Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).
Hi Hilary,
It isn't at all a matter of whether you know the numbers themselves (essence of the KWS) or the hexagram personalities from whatever context. It is a matter of taking a moment to explore the inner space within and allow an image to form by itself. If you see that image as an Oracle hexagram with or without moving lines or numbers makes no difference. Or to respond most exactly to your statement, the idea is not to think about the process at all, rather to open inner mental space and watch the Oracle process at work independent of any coins or sticks or hexagram personalities.
Let me give you an example. One person saw two numbers form in their mind and then watched as two other numbers appeared and pushed the first two out of their way. There are mediated and immediate access to divination. Looking inward allows each and all to participate in the divination process without the imposition of either their preconceptions of what hexagrams mean or how the falling coins or separating yarrow bundles 'cause' the Oracle.
The 2 numbers within technique is a simple form of meditation. If it sounds peculiar then it would be useful not to think so much about it, but just relax, be comfortable, close your eyes and listen for your breathing and then your heart beat and then just notice what appears within--- either numbers or lines or oracle hexagrams....
When you have your two numbers or Oracle you will know it and will be able to also describe the process of watching divination materialize before your inner eyes...
And...
Quote:Originally Posted by hilary View Post
As for insights/ discretion - don't worry. Just the usual request, and what pretty much everyone here does pretty much all the time - to do your best to keep debate from spiralling down into content-free flaming.
This part eludes me totally. Sort of reminds me of decades ago when I was giving a talk at a conference, with my stopwatch out on the podium, keeping aware of the exact designated time to be sure I filled almost all of my allotted time and with a bit of quiet space at the end. As I was about to speak my last sentence of 10 seconds in the last 20 seconds of my time--the moderator interrupted me to remind me not to go long over the time limit.
Normally I would expect that such moderator remarks would only appear when required rather than appearing out of the ether and completely out of context. But nowadays I just note these breaches of faith so we all can learn from them.
How could 'debate' spiral down into content-free flaming on my part? Folks react strangely to my remarks not because they are attacks but because they elicit their inner intensity to pour forth in response to my objective, content-filled remarks that they feel as though they are looking into a mirror.
Frank
Did I miss the point? Not sure. I am pretty sure that anyone trying to persuade Chris to try interacting with the I Ching as oracle is doomed to failure.
Also that whatever the way forward is here, it doesn't involve anyone diagnosing anyone else's personality flaws. Neither Chris diagnosing everyone who fails to jettison divination in favour of his system as having rampant ego problems, nor any diagnoses anyone might make of Chris. It is possible to debate ideas without any of this.
Please think about what you want to achieve with your posts, everyone, and what you're likely to achieve. Win someone over? Encourage reflection? Communicate ideas? Broadcast a manifesto? Provoke? Anger? Wound?
C
Frank, I see what you mean with your method - as a form of meditation, it makes a lot of sense. I'll try it. I won't post the answers, though, as knowing that I have to do so is not - for me - a good way to quiet the chattering mind.
Those who had been engaged in frequent conflicts were actually encouraged to sign up for a 3 round bout in the ring. It was was funny as hell, and it equalized in ship's tension.
Hey... we did the same thing in my years in Faculty (after 4 years together, being law students...you can imagine the conflicts!!!)
Frank, I see what you mean with your method - as a form of meditation, it makes a lot of sense. I'll try it. I won't post the answers, though, as knowing that I have to do so is not - for me - a good way to quiet the chattering mind.
I note how pantherpanther's prose gets more confused, misleading, and even vindictive as time goes on.
I note how pantherpanther's prose gets more confused, misleading, and even vindictive as time goes on.
How we didn't think in that option?Did you sue each other rather than box? jajaja
Ah... and if you share with us your result, it would be an excelent practical example to show how "emotional i ching" works much better than traditional aproaches for us to understand our own emotions and decide a better reaction in social intercourses
A huge diversity of ideas is welcomed and encouraged here, and so is vigorous debate about them all. In all this, please respect other members as individuals, and don’t post personal abuse, flaming, belittling, ‘diagnoses’ of their character flaws, etc.
Ah... and if you share with us your result, it would be an excelent practical example to show how "emotional i ching" works much better than traditional aproaches for us to understand our own emotions and decide a better reaction in social intercourses
It is obvious that pantherpanther, and Frank to for that matter, are 'old school' and as such past their 'best before/use-by' dates. The perspectives are antiquated and as such in need of refurbishment but the problem there is the issues where their identity is under threat as well.
Thanks Chris... you probe to be wrong about the use of "emotional i ching" as a better way for us to understand our own emotions and decide a better reaction in social intercourses
Because, as you stated in your own website, the question isn't about how/what/why a third people feel..but about how/why I feel. In this case, not about panther's emotions nor Frank's emotions, but your own emotions triggered by panther's post. And, after recognize YOUR OWN EMOTIONS, decide a better way FOR YOU to react in Clarity.
If -after so many years of knowing and preaching the emotional i ching work- it's author fails to use it in the way he stated it must be used (as a guide for each one of us to understand our own emotions for a better social intecourse); well.. what can i say?
Best wishes. Over and out.
The crucial task of the world's religious and spiritual traditions, the Parliament and other interfaith organizations is restoring a sense of spirituality to all that we do. The common heritages and institutional authority of the religions, combined with an emerging global spirituality, can make enormous contributions to the challenges and details of creating a better world. Though an atheist, Andre' Malraux has said that "the third millennium will be spiritual or there will be no third millennium." Dag Hammarskjold, a rational economist and world observer whom the UN transformed into a mystic, said, "I see no hope for permanent world peace. We have tried and failed miserably. Unless the world has a spiritual rebirth, civilization is doomed."
I agree wholeheartedly. But we (as a species) have a history of divisiveness and exploitation committed in the name of religion. It's important to be clear about what we mean by 'spirituality'. This is what I mean by it -- said beautifully in a poem (restating the Bodhisattva vows) by Stephanie Kaza. It may sound simple, but it holds layers upon layers of depth.
Knowing how deeply our lives intertwine,
We vow not to kill.
Knowing how deeply our lives intertwine,
We vow to not take what is not given.
Knowing how deeply our lives intertwine,
We vow to not engage in abusive relationships.
Knowing how deeply our lives intertwine,
We vow to not speak falsely or deceptively.
Knowing how deeply our lives intertwine,
We vow to not harm self or others through poisonous
thought or substance.
Knowing how deeply our lives intertwine,
We vow to not dwell on past errors.
Knowing how deeply our lives intertwine,
We vow to not speak of self separate from others.
Knowing how deeply our lives intertwine,
We vow to not possess any thing or form of life selfishly.
Knowing how deeply our lives intertwine,
We vow to not harbor ill will toward any plant, animal, or
human being.
Knowing how deeply our lives intertwine,
We vow to not abuse the great truth of the Three Treasures.
It may be a nice poem but what is the use of making vows that do not take circumstance into account...of course they are the vows of a Bodhisattva so i guess they don't really apply to us. ll
I agree wholeheartedly. But we (as a species) have a history of divisiveness and exploitation committed in the name of religion. It's important to be clear about what we mean by 'spirituality'. This is what I mean by it -- said beautifully in a poem (restating the Bodhisattva vows) by Stephanie Kaza. It may sound simple, but it holds layers upon layers of depth.
Knowing how deeply our lives intertwine,...
We vow to not abuse the great truth of the Three Treasures.
For me the emphasis is on "Knowing how deeply our lives intertwine". What we do about it is what we do about it, in any particular time or place or circumstance.
But even what is intertwined is in constant war. Our own skin is a war zone, our own cells die off continually, and progressively as we age they are not replaced. To take part in the organic process is a fight to the finish. Those are the terms. Therefore have I loved, therefore have I fallen.
But even what is intertwined is in constant war. Our own skin is a war zone, our own cells die off continually, and progressively as we age they are not replaced. To take part in the organic process is a fight to the finish. Those are the terms. Therefore have I loved, therefore have I fallen.
Clarity,
Office 17622,
PO Box 6945,
London.
W1A 6US
United Kingdom
Phone/ Voicemail:
+44 (0)20 3287 3053 (UK)
+1 (561) 459-4758 (US).