Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
Rosada is it still considered a square if the two planets are more than 10 degrees apart from the right angle? For instance my Sun is in 17 and the planets in 10th house are in first degrees of Capricorn. In astrological reports I have the square is not mentioned.Sun square Saturn - At every beginning you are hemmed in by obstacles all around you...
You are counting from the Sun placement, me from rising (Pisces). Albeit I don't have moon and Venus there. Just the first three planets.Capricorn stellium in the 4th here (Saturn Uranus Neptune moon Venus) yikes
Well they are wrong, simply being in the same sign does not make planets conjunct. Planets are seen as conjunct within about 8 or 9 degrees of each other with 9 degrees being very weak and 1 -5 being much stronger. Some people might go even wider than 9 degrees to call it a conjunction, people vary in their opinions of how wide a conjunction can be but to say planets are conjunct just because they are in the same sign isn't true.because some people on the net consider any placement of two or more planets in one sign as a conjunction.
how does it make you an indigo child? Have a hazy idea of what one of them is off to Google.The stellium in 10th makes me an indigo child
If you have multiple planets in a certain house then that area of life is very important in your life, it's where the action is and the aspects they form will show more. But, as I have found, with these popular house systems a person can think they have a 6th house sun all their life which never fits at all only to find if they use a different house system they have a 7th house sun which makes sense. The equal house system is next to useless IMO, that's where you just count the houses at 30 degree intervals around the chart. I once saw an old astrologer who did things her own way and used the house system that Jung used she said. I found out my sun was in another house than I thought and it made a lot more sense. I have an idea which system Jung used was but I'm not entirely sure. On Astrodienst site you can put in your birth detail and you then have the option to see your chart in all the various house systems.I'm curious about the effect of having multiple planets in a given house. For instance I have stelliums in the 7th (Sun, Mars, Mercury) and 10th (Uranus, Saturn, Neptune in Capricorn) and my Uranus conjuncts my Midheaven which is placed in last degrees of Sagittarius - what a mess, no? The stellium in 10th makes me an indigo child although I haven't had some of its characteristics such as difficulties in studies and being a trouble maker.
I heard it in an astrology podcast and it's not about having planets in the 10th but having three slow-moving ones - Saturn, Uranus and Neptune- in conjunction with each other. I had no idea about the notion before.obviously so no reason to believe that several planets in the 10th make you an Indigo child.
I don't know. I was mistaken in saying all house systems start with Ascendant as house 1, the Equal house system doesn't and the one I think my astrologer may have used the Meridian system doesn't either being also an equal house system. I'm not sure she did use that system it's just when I apply it to my chart on the Astrodienst website it tallies with the house placements she used. If you join Astrodienst and put in your details you can check to see what any system does to your houses. It's only Meridian as far as I can see which gives me correct house placements but I guess it's all open to interpretation. Perhaps the other systems were right and that is wrong, I don't know. In favour of Placidus it does make sense to me to make the Ascendant the beginning of the first house, I really can't see it makes sense to plonk the Ascendant in the middle of another house.Trojina, is Placidus the one that doesn't work well when you get too far into the northern latitudes? Do you have another one you like that you'd recommend, or is it best just to try a few?
Ah so she was talking about a generation, all the people born around the same time would have had this conjunction somewhere in their charts.I heard it in an astrology podcast and it's not about having planets in the 10th but having three slow-moving ones - Saturn, Uranus and Neptune- in conjunction with each other.
Agreed. I didn't even know there were systems that put it elsewhere. Seems to me it'd ruin the entire concept of an ascendant. But house systems are one of the many things I know nothing about.I really can't see it makes sense to plonk the Ascendant in the middle of another house.
Many using Whole Sign astrology do, indeed, consider all planets in one sign to be conjunct.Well they are wrong, simply being in the same sign does not make planets conjunct. Planets are seen as conjunct within about 8 or 9 degrees of each other with 9 degrees being very weak and 1 -5 being much stronger. Some people might go even wider than 9 degrees to call it a conjunction, people vary in their opinions of how wide a conjunction can be but to say planets are conjunct just because they are in the same sign isn't true.
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).