Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
This morning I heard that an old friend of the family had been taken ill and was in hospital. I asked what the outlook for his recovery would be, at least short term. And cast 60.1>29.
Would anyone get that a person is dead or about to die from that reading?
This morning I heard that an old friend of the family had been taken ill and was in hospital. I asked what the outlook for his recovery would be, at least short term.
In China the client is usually making the Hexagram. At times they may have no idea what system the master or practitioner will read it with... Yet all systems work, as the "packed" information in the Hexagram can be unpacked in different ways.
So you don't need to make something different so the Hexagram can be read with "WWG", that is already included in every reading by default.
It's a question to an Oracle with an answer from an Oracle. An Oracle that is not some sort of mechanistic cog turning contraption whereby after midnight you will get an entirely different answer. That is nonsensical. If I ask you a question the only reason date would matter would be if circumstances had changed in that time, there's no reason date has any relevance otherwise.
Oh I think you do which is why when people start using WWG/other methods here in answers to querents Hilary asks them to post a link in their signature to an explanation of what method they use so the querent is aware what you are giving is something entirely different to the mainly text based interpretations offered here.
Lets say we are deep underwater. And we want to light a match. We will find out that even though if we were in other conditions it would have been very easy, in this specific environment, its next to impossible.
Lets say we are in the desert and we want to light a match. Much easier now.
Suggests that our environment changes how everything that is happening within it operates.
Now, lets say we ask a question in a fire branch day. At that day we ask about a situation where we have taken approach very related to "water" element, we are deep within ourselves, seeking renewal and don't want to interact with the environment much.
Our line will usually be Water or Metal and in both cases will be very weak. Because the day and month of asking present an environment that require us to be open and expanding. If we can't our line will be weak.
Lets say we are with exactly the same approach, but we ask in a water day. Now, our line will be very strong as the environment is supporting it. Now, we would be in a desert if we were attempting to light a match.
That matters a lot.
So what does the Day matters... Depend what we consider when reading. If we think we should "dash out" the 5 elements and none of this works then the Chinese Solar Calendars will be meaningless, then of course, it matters very little.
If we have found meaning in all of it, then its very clear, it just show what the environment is going through and how we fit into that with our chosen approach.
Then look in the part of the forum for reading questions. Has it happen that someone asked a question, made a hexagram and had no idea how they could read it, so was expecting forum members to do it?
Then they wouldn't make it addressing specific system, yet if it happen and there was a correct answer even once, it suggests that the person that is making the Hexagram may not address a specific method and the reading can still work with a system(text with the lines in this case) that it wasn't made specifically for. : )
We have made readings when the person didn't even knew what hexagram was. They just open a website, thought about the question and hit a button. And we could still read it with good enough accuracy, back then.
While I'm open to the idea if a specific system is clearly stated that can influence the outcome, I don't think it would influence it in such a way that it would be unreadable by other systems. In my practice so far all questions had relevance when looked with all systems I know(or even systems I didn't knew at the time).
Then look in the part of the forum for reading questions. Has it happen that someone asked a question, made a hexagram and had no idea how they could read it, so was expecting forum members to do it?
Then they wouldn't make it addressing specific system, yet if it happen and there was a correct answer even once, it suggests that the person that is making the Hexagram may not address a specific method and the reading can still work with a system(text with the lines in this case) that it wasn't made specifically for. : )
We have made readings when the person didn't even knew what hexagram was. They just open a website, thought about the question and hit a button. And we could still read it with good enough accuracy, back then.
While I'm open to the idea if a specific system is clearly stated that can influence the outcome, I don't think it would influence it in such a way that it would be unreadable by other systems. In my practice so far all questions had relevance when looked with all systems I know(or even systems I didn't knew at the time).
One other rule
If something about the way you do readings is unfamiliar to most members (eg the method, the text), please edit your signature to include a link to an explanation. (You can always write this yourself in Exploring Divination.)
Then look in the part of the forum for reading questions. Has it happen that someone asked a question, made a hexagram and had no idea how they could read it, so was expecting forum members to do it?
Then they wouldn't make it addressing specific system, yet if it happen and there was a correct answer even once, it suggests that the person that is making the Hexagram may not address a specific method and the reading can still work with a system(text with the lines in this case) that it wasn't made specifically for. : )
That's exactly what we don't want. We don't want people just pressing buttons, doing nothing and coming here for interpretation. They are meant to be thinking for themselves, reading the text supplied. If they just click a button to come and get any kind of reading regardless then well that's not the point of this forum as I understand it.
It's called 'shared readings' not 'give me a reading, any kind of reading, so I don't have to think about it' that's not the purpose of this section.
was in hospital....
I asked what the outlook for his recovery would be, at least short term. And cast 60.1>29.
I'm open to posting a detailed explanation on how it works in my point of view...
But I get the impression no one actually wants to know.
But if you actually do want to know, I can post and explain from a reading that showed if very clearly for me some years ago and its easy to see there where and how parts of the answer can be in the text, but if we don't count the day and the lines, even though accurate it may be misleading...
That way you can post WWG interpretations to your hearts content, if the querent wants it.
Yet all systems work
Yes, the comprehension was beyond anything I could imagine. I'm still recovering from it...
Your barbs tickle.
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).