Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
Hey Chris,
What exactly do you mean by this phrase? To me, infrastructure means the inner workings of something, or how something is built, or what holds something together.
What is the difference, for example, of the infrastructures of, hex 01 and hex 24?
But what is the foundation of a hex, and how does the foundation differ between hexes, for example 1 and 24? I don't want an analogy to another hex (I don't even know what that means), I just want a description of the foundation of those two hexes.
Are you saying the foundation of 24 is pruning?
pukua said:And why did you choose 27 to be the best fit for infrastructure? Couldn't other hexes do just as well?
the 27-ness of 24 describes the infrastructure through analogy to the VAGUE, or GENERIC, qualities of 23. In 23 the PARTICULAR focus on pruning covers the GENERAL focus on preparation of next year and so a generic sense of, focus upon, house-keeping and preparation - patterns of RETURN, a re-beginning, re-birth - the repetition, the cycles, of nature etc etc. Thus the SKELETAL form of 24 acts to support what we then flesh out 24 with - and so move form the general to the particular.
Ok, so you're saying "the infrastructure of 24 has to do with the GENERAL focus on preparation of next year and so a generic sense of, focus upon, house-keeping and preparation"? I don't really see the connection. Just because you return to a particular way doesn't necessarily imply house-keeping, does it?
Also, it seems confusing to read, "the 27-ness of 24 describes the infrastructure".
If you consider the term "infrastructure" as relating to the whole hex, yet the 27-ness described above only relates to 1/64th of the infrastructure of th hex, then each of the other hexes describe an additional 1/64th of that hex. But you're only using it with regard to 27.
Ok, I got it,... you're using infrastructure to describe an aspect of each specific hex, whereas I had thought you meant the general infrastructure of all hexes.
pakua said:Your description of the relationships between the hexes with xor'ing sounds reasonable, but how do you know it's not just another method of making patterns fit your ideas? There are many of those already, and we can rationalize any of them so they sound good.
Sure, I understand there's a lot of work, reason and effort put into it, and it makes a lot of sense, but it doesn't really answer my question.
The way it seems to me is, the way you see the world, and how the brain works within that world, is how you made your system. It's one and the same, isn't it?
IOW, if the brain worked differently, the system would work differently.
pakua said:Not that I'm saying it's wrong, since I have no idea, but it doesn't seem any more provable than the magical/mystical method.
pakua said:But it reminds me of those old books where they compare modern physics with Buddhist philosophy, and they're both saying the same thing, using different words.
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).