more than anyone does it just likely feels that you do. We all feel we do as we don't notice our own bias. You placed your own values onto the cast with disapproval of 'posturing' and the belief that all issues can be resolved by a touch of 'empathy' or on a psychological level.
The very idea of doing a 'neutral' reading with this political issue or any other really is quite unrealistic. If one has watched the news one will have an opinion of some sort even if one doesn't know it.
An interpreter applies the reading to the situation. You spoke as if it were just a question of behaving a bit better whereas this is a complex political situation.
Actually I find it too serious a matter to merely find it 'interesting'. People's lives are at risk, it's a very sad situation.
I see this as saying the solution lies in less posturing and instead engage with more empathic connection.
...but I wasn't meaning to make a complaint of it. Sorry if it came over that way.I see this as saying the solution lies in less posturing and instead engage with more empathic connection.
I'm not great at the politics nor the history but my father lived in exile in the UK most of his life being unable to return to his own country, the Ukraine, never to see his family or his home again, because he had fought the Russians. He died a few years before Ukraine gained independence. So I have a feel of it because I was surrounded by the sense of what it means to be denied your home land. Now they are threatened again. I guess I felt it would take more than a bit of empathy to help things that's all.Like you, I hold no real political insights on this situation.
It did carry that charge for me......It's okay Mykey I'm not expecting you to explain any further, you are answering Sernevs not me after all, it's just given the scale and the seriousness of the issue this seemed, well quite a disconnect to me
...but I wasn't meaning to make a complaint of it. Sorry if it came over that way.
.... however having read this I can empathise with how the current conflict is touching you on deeper ancestral levels. Levels held within your family history, That sense you hold of being 'denied your homeland' runs deep. It is no wonder that the current echoes are bringing that closer to the surface for you.I'm not great at the politics nor the history but my father lived in exile in the UK most of his life being unable to return to his own country, the Ukraine, never to see his family or his home again, because he had fought the Russians. He died a few years before Ukraine gained independence. So I have a feel of it because I was surrounded by the sense of what it means to be denied your home land. Now they are threatened again. I guess I felt it would take more than a bit of empathy to help things that's all.
Oh, I didn't mean anything like u enjoying it... I just pointed out to the query developments. Maybe I used a wrong English expression ("how do you like it"). I meant smthing like "do the developments about yr query have been clarified". That's what I meant.isacosmo, if You refers to the one who started this thread if he feels comfortable sitting at a good distance from the conflict, I may say that I don't feel good at it. The leaders who must find a solution hopefully will yet to me they seem to be a bit bewildered which I understand, the complexity of the situation in mind. If they can't it's bad. Could it be that the I Ching could?
Yes, 'how do you like it' was puzzling there. It could have been taken as 'how would you like it!' which is like saying 'you wouldn't like this if it happened to you!' or it could be simply saying 'how do you like it' as in 'is this to your taste?' . I guess you were asking Sernevs what he felt about his replies so far.Oh, I didn't mean anything like u enjoying it... I just pointed out to the query developments. Maybe I used a wrong English expression ("how do you like it"). I meant smthing like "do the developments about yr query have been clarified". That's what I meant.
Incidently, today the Donbass evacuation has started
I didn't know what an 'Atlanticist' wasOne thing tho: the only ones who are enjoying this tension are the warlords (aka Atlanticists) and their minions. The rest of us are just worried and revolted with this "cum false flag"
Atlanticism, also known as Transatlanticism,[1] is the belief in or support for a close relationship between peoples and governments in Northern America (United States, Canada) and those in Europe (European Union, United Kingdom, Switzerland, Norway), regarding political, economic, and defence issues. It seeks to maintain the security and prosperity of the participating countries and protect liberal democracy and the values that unite them. The term derives from the Atlantic Ocean that separates Northern America from Europe.
I disagree there even can be I Ching readings completely disassociated from actual politics and the views of the querent. I will start a separate thread with my views on that in Open Space later on perhaps so as not to derail this one.Whatever the solution is, the interpretation of the I Ching reading is the primary here and the subject (in this case a conflict) is secondary. Had my question been raised in a political forum, of course then the actual conflict had got the primary place. I don't think any of us are "cold" to the actual conflict but the main subject is the I Ching.
Yes, it is very easy to get a different flavour from the titles that are chosen for a hexagram. Huang's title, Eliminating resonated for me on this occasion as he champions that held within the hexagram is a charge to 'take resolute actions to eliminate negative forces'. This perspective is not a million miles away from your preferred tag of Resolving.My_key, on #5 "..... the deep challenge for any solution comes from the nuclear Hex 43 (Eliminating) from where the calling comes to remain strong ....." it stroked me, with the different translations of the hexagram Tag's that in Zhu Xi's commentaries to the I Ching * , the Tag is Resolving, which got a different take to the situation / gives it a different light. I know that this is a discussion on it's own ie which translation fit's the true meaning of those hexagram names or ancient chinese Ideograph's. Just that the tag Resolving resonated the initial question: "Solution ?"
But: just a notice
-----
*) The original meaning of the Yijing, Zhu Xi, tr. Joseph Adler, Columbia University Press, N.Y. 2020
For me you make the divination and a meaning / answer comes to you. Whether you use traditional ways of interpreting or the meaning just jumps out at you from an image, or the history of the ideograph or you use the sequence, or you use the pair, or you just work with the trigrams. It matters not. All roads lead to Rome: a reading that makes some meaning for you.My interpretation wasn't, as their interpretations, quite in accordance with how a reading shall be interpreted. I Ching showed me a cauldron and I looked at the Ideograph and read the history of it and from there drawing my conclusions which, I won't deny, was sort of coloured by my own point of view.
Yes, it is very easy to get a different flavour from the titles that are chosen for a hexagram. Huang's title, Eliminating resonated for me on this occasion as he champions that held within the hexagram is a charge to 'take resolute actions to eliminate negative forces'. This perspective is not a million miles away from your preferred tag of Resolving.
I do not have access to Adler's translation but would hope at some point in the future I can see more of his hexagram titles.
Good Luck
Surnevs I delved into the matter more and I now understand what you meant. I was lacking some knowledge of past events.the solution would neither be to seek a new alliance, the old being with the USSR, Eastward nor Westward but to establish itself as an independent, neutral state.
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).