Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
My only slight doubt would be if your family are all united in this against you, then they might win.
So sorry for the delay but you’re right to think that persistence will ultimately end with the matter in your favor. Keep hope alive!What happened was this:
1). The Supreme Court did in fact all gather which was a concern since too many times not all of the Justices appear.
2). Interestingly, neither my lead counsel nor opposing counsel appeared. I was not at all happy about this, but it appears to have been related to strategy. Honestly, I can't see how.
3). The SC as a group wanted to hear the argument and decide. Opposing counsel wanted to delay and to argue the case. They made it clear that they felt my instructing counsel who was there was more than capable of arguing the case regardless of lead counsel being absent. Still opposing, hoping to drag the matter, persisted with much chastising from the Justices. They said the matter should have been ended long ago.
4). But given that the law allows, another date was set for argument in May. They made it clear that they wouldn't tolerate another delay.
So what did 37 unchanging mean in the end? Hmmm.
I can only say that at this point I believe it meant:
a). I did persist. For persisting, it seems that I got to understand that the Court is finding favor with me, at least on the face of it. They at least granted additional time. Of course, arguments are summarized. They already know what is up for argument and what the positions are. So I did benefit in both their comments and in that progress was made because they made it clear to opposing that they won't suffer further delays. That's definitely in my favor.
b.) In the end, the matter is going back to the Court, but at a latter date. Could it be interpreted that Yi was saying this by giving 37 with no lines. Like it's going back to those Justices (family)? So you will persist, but you won't receive an order this time, but get another date?
c). One interesting thing was the court papers were missing--not located. Can you imagine this? This date was set a year ago. Don't know whether or how this may fit in. The papers were with "the family."
But, honestly, I feel like it's like this:
Keep persisting, in the end, an order will come in your favor. And now that I have gotten a preview of the Court's mindset on the matter, it does seem likely that I might indeed find favor with the court.
So, though it's absolutely mind-bending and frustrating, it seems if I persist, the cast may be an actual prediction of what's to come.
Thanks so much to both of you for replying! It did bring me a lot of hope and calm. Something that beleaguered people in legal matters in David and Goliath type circumstances really need!
beatpoet.
Thanks for the update and kind words! What a complex issue... I really like your analysis of 37 unchanging, also its unchanging nature may be showing that the situation (for now) remained pretty much as it was ('familiar'). Please do persist
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).