Blog post: The elusive hexagram 57

[hilary]

‘No one can tell me,
Nobody knows,
Where the wind comes from,
Where the wind goes.’
AA Milne, ‘Wind on the Hill’
​

Xun has to be the most elusive hexagram. It’s awkward to translate (you need one word that means penetrating, interpenetrating, subtly, imperceptibly, gently, submitting…) and really tricky to pin down in readings. But then this is only its nature: it’s made of the wind trigram, doubled, and the wind isn’t known for being easily pinned down.
Most hexagrams can be read partly as verbs, partly as nouns. Hexagram 19 – Nearing, and an Approach. Hexagram 37 – the home and its people, and also home-making of all kinds. But Hexagram 57 feels like pure verb, or sometimes like pure adverb: not even a thing you do, but a way you might do many different things. Hopefully this comes across in how I described it for my book:

“‘Subtly penetrating, creating small success.
Fruitful to have a direction to go,
Fruitful to see the great person.’
Subtly penetrating means becoming part of something, or someone. It describes all-pervading influences, like the wind shaping the landscape.
You penetrate subtly by feeling your way into things, yielding gently to their nature. You shift your own ideas and expectations, and come to understand the situation from inside, on its own terms. And so, as you allow things to shape you, you also reach a place where you can shape them.
The old Chinese character for ‘Subtly Penetrating’ shows a stand bearing the official seals a ruler would bestow on those he trusted. Someone who bows down and accepts a seal is submitting to the order of things, entering in and receiving his place within it. Then his seal, sign of personal authenticity, endows him with influence and the power to ‘make his mark’.
Whatever penetrates subtly becomes influential – not by acting on situations or people to change their nature, but by becoming part of their nature and acting in them. Because it never acts as an antagonist, it never creates resistance and permeates everywhere…”
​

It’s about getting inside, being inside, being part of something and having it be part of you. This can be a way of understanding (non-analytically), or a way of influencing. I think of it as the opposite of waterproofing: becoming mutually permeable with your environment, and hence completely at home.
That experience can show up as synchronicity. Many years ago, someone at the I Ching Community asked what a string of synchronicities was and received hexagram 57: life inside the current, where the inner nature of things is apparent.
Xun is also your own inner nature becoming apparent. LiSe’s description of this is brilliant:

“The blueprint or the seal that one carries, decides all what one is or does. It penetrates every action like wind or roots can enter anything. It has no name, often its existence is not even known, but it is always there and directs everything one does or thinks. It decides the way one listens or looks to the world.”
​

We have a tendency to think of inner nature and the influences of the environment as being in opposition – not necessarily conflicting, but as two separate and contrasting things: ‘Am I being myself, or am I being influenced? Is this part of my true nature, or a product of conditioning?’ But this self-evident distinction evaporates like dew when you consider that your identity and authority, the way you show who you are and ‘make your mark’ on the world, is the seal bestowed on you as you submit to your place in the whole.
(Of course there are other hexagrams in which the distinction between self and environment is very real – essential thinking-material. 64*hexagrams: 64 different ways to see the world.)
Xun the hexagram shares its name with the doubled trigram that composes it: xun, the trigram of wind or wood. The elusiveness continues. Other trigrams have multiple associations but are identified primarily with one thing: fire; lake; mountain. Why, for xun, do we have to cope with ‘wind or wood’? Granted, you can see the similarity of movement between the draft under the door and the roots coming up through the tarmac… but still, they’re clearly two different things.
Except that, in fact, they aren’t. To demonstrate, let me ask you a question: is it windy, where you are? Have a look.

***

So you just looked for the wind – and unless you’re in a pitilessly barren urban environment, I’m guessing you looked to see how the plants are moving. You looked for xun, for wind-wood – as a single, indivisible thing. (Try looking at plants without seeing the movement of the air…) Xun is the trigram ‘blowing-in-the-wind’ – we just call it ‘wind/wood’ for short, and because we’re used to labelling things with nouns rather than verbs.
Here’s a very tiny snippet from module 2 of the Foundations Course (the one that’s becoming available now in Change Circle), on xun the trigram – click the big ‘play’ button first, then the ‘full screen’ one at the bottom right –

So there’s a quick summary of that adapting-is-influencing, outside-is-inside way of xun. In the hexagram it’s doubled: both inner and outer trigram.

‘Wind follows wind, Subtly Penetrating.
A noble one conveys mandates and carries out the work.’
​

The authors of the Image conveyed a great deal within their modest little formula. ? ? , wind following wind – that’s ‘following’ as in the name of Hexagram 17 (another hexagram about that ‘current’ we sometimes experience as synchronicities), and so it’s a word pregnant with meaning. (It isn’t used in any other hexagram’s Image.) Inner nature – or received mandate – naturally and inevitably flows outward, where it translates into work done. The mysterious intangible becomes wholly practical and tangible.

‘…So then I could tell them
Where the wind goes . . .
But where the wind comes from
Nobody knows.’
A.A. Milne
​

 

[Liselle]

57 unchanging was my reading in the "Gifts of Journalling" thread! Am happy to report that I think I'm beginning to see signs of it.

Also had 57 unchanging once when I thought it clearly meant something was my mandate or "seal" to do. It pretty much ended in sad failure when I eventually dropped the ball, but that was my fault.

 

[Liselle]

As for the confusing wind-wood thing...plants I can see, but the more "wood-like" something is, the less I see the air in it. Thin branches, yes...thick tree trunks, no...stacks of two-by-fours, never...

Unless...by "wood" does it mean wood the substance, or "the wood(s)" as a collection of trees? The moving air is visible by watching "the wood(s)" as a whole, since you're mostly seeing the tops of the trees at that point...?

 

[Liselle]

Oh well wait..."wind-wood" as a "single indivisible thing"...you can't see or feel the wind directly, you can only experience it as an interaction? By sight, as you watch things blow around, or in a tactile way as the air collides with something. If you are the tree trunk, you aren't necessarily moving, but that's how you feel the air and know it's there? (Something like that...this made more sense before I started writing it down...)

 

[hilary]

'Wood' meaning 'growing plants' - no, definitely not 'stack of 2x4s'! If you walk among big, old trees when it's windy, you certainly won't think of them as static. And yes, 'you can only experience it as an interaction' is exactly what I was trying to say, in a nutshell.

Unsurprisingly, the mini-video embedded in the original blog post hasn't survived the migration to the forum. Here it is.

I have a post in the pipeline about hexagram 57 in readings. (It seemed a good hexagram to deal with in lots of small increments!) I definitely associate it with change through building habits, which would fit nicely with journalling...