Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
This morning I received a nice message from Steve Marshall pointing to a review of his of a new site with some exciting findings. In my experience, very few things excite Steve. All the more reason to pay close attention to the new material:
The Yi-globe
This all sounds Very Important but I don't understand what it means. Can you explain the significance for us bears with very little brains?
Most grateful,
rosada
fkegan said:the Yi globe is left without any clear relationship to the sequence numbering and the King Wen Sequence remains a mystery
fkegan said:and apparently chaotic without any relation to Chinese philosophy.
Ah, just realized I had only gone to the first place Sparhawk suggested and only just now clicked The Yi-globe site.
Hello Rosada (and everybody),
For the sake of your (and everybody's) sake of convenience, I made two new pictures and put up on the Yi-globe site. They are enlarged variants of figure 20 and 21, filled out with the names of the hexagrams: fig. 20b and fig. 21b.
After having thrown coins or stalks, one can locate his/her situation of the moment here, then the changes can be followed and the future position found.
Just like looking into a crystal ball ...
Best, Joe
Hi Joe,
Could you give an example of following a Yi Oracle through your Yi-Globe? If you need a sample Oracle, try hex 55.3,5 >> 17 which are all on the line of latitude in your Yi Globe, and maybe you have a sample that changes position more than that?
The new illustration makes it clear you are arranging the hexagrams by their numbers of Yang lines though not why that relates to the globe.
Cheers, Frank
Hi Joe,
It is nice to see the vectors on your globe, but that still does nothing to explain how one interprets an Oracle through your system or why the KWS should be scrambled to align with the parallels of latitude. Clearly there is some basic background to your system that you are totally steeped in which makes this all make sense to you, but I don't have that context. Regards, Frank
Globetrotting in the footprints of King Wen:the hexagrams are arranged by their numbers of yang lines on the different levels.
interpretation, representation, reading - these are borrowed from the forms and invention of images. the gua are xiang and xiang are gua. the gua are the simplest imaginable image, and so they are traces of self-recognition by the imagination, or recursion at the ur-level.
but even in language Meaning/Principle breaks down even as it is built up again. given sufficient attention, images do speak for themselves.
The gua are the simplest imaginable image, and so they are traces of self-recognition by the imagination, or recursion at the ur-level.
Globetrotting in the footprints of King Wen:
03-04 level II
05-06 level IV travelling north
07-08 level I
09-10 level V travelling north
...
39-40 level II
41-42 level III travelling north
43-44 level V
45-46 level II travelling south
47-48 level III
49-50 level IV travelling north
...
One body, at one time, being in two places:One body, at one time, can't be at two places. (With the exception of certain subatomic, elementary particles.) Thus, e. g. in the case above, you can't start from hex 3 and hex 4 at the same time.
Do you mean, that one only read the lowest line-statesment of the received and each appointed hexagramIf there are two or more changing lines, one has to take the lowermost one first and go to the appointed hexagram. There (in the second hexagram) the second changing line has to be taken into account; this shows the way to the third hexagram. And so on, according to the number of the changing lines.
Do you mean, that one only read the lowest line-statesment of the received and each appointed hexagram
instead of reading all the line-statesments of the received hexagram with more changing lines?
The King Wen sequence is expressing another point of view than the Yi-globe sequence.(From the Yi-globe website):
In all probability, the sixty-four hexagrams have been rearranged some times during the thousands of years.
Presumably, these re-arrangements did not occur at the same time, in one step, but during the gradual transformations of the forms.
essentially there were only three changes removing six hexagram pairs in one instance, and another pair independently from these. In the third case two pairs were exchanged with each other.
The majority of the misplaced hexagrams — six pairs — was removed together.
The canonical matrix, the direct predecessor of the 'traditional' sequence known of our time, has been developed from the Yi-matrix, by means of the displacement of the hexagrams.
Your view at the King Wen sequence is explained and named "The canonical matrix" here:However, the KWS is set up in two halves. The first clearly consists of exactly 30 hexagrams arranged into 3 sets of 10.
The second half has the other possible hexagrams, another 3 sets of 10 and the final four hexagrams as cardinal points by their overall structure highlighting inner, outer, completing and finally beginning.
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).