Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
There is a Sufi story about how the Yi Jing lost its voice with the diviners just opening it at random whilst eating, dripping gravy on to it. Dies does sound interesting, I have tried them before with the Kuan Yin oracle, but never for the Yi Jing which sounds more involved. I am thinking that practicing staring at a candle for six minutes a day might help. I will have to try it.I can't give You an answer just share my experience. I turned over to dies years ago and like with coins it takes no time but to my surprise I now and then, seldom found myself with the sticks of yarrow when the inquiry were special important. So I guess one will find forth the sticks of yarrow when the situation calls for it.....
Thank you for your answer D, the video is worth watching, but not necessarily worth following. Yarrow stick divination has advantages over the coins method for several reasons. One it is slower allowing for a greater meditative approach, and two it has an element of conscious approximation allowing for some use of the ego. I really see it as the best approach in certain circumstances, but suffer from too much ADHD to be able to practice it. This is the root of my question. I do find it interesting that the coin method predates it. That I didn't know. Thank you.I assume you are talking about how you might prepare yourself, or 'get into the mood' or gain a correct frame of mind to use the yarrow stalks for divination.
If that's the case, then I'd say keep it simple, whatever works for you is what is 'correct'. Do note however, some Yi authors don't think that getting into a quite place or frame of mind is necessary for using the Yi. See the YouTube video link below, which opens with someone demonstrating the 'proper use' of yarrow stalks. Rules 1 and 2 in the video speak to your question, though the whole video is very good in my opinion.
Also, what's this about a Sufi tale of people using the Yi? That seems to be mixing up times, places, cultures, and traditions quite a lot. Therefore, I'd be interested to know the source of this tale - since the Yi predates Islam and Sufism by maybe 1,500 years.
Regards, D
The coin-method do not predate the Yarrow-method. It's just that the manual we have today to the use of it are reconstructed................................ I do find it interesting that the coin method predates it. That I didn't know. Thank you.
I think what is true is that the Yi didn't come with a set of instructions, so we don't know exactly how it was originally used. There are some people who think, for example, that early on a second, resulting, hexagram wasn't constructed, nor consulted. It's also interesting to me that both coin and stalk methods are skewed towards getting more unmoving lines: with these methods we have a 25% probability of getting a moving line, where with a random number generator, it's more like 50%!
I think the probabilities that are built into the yarrow and coin method are intentional, and were meant to give us more unmoving lines, and therefore generally fewer moving lines as part of our queries. But that's just speculation on my part.
As far as that parts of Asia goes, there are many detailed studies. If I remember correctly, for QMDJ for example(another system used for divination in there), there were schools that mapped out hundreds of cases with both popular approaches there, with the idea they can finally prove with absolute clarity that one is more accurate. And that is challenging with QMDJ, as you can't use a map more often then once every 2 hours, so if you want a hundred cases, you will need minimum of 200 hours., I think we now have more, and more varied systems, but not necessarily 'better' or more correct ones!
Getting back to the original question, someone asked about how to get into the correct 'mood' for using yarrow stalks, and I suggested that there is no 'correct mood' only whatever works for him. He seems to be saying that he still prefers a more 'meditative' approach ... so be it.
You often refer to these 'systems', which most of here are not familiar with, and even fewer of us use. So, as I said earlier, I don't see the point of what you're getting at here, or how it's addressing the original question?
As for me, I'm completely fine using the casting methods I use, and I not seeking anything more 'perfect' or more 'accurate', regardless of how many studies have been done about it. Studies, just like casting methods, or Asian, or Confusian interpretations of the Yi can all be biased and skewed.
And I strongly suspect that many of these methods and interpretations might be based more on currying favor of whomever was in power at the time, and less on a correct or more perfect interpretation of the Dao.
And as with politics and religion, and the Yi and the Dao, large numbers don't equate to correctness. If so, we should all convert to Christianity and choose to live under toletarian regimes and dictators.
D
I don't remember commenting on what system was more accurate ....
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).