For the love of twinkies...

[precision grace]

I find people quite tricky at the best of times, and new people are the trickiest of them all. bleh

Anyway, couple of people from work are confusing me completely with their hot and cold attitude and I'm the world's worst case for not getting subtle hints which is why Yi and I tend to converse very regularly on matters of X(s).
This is the latest - I'm very fond of this person, but they are very difficult to figure out (I have not posted on Clarity about this particular X before)

I should very much appreciate your input on:

Why haven't I heard back from X? 51.1.6 > 35

Really? No, seriously?

What can I expect next from X? 46.1.2.3 > 24

What should be my attitude towards X? 50.6 > 32

So I sort of get 46 and 50 but 51 has me completely confused. I just hope poor X hasn't had their house raised to the ground (51.6.) or met with an equally alarming situation. I have worried that I may have misinterpreted their comments in the past and that's why they have been uncharacteristically very cold the last few times we met, but then do I have a right to expect people to always be sunny when they meet me? Everyone has off days, right?

Someone please help me with this 51. (and other hexes if you think it makes a difference) Thanks so much.:bows:

 

[ginnie]

X has apparently had a serious shock and is sort of incapacitated at the moment. Since there's nothing you can do to help X, best not to overthink this one.

 

[precision grace]

Hm. Thinking back to 51.6 and this idea about learning from the calamity that befalls the neighbour... this X is actually friends with another X I have asked about who was also friendly at first and then a bit off and so on and so forth. So perhaps this 51.6 is reflecting that situation and how something is to be learned from that earlier interaction. From my part, probably that things will improve by themselves but I still don't understand the whole 51-ness ..I mean what is/was so shocking? I am very sensitive to people's emotions, a bit too much perhaps. Example - there is a girl I pass in corridors at work a lot. She looks at me straight in the face but never smiles. She half smiled at me once. Whatever, young people are weird, right? Anyway, today I'm passing her on the stairs and suddenly get this massive emotional wave from her, like somehow I am important. Never happened before, not once. What's changed? That was a very 51 situation for no reason I can think of. (and this isn't the X btw, just an aside...while I try and figure out how to deal with emotionally charged people)

 

[foxx777]

Hm. Thinking back to 51.6 and this idea about learning from the calamity that befalls the neighbour... this X is actually friends with another X I have asked about who was also friendly at first and then a bit off and so on and so forth. So perhaps this 51.6 is reflecting that situation and how something is to be learned from that earlier interaction. From my part, probably that things will improve by themselves but I still don't understand the whole 51-ness ..I mean what is/was so shocking? I am very sensitive to people's emotions, a bit too much perhaps. Example - there is a girl I pass in corridors at work a lot. She looks at me straight in the face but never smiles. She half smiled at me once. Whatever, young people are weird, right? Anyway, today I'm passing her on the stairs and suddenly get this massive emotional wave from her, like somehow I am important. Never happened before, not once. What's changed? That was a very 51 situation for no reason I can think of. (and this isn't the X btw, just an aside...while I try and figure out how to deal with emotionally charged people)

I have found over the years that either people are extremely complex and unpredictable, or I have some defect which prevents me from understanding people in general. Could 51 be saying that you yourself somehow have shocked X? And as you say, the former X as well? How many times I have innocently gone about my business only to find that I have stunned someone with a remark. But then, this may be only me.....

The only reason I am saying this (and of course you and I are different people, so I can only conjecture here) is that even in middle age, I am finding that I am sometimes totally clueless about the affect I have had on someone with my words. Just something to mull over, grist for the mill, as it were. The other castings seem hopeful about relating to X.

50.6 shows something which has been transformed and can be put to marvelous use. 32 is a long-time enduring situation. 46.1.2.3 seems all about advancing, and 24 is a joyous return ("friends come and go, on the seventh day is return").

 

[precision grace]

I have found over the years that either people are extremely complex and unpredictable, or I have some defect which prevents me from understanding people in general. Could 51 be saying that you yourself somehow have shocked X? And as you say, the former X as well? How many times I have innocently gone about my business only to find that I have stunned someone with a remark. But then, this may be only me.....

The only reason I am saying this (and of course you and I are different people, so I can only conjecture here) is that even in middle age, I am finding that I am sometimes totally clueless about the affect I have had on someone with my words. Just something to mull over, grist for the mill, as it were. The other castings seem hopeful about relating to X.

50.6 shows something which has been transformed and can be put to marvelous use. 32 is a long-time enduring situation. 46.1.2.3 seems all about advancing, and 24 is a joyous return ("friends come and go, on the seventh day is return").

well I kinda think that too although cannot figure out how/why. but like you say, I'm oft oblivious to how I come across to others so it wouldn't be surprising generally speaking. I think that maybe X thought I didn't want to collaborate on a project but when I emailed him about it today was shocked to learn that I do? I had been a bit overwhelmed by his enthusiasm originally and also needed to speak to our boss about it first, and had deadlines etc to deal with but he had only mentioned it last week, so it's not like it had been very long. Also 51 could be referring to external, unrelated shocks at the end of the day. I had just asked what X's reaction is/will be if he hadn't read it yet to my email and got 37.4.5.6 > 55 so that's positive I think.

I am worrying over nothing I am sure, but since leaving my last job where I thought I'd made friends just to find I hadn't has been a bit of a shock to the system so now I feel like I have to double check every instance of people being friendly to me so that I don't get my hopes up for nothing again.

 

[goddessliss]

Just what the word twinkies means cause in Australia well it means something on the man's anatomy. No offense to anyone meant. just sayin' - Liss

 

[precision grace]

Just what the word twinkies means cause in Australia well it means something on the man's anatomy. No offense to anyone meant. just sayin' - Liss

hahaha that's brilliant. and strangely appropriate

Twinkies: