...life can be translucent

Menu

27.1

clarissa

visitor
Joined
Jul 15, 1970
Messages
235
Reaction score
3
Thanks Chris. One question about something else..briefly: You say that with hex 39 the blockage is from within. Which hex is blockage from without?
 

lightofdarkness

(deceased)
Joined
Mar 16, 1970
Messages
1,025
Reaction score
3
hex 39 has a mountain base and so a focus on dealing with blocks/stops and so self-restraint. The TOP part of the hexagram is water - water in the top position reflects issues of control (as compared to water in the base position reflecting containment - thus containment doubled gives us control (hex 29))

39 reads "with self-restraint comes control". If we XOR it with 27 we get 37 - a focus on the benefits etc of rigid structure enabling tension release. Thus the skeletal form of 39 is concerned with rigid structure.

The main focus in 39 is of experiencing obstructions but also being obstructive - it covers (a) going AGAINST the flow, standing up against mindless flow, but also (b) Going WITH the flow by BYPASSING obsticles in a structured way (we go around with intent, we do not surrender to the flow, just use it)

Context therefore determines (a) or (b).

The opposite of 39 is 38. Here we deal with oppositions from OUTSIDE - we are not like others and so put on a facade (fire top).

Lake in LOWER position represents self-reflection, not just as metaphor, as focusing on issues of being etc, but also literally in the form of presentation of self (self promotion etc - gets very showbiz ;-) - by putting on a facade so people deal with that and leave us alone 'behind' the mask. - thus 38 reads "with self-reflection comes direction/an ideology" - and that will also generate oppositions! ;-))

A showbiz persona is reflected here, as is the sexual vibe of self-replication, be it literally through sex or figuratively through becoming a 'pop star' and so everyone wants to be 'like' you!

Xor 27 with 38 gives us hex 40 and so a focus on tension release by relaxing structure (done in 38 through presenting a mirror to 'out there' and so others see themselves in that mirror and that reduces the tension of the opposition etc)

Thus the skeletal form of 38 and 39 are both about tension release, 39 through rigid form, 38 through a more relaxed form.

In turn, XORing 27 with 40 and 37 will elicit 38 and 39 respectively as THEIR generic, skeletal forms. Thus the skeletal form of 37 is described by analgy to a rigid structure, as the skeletal form of 40 is described by analogy to 38.

The common ground of lake and mountain is their focus on BONDING - issues on sharing space with another/others. Mountain is contractive, within, Lake is expansive, without.

Dont confuse properties of mountain with properties of 39. Mountain is the BASE trigram and in that position elicits a sense of blocking/stopping/self-restraining.

With the water top so we have a sense of issues of CONTROL operating in this mountain context.

Blocking/Stopping DOUBLED in described by mountain at the top (and in particular hex 52) where the reactive blocking has been converted to being proactive, we use it to be discerning etc.

Mountain associates with Buddhist perspectives - we learn from our suffering ;-) (it maps to the emotion of sadness/grief that when made proactive become discernment and so quality control).

When we use emotions, water maps to issues of rejection/rejecting so in 39 we have a context of sadness/grief in which is operating issues of rejection/rejecting and so 'obstructions' etc

In 38 we are dealing with issues of the emotion of acceptance in a context of love(sex).

Chris.
 

annietyme

visitor
Joined
Mar 1, 1970
Messages
136
Reaction score
1
Wow, that was a lot more interpretation of the same hex I was given in my message thread.

different viewpoints can give so much different interpretations/insights.

Thank you Chris, even though I know that was not directly for me ;)

Annie
 

lightofdarkness

(deceased)
Joined
Mar 16, 1970
Messages
1,025
Reaction score
3
To add another aspect - in the binary sequence 39 pairs with 53 - the only difference is the top line. This line covers the notion of unconditional vs conditional. 39 is unconditional in its manner, 53 is conditional.

Thus 53 reflects a focus on maturing, a general relationship that gets increasingly particular, increasingly entangled. There is a conditional 'bent' at work when compared to 39 that has a developemental aire but is unconditional, one goes against the flow absolutely - inflexible, rigid etc. (even bypassing obstructions is done 'rigidly')

53 has ITS skeletal form described by hexagram 63 - IOW the generic nature of 53 is described by analogy to 63 and so a focus on a vague sense of completion, getting a sequence of events 'correct' - a sense that is then refined to give us 53.

At the other end of the dimension, 38 shares space with 54. 54 is the unconditional of the two and focuses on issues of the 'premature' or 'immature' . The energy expended is at the beginning either due to immature behaviour or out of some necessity out of one's control - one has to do their best in difficult circumstances and so the issues of high energy expenditure at the start.

54 has ITS skeletal form described by analogy to properties of 64 - a focus on getting a sequence of events 'out of order' but also a focus on remaining open, avoiding closure too soon etc.

38 is more particular about its energy use, more focused etc., and so more conditional.

Since the universal IC is what we can call a 'regular' network so all is linked together - so there is a LOT of material available to flesh out a hexagram, trigram, or even a line.

Chris.
 

hilary

Administrator
Joined
Apr 8, 1970
Messages
19,154
Reaction score
3,419
Strictly speaking, Annie, you did post in the wrong forum. Like it says on the page - 'divination discussion' is for talking about divination in general; 'Friends area' is the reading exchange. But in practice a lot of people ignore the distinction, so it's probably just pot luck...
 

annietyme

visitor
Joined
Mar 1, 1970
Messages
136
Reaction score
1
Thanks Hilary,

yeah I mistook divination discussion the wrong way. I'll be better at posting in the correct forum from here on out. ;)

Annie
 

clarissa

visitor
Joined
Jul 15, 1970
Messages
235
Reaction score
3
Annie,

What I like about Chris' approach is that he just gives you the information about the hexagrams...and lets you decide how it fits your situation. (I'm not saying that there aren't others here who mainly stick to this approach) I DO appreciate hearing ideas about what something may mean...but I don't like people giving me their views counselor-style.
 
J

jesed

Guest
In the Tratitional Teachings:

You never try to understand a line alone; always in the context of the entire hexagram.

In 27: the top line is yang, has enough energy to food himself and anothers; lines 5-2 are yin: they don't have enough energy, so they need to be nourishing by top line.

So, the bottom line is yang. One can expect that he can food by himself. But he doesn't: he is expecting to be nourishing by top line; and felling envy of line 5-2. That's not honorable. (In the Commentaries of the line, is saying that expression: "not honorable")

Plus: the magic tortoise is a mythical simbol of self-nourishment. So, you drop the self-nourishment expecting someone else do it for you.

Plus: in Yi Jing, some times you have "toirtoise shells". When it happens, you don't need to ask the Oracle. So, one of the various meanings of 27.1 is: "you are asking the Oracle something you don't need to ask, but find out by yourself"

Now, in Traditional Teachings, there are several levels of interpretation: practical, wisdom, esoteric, the relation between you and the Oracle, etc.

Another thing. 23 has several meanings. In relationship matters, is breaking-up. But another level, refering to the relationship whit the Oracle, is that someone injust is abusing of the Oracle.

So, in this case, you have 2 possible levels:
a) In Practical level: he sees you as someone that dropped her self-nourishment by envy, and that's why he is breaking-up the relationship
b) In your relation whit the Oracle level: The Oracle is claimming: "Asking me something you have to find out by yourself is not honorable but an abuse"

I'm not preching you; just showing the traditional interpretation of your answer. Of course, I honor your own way and freedom.

Best wishes
 

annietyme

visitor
Joined
Mar 1, 1970
Messages
136
Reaction score
1
Clarissa,

Ooh I understand! Conselor style interpretations or whatever you want to call it can seem a bit condesending in a way.

I appreciate any and all interpretations and insight. But to each their own! ;)

Annie
 

hilary

Administrator
Joined
Apr 8, 1970
Messages
19,154
Reaction score
3,419
Hi Jesed,
Those were two possibilities that came to my mind, also. What tradition are you referring to?
 
J

jesed

Guest
Hi Hilary

Whilelm was part of a Tradition, related to Taoism; and he introduced this tradition to Occidental Culture. Not only by his books but by an inner circle of study (including Jung and others).

That is the traditional teachings I'd been learning.

Best wishes
 

kevin

Supporter
Clarity Supporter
Joined
Jan 11, 1973
Messages
749
Reaction score
84
Wilhelm - To whom I will be ever grateful, was part of a late Chinese tradition of the Yijing... Heavily influenced by a few thousand years of Confucian thought.

Daoism was perhaps rather smothered in the Yijing by this time.

It is a book of Changes as well as the Book of Change

;)

--Kevin
 
J

jesed

Guest
Hi Kevin

That is, in deed, the usual point of view... but...

Someone said that Confucionism is just a branch of Taoism. (More explicit on the social consequences of The Way that Lao Tze; but even there things are not what they seem ;) )

For some of us Taoism exist before Confucio and before Lao Tze.
happy.gif


Best wishes
 

hilary

Administrator
Joined
Apr 8, 1970
Messages
19,154
Reaction score
3,419
I came to the Yijing via the Eranos translation - a very different route from Wilhelm. So it's all the more striking when ideas converge like this. (Or when I find an interpretation or 'best fit' translation I'd spent forever working out is already there in Wilhelm's version...)
 

kevin

Supporter
Clarity Supporter
Joined
Jan 11, 1973
Messages
749
Reaction score
84
Hi Jessed

Received view?! - It is indeed fact.
biggrin.gif


Sure there are ideas in neo Confucian thought which relate to Daoism... But the moral and social imperatives in Confucian thought are not reflected in Lao Tsu... I think.

"More explicit"... I can see what you mean - sort of... But, for me, the directness and the imperative nature, of Neo Confician thought, speaks of a concrete social reality far removed from the dynamic space that Daoism invites me into.

The history... Wang Bi onwards is pretty self evident...

Role of Women in later Chinese thought?

Though... I agree, I like my Daoism pretty raw too... Pre Lao Tsu works.

(Please let no-one challenge me on 'was that Daoism then?'

biggrin.gif


We are perhaps of a mind here
happy.gif


--Kevin
 
B

bruce

Guest
My ideas of Yi have grown so many new branches since I arrived here, just a few short years ago. The work of folks like Brad, LiSe, Hilary, Chris and several others have opened up new understanding for me, and I am grateful.

I understand better why the Yi's foresight didn't always pan out for me. I misinterpreted readings. It's that simple.
 
J

jesed

Guest
Thinking Taoism is just Lao Tze (so, if you don't find some idea in Lao Tze is not Taoism) is anti-taoism
happy.gif
 

hilary

Administrator
Joined
Apr 8, 1970
Messages
19,154
Reaction score
3,419
To define 'pre Laozi' first date Laozi
mischief.gif


I've been reading the notes in the back of my Penguin edition. It seems this is not such an easy thing to do - but the book of that name is most likely a bit later than Confucius.
 

kevin

Supporter
Clarity Supporter
Joined
Jan 11, 1973
Messages
749
Reaction score
84
Jessed

Yes.

Daoism is not Daoism by definition.

Daoism is anti Daoism by definition too...

And when we understand Lao Tsu... trash it - for that is not Lao Tsu or Daoism either.

happy.gif


--K
 
J

jesed

Guest
Hi Hillary

Yes. Acoording whit tradition, the Tao Te King was writting in the last years of Lao Tze; after Confucio. But Confucio and Lao Tze had meet each other once (acording whit tradition).

Hi Kevin
Some usual misunderstanding on Tao te King (acording whit tradition): The "Great Tao" is the only one we can't understand; not the "Microcosmical Tao" neither the "Minor Tao". This 2 are "understandables" (and Yi Jing is a way to understanding them). Of course, acording whit that, Taoism is "understandable".. and Lao Tze is "undestandable".

Now, maybe I must stop here... the important thing is: the traditional interpretation posted is usefully to Clarissa?

Best wishes
 

bradford_h

(deceased)
Joined
Nov 16, 1971
Messages
1,115
Reaction score
63
Hilary-
They're still guessing.
Sima Qian, the historian, puts Laozi together with Confuse Us, but Laozi likely came 2 centuries later, fl. circa 375, shortly before Zhuangzi. There was a movement placing Laozi in the 200's or even the Han, but the Guodian discovery shut those guys right up.
Then there's those who say that the DDJ wasn't written by Laozi at all, but by someone else of the same name :)
 

lightofdarkness

(deceased)
Joined
Mar 16, 1970
Messages
1,025
Reaction score
3
The differences between the universal IC I deal with vs the traditional IC most others deal with is that the universal IC is like pure mathematics and the traditional IC is like applied mathematics - IOW universal vs local dynamics.

Universals dynamics is associated with the concept of a 'regular' network - all is connected as POTENTIALS (genotype focus). Exposure to local context then ACTUALISES things (phenotype) but due to local dynamics so the actualisation will

(a) not select the whole regular network immediately, things are built ad-hoc, and so a 'small world' network develops;

(b) relabel universals to reflect their association with local perspectives - iow each specialisation will generate its own language to ensure differentiation from all other specialist languages.

This gets into isomorphism, where specialisations show the same generic qualities, different labels.
(and so my examples in IDM of the IC, the MBTI, categories of emotions, and number types in Mathematics - as well as the elements of Chinese Five-Phase theory and the elements of basic Western categories of socioeconomic and political perspectives)

Traditional perspectives have lacked access to how we derive meaning from our neurology and so is more dependent on making local analogies/metaphors to describe the feelings, the meanings - and so a rich assocation in the traditional texts to ancient china's history/myth etc.

By understanding how 'in here' categorises FREE of any specialisation (and so of sensory data) we come up with the species IC - blending, bonding, bounding, and binding (and their composites). These patterns work for ANY sense, ANY specialisation, in that they are sourced in the one network of communications/representations we cannot do without - the neurology (and so the brain). It is these qualities that elicit the sense of isomorphism across specialisations and so allow us to make analogies/metaphors VERY easily (and so we see the IC in 'everything' and 'everything' in the IC!)

By fleshing-out the links in the regular network so we have better perspectives on any particulars in that network. The traditionalist view does NOT make any reference to a hexagram's "spectrum" other than to vague notions re line position characteristics (and that done without reference to actualisations - e.g. mapping line position 5 to hex 08/14 dynamics or line position 6 to 23/43 dynamics etc. The basic nature is to the line as yang and all else as yin - e.g. line 5 is mapped to 08 as 'ground' and its exaggerated form is described by 14 etc etc)

Given the universal IC, so all we can do is present what the hexagram covers universally - whereas the LOCAL dynamics, what the individual is doing etc is up to the individual to interpret, IOW the focus is to guide, to set a generic direction where the individual fills in the details.

This approach reflects the analogy/metaphor focus of the IC. However, there is also the 'deterministic' perspective where belief in some external force etc means a belief in all is determined and so getting a hexagram describes the situation 1:1 - a literal mapping rather than figurative. Here the tossing of coins recruits the external force to determine the fall of the coins 'in tune' with the current context and so reflect that context.

The neurosciences suggest that rather than one hexagram being applicable to the moment, they ALL are, where we end-up sorting the 64 into a sequence of bestfit/worstfit and our consciousness focuses attention on the bestfit, ignoring all else.

Our consciousness is an agent of mediation and with it comes imagination as well as probabilistic reasoning. The particular nature of consciousness is such that it will exclude a lot from its perceptions and in doing so can lose sight of the organic whole, working only on a mechanistic whole.

The advantage here is in PRECISION, we work with 64 hexagrams, not the whole IC undifferentiated. We can then use LOCAL dynamics to validate/refine the universals and so develop a feedback loop of positive and negative forms - thus our small world network approaches the regular form as we identify more universals but in doing so still uses its own language to describe things!

However, once a universal is identified in full so we can make it create its own context - and we move into the realm of 'pure' forms such as 'pure' mathematics where there is no association to 'out there' actuals, only to POTENTIALS - be they objects or relationships. We then use these universals as guides in that all we can ever know is made-up of patterns of differentiating/integrating with representation/mediation being the consciousness element. LOCAL context will then label things and build its own context, its own language (if left alone, each individual or generation will create their own languages 'instinctively' to describe reality (creole type languages) but education systems ensure a degree of consensus spanning generations)

Chris.
 

Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom

Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).

Top