Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
With hexagram 44, the assumption seems to be that the woman is too powerful or, as someone said in another thread, she's a bitch.
Yes, I guess it would bring misfortune to give power to an evil person. However, I know that some of the people who have come up when I have gotten this hexagram are not evil people. Unless, of course, I myself, the querent, am the evil person, in which case I guess this thread can end right here.
So I would like to ask if it has ever come up in your study of the I Ching that a male person was the infiltrating influence that needed to be guarded against? Or do you see the negative influence always as a seductive female? Has there always been an infiltrating influence to be guarded against?
The Concordance says: "woman and what is inherently female." Can it ever happen that a male person is "inherently female"? Sometimes young boys, for example, are categorized with females in the I Ching.
Is it the operation of this hexagram that someone inferior -- the female -- appears to be somewhat pink and fuzzy, but she's really terrifically evil, and no foothold at all should be afforded to someone like her? A wolf in sheep's clothing? In other words, she will subjugate you. "Subjugated" was the title used in the Greg Whincup translation for hexagram 44.
Regarding the one going to meet or coming to the encounter, can that person be either a male or a female? It would be great to hear from a male person if he has ever gotten this hexagram and what the circumstances were. Was he going on a job interview, for example?
The Concordance calls this hexagram "Coupling," and says it is characterized by powerful instinctive forces and magnetic attraction. Well, this sounds like illicit sexual attraction and going to meet a prostitute or seeking a loose woman in the streets. No wonder everybody's blood pressure rises a few points when they get hexagram 44.
I always have to compare what is written in the various translations with my own experience using the Yi. I once got hex 44 when I asked about visiting my kid sister. I also got hex 44 when I asked about visiting my brother. Another time I got hex 44 was when I asked about visiting a woman who had been my former employer. She is a Tibetan Buddhist of very detached and scholarly demeanor, a retired professional woman.
Magnetic attractions are not always sexual attractions. I'm not a physicist and I don't know what the actual definition of magnetic attraction is. But I do know that I was never sexually attracted to my own sister; nor did I ever "couple" with her. She's my blood relative, though. Same thing with my brother. We are on the same wavelength.
Regarding the woman I used to work for, it was an entirely synchronistic relationship. We were always attuned to each other, even at a distance, maybe the way those atomic clocks are always set to Greenwich Mean Time -- not that I know the mechanics of how they work, either. It was a boring but continuously harmonious relationship. "Woman's vigor,"says the Concordance, "the ideogram: strength and scholar, intellectual impact." Yes, that was the way she was, a cultivated, scholarly woman. She was not pushy, impulsive, or bitchy at all.
What I'm thinking is this: When people get hexagram 44, instead of going to meet, do they feel dread and become afraid to go -- because of hex 44's bad reputation. And hex 44 has to be executed in a timely fashion, so if they don't go, then they are missing the boat.
That was why when Mazaru asked, in a thread under Shared Readings on 1/18, if she should go on her job interview, I said, "Yes, go." She had gotten hex 44, with no moving lines, which I understood to be auspicious, a new beginning for her.
And so far, so good. Mazaru did well on her interview. They like her there and everything's looking great for the future of her job. I felt I did a good day's work yesterday because of that one thing.
If you got hexagram 44, would you go? Or would you stay home? :bows:
the quote button is on the bottom right of the threads, if you wish to quote , go below the post and click the quote button
Hi Trojina:So Charly you are assuming F U C K ! was used as an expletive in ancient China in exactly the same sense as we use it now ? I think it a bit of a stretch to be honest though not knowing Chinese I can't be sure. Language changes significantly even within a 100 years..thats even within one language, and you're saying even with a different language and the vast stretch of time passed the ancient Chinese said "F U C K ! its hot" or "F U C K ! its a powerful girl"...in the way we do... it doesn't seem likley to me Charly, we didn't even say that a few hundred years ago...used other words.
I often wonder how you tie your linguistic analysis in with your actual readings...your experience of 44 in your life
狗 GOU3 dog, damned; cursed (1)
(Talk about misogynistic, the Mawangdui text titles the hexagram Gou, The Bitch, both as female dog and a term of contempt. "Not at all useful to court the bitch." Bradford)
Source: https://www.yijing.nl/i_ching/origins/unearthed/mawangdui/mawangdui.htm
狗日 gou3 ri4: lit. f_cked or spawned by a dog / contemptible / F_UCKING
Source MDBG: https://www.mdbg.net/chinese/dictionary?page=worddict&wdrst=1&wdqb=狗日
肏 cao4, copulate, expletive (F_CK!)Source: MDBG
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).