Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
Why is anyone wasting their time with this reading? Has anyone a bet riding on it?
Did Judge Brett Kavanaugh really sexually assault Christine Ford?
21.3.5>13
21.3 - Bites on old dried meat and strikes something poisonous. Slight humiliation. No blame.
21.5 - Bites on dried lean meat. Receives yellow gold. Perseveringly aware of danger. No blame.
(Wilhelm/Baynes,)
Hex 21 often refers to legal decisions. Biting Through.
Dried out or cured meat is a very old issue. Poison (or decay) speaks for itself.
Yellow Gold is the color of the middle way, the case is difficult but clear cut, and the decision just.
Both lines say no blame (alternately "Without fault.")
No, Brett Kavanaugh did not sexually assault Christine Ford.
- LL
Good point about the possibility of 21.3 referring to something poisonous but only resulting in alight humiliation, Soshin!
2.5 "Receives the golden arrow. Perseveringly aware of danger." Makes me think that even though he is confirmed, this charge will hang over him and he will never be out from under it's shadow.
As of today I think he will be confirmed.
This delay is just to allow the general public to calm down and get bored with the drama and to then meekly accept the appointment Even if it costs votes in the short term that doesn't matter because the Republicans want one of their own on the Supreme Court and they are willing to play a long game here. His confirmation may cost them the election and even Trump's re-election but this guy will give them the Supreme Court for the next 40 years! Goodbye Roe vs Wade.
I think everyone is reading into this reading. Since the Senate is composed of 100 individuals, with individual (and group) thought, The question is impossible to answer. 'What does the Senate think?'
What does the Senate think of Brett Kavanaugh? 22.3 ->27
He was meticulously dressed, groomed, and mosturized, and maybe powdered.
That is how he appeared, were you in the room.
K.I.S.S.
According to this reading, Mr. Kavanaugh may very well get the office (recieve yellow gold). Not because the accusations were wrong (poisoned, old dried meat DOES very much speak about something rotten hidden in the past), but because a majority of the Members of the Senate may rule in favor of him.
On the other hand, LiSe writes about 21,5:
[FONT=&]When one makes the root of difficulties visible or conscious, one creates the possibility to do something about it. There is a natural resistance against doing this, because it means change, which is usually hazardous.
If this interpretations relates to action after something poisonous hidden in the past came to light, (and I repeat, there IS something in 21,3) then a few Republican Members of the Senate may rule against their natural resistance against ruling to the disadvantage of one of their own kind.
Of course this would be hazardous, because in the - although unlikely - case of the Democrats winning a Senate Majority, a Liberal could become SCOTUS.
In my personal opinion neither of this will happen. Only in the case the FBI would bring the poisonous dried meat to the light of the day [/FONT]irrevocably [FONT=&]for all to see and would convict Mr. Kavanaugh of perjury.
But 21,3 speaks of only slight humilation. Conviction of perjury wouldn't be only a slight humilation, it would be absolutely devastating.
(P.S.: I tried my best to be as "objective" as possible despite of me - if I were American, which I am obviously not - leaning heavily towards the left wing of the Democrats.)
Namaste,
[/FONT]:bows:
soshin
Not an objective reading here either Soshin.
The question was did he commit the crime.
A yellow gold arrow is not a position or reward he receives, the commentaries say it is a fair legal judgment. The bitter feelings towards the man who appointed Kavanaugh are plainly poisonous.
Both of the lines say "no blame" alternately "no fault."
You can of course disagree with the Yi if you wish, but this reading - 21.3.5>13
- says no, Brett Kavanaugh did not sexually assault Christine Ford.
Why don't you do a reading asking if she was lying or not? And we can discuss what you get.
- LL
lavalamp
"Why did Ford claim Kavanaugh assaulted her?"
13 unchanging.
Fellowship With Men. Union Of Forces. Cliques.
"Legge: Union of Forces describes a condition which is the opposite of the preceding hexagram of Divorcement. What was there distress and obstruction is here a union of forces. But it must be based entirely on the good of the whole, without any taint of selfishness."
The Yi cautions against selfish tainted motives in such a situation.
The Yi here says it was because of her group she brought this claim.
Conspicuously absent, any suggestion that she was motivated by actually being done wrong by Kavanaugh.
- LL
.
And the Yi said plainly regarding the charge against Kavanaugh "No Fault/No blame." In of itself certainly not "hard evidence" no, but certainly should give pause to any student of the Yi that thinks an accuser's word is proof enough of a heinous crime.
- LL
Also one thing that I think that is always worth noting is when the Yi likes somebody and when it doesn't. The Yi can be very critical of people it does not like. And there plenty of lines with which to indicate a person is not a good person.
And here, the Yi describes the opponents of Kavanaugh as "disintegrating influences." Not in any way superior fair or noble, it is a most unflattering and inferior description.
- LL
Did Judge Brett Kavanaugh really sexually assault Christine Ford?
21.3.5>13
21.3 - Bites on old dried meat and strikes something poisonous. Slight humiliation. No blame.
21.5 - Bites on dried lean meat. Receives yellow gold. Perseveringly aware of danger. No blame.
(Wilhelm/Baynes,)
Hex 21 often refers to legal decisions. Biting Through.
Dried out or cured meat is a very old issue. Poison (or decay) speaks for itself.
Yellow Gold is the color of the middle way, the case is difficult but clear cut, and the decision just.
Both lines say no blame (alternately "Without fault.")
No, Brett Kavanaugh did not sexually assault Christine Ford.
- L
No, Brett Kavanaugh did not sexually assault Christine Ford.
"Why did Ford claim Kavanaugh assaulted her?"
13 unchanging.
Fellowship With Men. Union Of Forces. Cliques.
"Legge: Union of Forces describes a condition which is the opposite of the preceding hexagram of Divorcement. What was there distress and obstruction is here a union of forces. But it must be based entirely on the good of the whole, without any taint of selfishness."
The Yi cautions against selfish tainted motives in such a situation.
The Yi here says it was because of her group she brought this claim. Maybe she was pushed into it.
Conspicuously absent, any suggestion that she was motivated by actually being done wrong by Kavanaugh.
- LL
I think we have gotten way off the original question here. If people want to continue I think they should start a new thread.
An alternative interpretation of this reading.
Because of her sense of being a 'person in harmony' - a member of a community. In other words, because of her sense of civic duty. The 'people in harmony in the wilds' have come out beyond the walls of their own village, left the safety of 'their group' behind, and ventured into open country. There, they join together with people who are not their sort at all, in a greater cause.....
People in Harmony. She was saying, 'Me, Too,' joining a movement to make a difference.
By the way, I think this answer was intended for LL in particular,
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).