Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
Now, I do feel that it is entirely invasive to ask about someone that is oblivious to being asked about.
I've noticed (and received) advice that it really isn't prudent to ask about other people.
Hi, I have considered this matter a lot, too.
When I ask, "What are the motives of X regarding Y?" , I am really asking for my own INTELLIGENCE and INTUITION to be cleared of illusions, so that I can judge and perceive clearly.
I believe the Yi answers in such a way as to allow me to gain access to deeper levels of my own understanding, by dissolving the blocks thereto.
Yet, there's a difference between that kind of question -- which arises frequently in the iching consultations -- and a kind of manipulation or "spying" kind of question, in which we delude ourselves into believing we can get secret knowledge of another person's private life.
Consider it, if you have something in your heart, which is private, and which you do not divulge to others, would you want another person to be able to learn of these deeply buried areas of private concern through the Yi?
The Yi is based on certain ethical principles, I believe, and to try to manipulate or distort these principles for our own private reasons -- (as in "spying" on the inner lives of others) -- will only backfire.
I could articulate this point more clearly , perhaps -- but I hope you get what I mean.
I believe that you can ask about anything, there are no rules and limits in conversation with Yi. Explore it, use it as you wish, in a spirit of 4.5 → 59 (Dispersing), Richmond: Immature experience brings advantage.
And I agree with others, you probably won't gain much from these answers about others, it can be hard to decrypt. So it would be more useful to ask about your attitude and best approach to situations.
On a spiritual level - there are no others, we are really like leafs on a tree, and there are really no secrets.
I hope that someday we will evolve to a state (which is depicted in D.Cannon's books, regressive hypnosis)
where all people have mind reading ability and telepathy and lying is simply impossible. And you know what - it leads to a real h11, social equality, harmony and prosperity.
I think that only an ego can have secrets and be afraid that others won't love it for that.
And only an ego can judge others to be happier about itself.
So in a higher sense, there are no boundaries, everything is accessible, all souls are connected.
Hi, I have considered this matter a lot, too.
When I ask, "What are the motives of X regarding Y?" , I am really asking for my own INTELLIGENCE and INTUITION to be cleared of illusions, so that I can judge and perceive clearly.
I believe the Yi answers in such a way as to allow me to gain access to deeper levels of my own understanding, by dissolving the blocks thereto.
Yet, there's a difference between that kind of question -- which arises frequently in the iching consultations -- and a kind of manipulation or "spying" kind of question, in which we delude ourselves into believing we can get secret knowledge of another person's private life.
Consider it, if you have something in your heart, which is private, and which you do not divulge to others, would you want another person to be able to learn of these deeply buried areas of private concern through the Yi?
The Yi is based on certain ethical principles, I believe, and to try to manipulate or distort these principles for our own private reasons -- (as in "spying" on the inner lives of others) -- will only backfire.
I could articulate this point more clearly , perhaps -- but I hope you get what I mean.
On a spiritual level - there are no others, we are really like leafs on a tree, and there are really no secrets [...]
So in a higher sense, there are no boundaries, everything is accessible, all souls are connected.
Gene, you make such an excellent point here. I feel that I too would be disinterested in a world where everyone knew what everyone else was thinking.
I feel that this thought stems from accepting the contrast that we have entered into in this world. I have this idea (and this is is solely a personal philosophy) that we chose to come into this world as individuals, to be seperate from one another so that we can grow and expand. I also feel that we are all one on a vibrational or soul level, if you will. Here on earth as human beings, we have the opportunity to experience separateness for the greater good. I'm not sure if I've explained this in written form as it is laid out in my head, but the point is, I totally get you.
Yes, until we are totally free of ego, and have learned all of our spiritual lessons, we will continue to come back here and learn. We need to not know what others are thinking (for the most part anyway) until we have been through all of our "trials."
What you've said here reminds me of something. I like to listen to Abraham Hicks occasionally. One of the lessons I've heard that seems to stick with me is that it's really none of our business what other people think about us, and even in a relationship with another it's about our relationship to ourself and what we are bringing to the relationship. It's so hard for me to not care what other people are thinking and feeling about me, so this must be one of my trials. I suppose the first step in fixing a problem is recognizing it
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).