Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
It doesn't seem like that to me at all. 40 provides for a resolution in your favor, as does 16, if there are compromises made. Where the legal action is taking place is important, as procedures and rules differ from place to place. That a judge may seem unprepared doesn't mean that he is not so or in some way incapable of trying a case. Do no rely on hearsay about these matters.
Come on people, help...
1. What atitude should take toward this preliminary judge; 13.1.2.3.6>47
2. How can I achieve that DA continue the procecution; 28.3.4>29
Am I wrong or 29 is not a good omen...
What do you have to do with this trial? Are you a victim? An aggrieved party? What kind of action is this and where?
Did judge made damage to my subject? Answer 40.2>16
HEXAGRAM 40 IS ABOUT escape and freedom. Following the line of least resistance and getting out of danger. There is foregiveness.
LINE 2 says 3 foxes were bagged. It could mean the judge is an old fox. Foxes can refer to actual people who are sneaky smart and conniving (study characterisitics of foxes when they come in for the kill) or hidden negative forces in the case - incriminating evidence? You need to eliminate or uncover these 3 negative elements/foxes to be richly rewarded and you will.
HEXAGRAM 16 means the judge appointed helpers to make his/her move. Timing is important. The month of March (Blofeld)
Both hexagrams demand compromise because both are harmful to both parties. However, I think that this approach seems wrong to me. There are two alternative paths at work: First, there is the problem of you being a victim of something the defendant has done and you want compensation for that. However, it is also now a matter of the courts. The two paths are distinct and cannot be resolved easily in any country. If there a crime has truly been done, even if you work out an agreement with the defendant, the government is obligated to follow through on the crime no matter what, unless the compensation somehow makes a good compromise for the government to overlook the crime. At the same time, if the government cannot show a crime, it may be very difficult for you to get the money you want. My sense is that your entire approach to this matter has been detrimental to you, but not so bad for the defendant. I fear that any compromise you make with him will only hurt you. It appears to me that the most important thing you can do is to have the government do its job correctly and that puts a greater onus on the defendant to make due on the action. So, I think that what is necessary for you is not to make a compromise with the defendant, but one with the government where the government gets the rid of the case to go on to more important matters in exchange for the defendant making you whole again. Work with the government, not the defendant, and you will probably succeed.
Did judge made damage to my subject? Answer 40.2>16
HEXAGRAM 40 IS ABOUT escape and freedom. Following the line of least resistance and getting out of danger. There is foregiveness.
LINE 2 says 3 foxes were bagged. It could mean the judge is an old fox. Foxes can refer to actual people who are sneaky smart and conniving (study characterisitics of foxes when they come in for the kill) or hidden negative forces in the case - incriminating evidence? You need to eliminate or uncover these 3 negative elements/foxes to be richly rewarded and you will.
HEXAGRAM 16 means the judge appointed helpers to make his/her move. Timing is important. The month of March (Blofeld)
Dear Yamabushi I try not to read everyone's post including your own only the question you ask so as not to be infliuenced by other factors. I just write what the hexagrams mean and let you figure out the rest. I'm not a pro on this
59.4.5>64? What is the question?
Hexagram 59 means a situation that is dissolving so it's important that you stay focused on your original intentions. Stay centered in unsettling times. Don't scatter your energy. Ride the wave without getting wiped out. you need to keep your balance.
Line 4 Events sweep you out of the way of danger to high ground
Line 5 Dripping with sweat and nervous you are summoned to the judge's office, home, court? (the king's palace) Take the offer only if you can keep a cool head,
Hexagram 64
It's not over yet. There is still some unfinished business left. There is no complete closure. Still another obstacles to pass. Success is not assured yet.
Ask:
Did the defendant somehow influence on the judge?
It reads to me like in the first post you are actually saying the judge is in league with the criminal, that the judge is untrustworthy......which is what i thought Yamabushi was questioning you about. S/hes asking you what you meant. I wondered if thats what you actually meant too.
BTW are you directly quoting your interpretations from a book or other source ? Or maybe you are summarising Blofelds commentaries or someone elses ? Just wondered
Did judge made damage to my subject? Answer 40.2>16
HEXAGRAM 40 IS ABOUT escape and freedom. Following the line of least resistance and getting out of danger. There is foregiveness.
LINE 2 says 3 foxes were bagged. It could mean the judge is an old fox. Foxes can refer to actual people who are sneaky smart and conniving (study characterisitics of foxes when they come in for the kill) or hidden negative forces in the case - incriminating evidence? You need to eliminate or uncover these 3 negative elements/foxes to be richly rewarded and you will.
HEXAGRAM 16 means the judge appointed helpers to make his/her move. Timing is important. The month of March (Blofeld)
Hi Trojan to answer your curiosity. It's my deductions from my expert experience and research of the I Ching (10 years). Some interpretations are also from Blofeld. What made you think the judge would be cooperating with the criminal and the appointed helpers not be the jury? The logical assumption IMO the appointed helpers could be the jury who play an important part in the decision process in any court. In Europe For example there are 3 judges present on the panel when there is no jury. There is no illegal activity going on here. I don't know what the case is about. The foxes could be the other side. Cheers!
How can I make compromise with defendant to compensate damage he done? Answer; 59. 4.5>64
Thank you for your pm, Yama.
The text of 64 says: "The Superior Man takes care to distinguish between things before arranging them in order." You were wondering if some middle ground could be found if you made some sort of arrangement with the defendant. The answer is: No.
I agree with everybody who told you to leave things to the legal authorities. And remember to look at the female judge as a judge, not as a woman, when you go to court.
My opinion is the same as those before me in this thread. The ridgepole of the sagging situation will be braced. 28.3 implies something painful or difficult, but 28.4 will fix that. That will be a good outcome...
...provided that you don't reach for too much. Only reach for what will adequately relieve the weight or burden you are carrying; no more than that.
Let go of thoughts that everybody you see is not competent or not prepared, or not this and not that. It's their usual job to decide these legal cases. It is my opinion that you should sit back as much as possible -- and let them do their usual job.
The atmosphere of a courtroom is of utmost restraint. You have a critical nature and will need to keep yourself still and never get emotional. These are good readings, Yamabushi.
Do less -- relax -- and you will succeed more.
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).