Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
29. Abyss
Line 4:
Jugs of wine and a food bowl,
repeatedly using a bucket,
bringing these in as agreed through the window, eventually.
Without fault.
Making a detour to avoid trouble. There is nothing wrong with this.
Line 6:
Tied with a good rope,
placed in thorn bushes.
For three years no gains.
Misfortune.
Something is bound to an inaccessible place, so that it cannot be of advantage for a long time. Things don't go well.
Hexagram is changing to:
6. Conflict
Conflict. autiousness while in the middle of this brings good fortune,
at the end misfortune.
It is beneficial to see a senior person.
A disadvantage for crossing the big river.
There is a conflict, so there is no trust in the other party any more. One must be cautious now, while in the middle of this conflict. If one needs to stay cautious things would not go well. An advisor or mediator could be helpful. This situation is a problem when important things are at stake.
any ideas
I knew someone like this who acted similarly under similar circumstances, but he was vindictive and used pseudonyms with which to engage in cyberstalking and false accusations, and was out to cause trouble. From what you say, and from H29.4.6 > 6, it does seem to indicate that he can be safely ignored, unless of course he does up the ante, at which time you will have to take some action.
From the following translation, in any case, one does get some indication that this indeed may be in the offing:
When I look at Fox777 interpretation of hex 6 and it points toward a mediator I am thinking that could be legal person however I wont be taking those measures NOW depending on his next move as I know there will be one also line 6 I think this is me in the place with no access. Pocossin I need to speak with my phone company anyway so I will get the number blocked would you be able to tell me what you see in the lines your readings always seem to ring true with me I was thinking that if I block the number so quick it may increase the agitation on the other hand its sending a clear message as when ever he has attempted to make contact I have blocked that avenue he doesn't usually call and that is the first time I have called back I only called back because It was on my business line and thought it may have been work related as didn't recognise the number. Thanks Hopex funny you say that about keeping your enemies closer I remember his brother telling him that on an issue when we were friends. Yes we were friends to a degree before the business relationship i don't mean to sound egotistical but he used to copy me allot and was one of these delusional people also cannot seem to entertain himself as he doesn't read at all and as I was saying yes most likely he has had some sought of loss financial or emotional it was usually when he contacted me in the past I think the best thing is that I continue to keep ignoring him and pray he goes away. I have been basically reacting to his every move like when I first blocked him on facebook he made a comment then I blocked him that really frustrated him as that was a real insight to my movements on a personal level.
Thank you all for your help I think the general feeling is keep ignoring him
I have to say, Steve, as stated I knew someone who sounds similar, and broke with him under similar circumstances, and he DID escalate such stalking behavior, and became quite vindictive and persistent. So I cannot doubt you on this, having experienced it. I would agree the silence on the phone is stalkerish, and I felt that way during my own incidents.The problem is you dont know him and what he is like he disrupted my life on an off for four years he has control issues and made my life HELL like constantly turning up unannounced and drunk at 3am when in business with him he 90% unapprochable I was lucky that I got him out of my life I have made it quite clear that I don't want contact.I do not have time to have this imbalanced person disrupting my life anymore. The reason he is calling me is because he no longer controls me via the business. The only reason I got rid of him that he screwed everything up and left me with the bill and took his name off the business. (charming)
When you call someone then you say nothing on the other end THAT is the action of a stalker. These signs are subtle at the moment but people have been killed by exactly the same situations when someone is doing these things it has to be taken seriously. Deep down he is not a nice person have you heard the saying "give a man power and you will see his true colors" well I have seen his. I did call back and he didnt answer remember and if he does need help I am not the one he should be looking to its been 18 months since i have seen him. I dont how you are getting he is a poor sad man when I am getting a reading like this? Hex 6 is conflict straight out I have never found this hex to be positive and 29 to me has always been a situation of some description that you need GET OUT OF..I gave this guy a million chances to act like a human being and I have lost friendships for allot allot less than the things he has done to me.
Sorry also the question was what do I need to know about him contacting me.
That's just what I have done.Yes...but what is this translation you are using. And its not just a translation its someones commentaries you are quoting too in every single post you respond to here. (and I have to say some aren't very good commentaries IMO so they mislead you ie 29.4 cannot really be summed up by 'make a detour')
There is a difference between a translation and a commentary. A commentary is just someone thoughts on the I Ching...its not the I Ching itself. So in every single answer here you refer directly to someones elses commentary but don't say who they are. The words you have put in red bold here are someones commentary aren't they ? Or are they yours ?
I feel you do need to say whose work you are using. If we quote people it is necessary to say who we are quoting. I want to know if this is Ewalds work ? I think it is.
As a writer surely you know about referencing peoples work ?
ETA. Suggestion. If all your answers are basically pasted pages from this persons work you could just put in your signature "all responses taken from Ewald at Eclectic Energies " or wherever it is from .
http://www.eclecticenergies.com/iching/about.phpDifferences with previous text
This has resulted in a I Ching translation that is in various details different from the Wilhelm/Baynes translation that was previously on this site. This is not just a difference in style (Wilhelm's style seems to be substantially influenced by Goethe's), but also of interpretation.
While my initial version was still reminiscent of Wilhelm's, my interpretation has changed in lots of details with the appliance of all kinds of checks on the text "making sense," checking out all kinds of aspects of context, and making lots of small improvements on the wording.
I'm hoping to have written a translation and commentary of the I Ching that is more clear and accurate than what was on this site before. I also hope it to be more helpful and supporting.
That's what I have done. There must have been a reason Berkers viewed 4 in this manner. I don't know what it is, but then, Wilhelm can really stray as well. Of course if the commentary were mine, I would not enclose it with the translation within the quote block, and yes, as a writer I know about referencing people's work. I guess I was simply trying to wait until I had to, as I was neither being paid, contracted, nor assuming the stance of a scholar here - just an i ching tosser spewing out remarks .
Edited my post above, with commentary from Berkers on his own work....Mmmm I see. Thanks for the clarification.
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).